Referring to Others in the Scientific Journal Article. A brief history
Keywords:Ancients and Moderns, Praise and Criticism, Provenance, Reference, Scientific Community, Scientific Journal Article
Study of a corpus of 30 articles taken from the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, and covering the period 1700-1980, shows that their writing contains features which betray the relationships that prevailed within the scientific community of their time. Some features, such as mention of the Ancients, die out quickly, while others, like giving the provenance of specimens, continue throughout the period. Praising others is common in the early articles but disappears as time goes on. There is some evidence of the epistolary form from which the scientific article developed. Critical remarks, particularly in the early years are accompanied by attempts to explain the supposed error. There is also evidence of the way the gentleman scientist, or virtuoso, gradually gives way to the professional.
Allen, B., Qin, J. and Lancaster, F. W. (1994) Persuasive communities: a longitudinal analysis of references in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1665–1990. Social Studies of Science 24: 279–310.
Atkinson, D. (1999) Sociohistorical Context. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Banks, D. (1996) Joseph Banks and the development of scientific writing. In G. Budin (ed.) Multilingualism in Specialist Communication, Proceedings of the 10th European LSP Symposium, Vienna, 1995, Vol 2 697–705. Vienna: IITF/Infoterm,.
Banks, D. (2001) Personality and impersonality in the writing of Jean Perrin. In M. Mémet and M. Petit (eds) L’anglais de spécialité en France, Mélanges en l’honneur de Michel Perrin 104–112. Bordeaux: GERAS.
Banks, D. (2005) Les marqueurs linguistiques de la présence du chercheur scientifique dans son texte à l’aube du vingtième siècle: les cas de Perrin et de Thomson. In D. Banks (ed.) Les marqueurs linguistiques de la présence de l’auteur 35–44. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Banks, J. (1962) The Endeavour Journal of Joseph Banks, 1768–1771, 2 vols. (Edited by J. C. Beaglehole.) Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
Cameron, H. C. (1952) Sir Joseph Banks: the autocrat of the philosophers. London: Batchworth Press.
Chapman, A. (2005) England’s Leonardo, Robert Hooke and the Seventeenth-century Scientific Revolution. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing.
Cronin, B. (2005) High-fidelity mapping of intellectual space. In P. Turner and E. Davenport (eds) Spaces, Spatiality and Technology 117–128. Dordrecht, Springer.
Cronin, B. and Franks, S. (2006) Trading cultures: resource mobilization and service rendering in the life sciences as revealed in the journal article’s paratext. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(14): 1909–1918.
Cronin, B., McKenzie, G. and Rubio, L. (1993) The norms of acknowledgement in four humanities and social sciences disciplines. Journal of Documentation 49(1): 29–43.
Cronin, B., McKenzie, G. and Stiffler, M. (1992) Patterns of acknowledgment. Journal of Documentation 48(2): 107–122.
Cronin, B. and Overfelt, S. (1994) The scholar’s courtesy: a survey of acknowledgement behaviour. Journal of Documentation 50(3): 165–196.
Cronin, B. and Weaver, S. (1995) The praxis of acknowledgement: from bibliometrics to influmetrics. Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica 18(2): 172–177.
Fara, P. (2002) Newton: the making of genius. London: Picador.
Fara, P. (2003) Sex, Botany and Empire. The Story of Carl Linnaeus and Joseph Banks. Cambridge: Icon Books.
Gascoigne, J. (1994) Joseph Banks and the English Enlightenment, Useful knowledge and Polite Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, G. N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: a sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Glänzel, W. (2007) Characteristic scores and scales. A bibliometric analysis of subject characteristics based on long-term citation observation. Journal of Informetrics 1: 92–102.
Gribbin, J. (2005) The Fellowship. The Story of a Revolution. London: Allen Lane – Penguin.
Gross, A. G., Harmon, J. E. and Reidy, M. (2002) Communicating Science. The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall, A. R. (1951) Two unpublished lectures of Robert Hooke. Isis 42: 219–230.
Hargens, L. L. (2000) Using the literature: reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship. American Sociological Review 65: 846–865.
Jardine, L. (2003) The Curious Life of Robert Hooke: the man who measured London. London: Harper Perennial.
Jones, R. F.  (1982) Ancients and Moderns: a study of the rise of the scientific movement in seventeenth-century England. (Second edition.) New York: Dover.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (Second edition.) Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Lyons, H. (1944) The Royal Society, 1660–1940, A History of its Administration under its Charters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Myers, G. (1990) Writing Biology. Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
O’Brian, P. (1988) Joseph Banks: a life. London: Collins Harvill.
Perrin, J. (1950) Œuvres scientifiques de Jean Perrin. Paris: CNRS.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1998a) The rationale behind academic conflict: from outright criticism to conventional «niche» creation. Unesco ALSED-LSP Newsletter 21(2): 4–22.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1998b) Le discours aigre-doux de la controverse scientifique: évolution de la rhétorique des confrontations académiques. ASp, la Revue du GERAS 19/22: 29–50.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1999a) Referential behaviour in scientific writing: a diachronic study (1810–1995). English for Specific Purposes 18(3): 279–306.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1999b) From ‘Mr. Guthrie is profoundly mistaken…’ to ‘Our data do not seem to confirm the results of a previous study on…’: a diachronic study of polemicity in academic writing (1810–1995). Iberica. Revista de la Asociasión Europea de Lenguas para Fines Especificos 1: 5–28.
Salager-Meyer, F. (2001a) Intertextuality in contemporary English and French medical discourse: a contrastive analysis of counterargumentation. Interface, Journal of Applied Linguistics 16(1): 27–44.
Salager-Meyer, F. (2001b) From self-highlightedness to self-effacement: a genre-based study of the socio-pragmatic function of criticism in medical discourse. LSP and Professional Communication 1(2): 63–84.
Salager-Meyer, F. (2001c) The bittersweet rhetoric of controversiality in nineteenthand twentieth-century French and English medical literature. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2(1): 141–173.
Salager-Meyer, F., Alcaraz Ariza, M. F. and Zambrano, N. (2003) The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930–1995). English for Specific Purposes 22(3): 223–248.
Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2004) Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tiew, W. S. and Sen, B. K. (2002) Acknowledgment patterns in research articles: a bibliometric study based on Journal of Natural Rubber Research 1986–1997. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 7(1): 43–56.
Valle, E. (1999) A Collective Intelligence: the life sciences in the Royal Society as a scientific discourse community, 1665–1965. Turku: Anglicana Turkuensia.
Ventola, E. (1998a) Meaningful choices in academic communities, ideological issues. In R. Schulze (ed.) Making Meaningful Choices in English. On Dimensions, Perspectives, Methodology and Evidence 277–294. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Ventola, E. (1998b) Interpersonal choices in academic work. In A. Sánchez-Macarro and R. Carter (eds) Linguistic Choice across Genres. Variation in Spoken and Written English 117–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
How to Cite
© Equinox Publishing Ltd.
For information regarding our Open Access policy, click here.