(Nanny) State as family by proxy
Media discourses on refugee and asylum-seeking children in Norway
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.26482Keywords:
critical discourse studies, family language policy, media, southern epistemologies, unaccompanied minorsAbstract
In this article, we extend the boundaries of research on family language policy (FLP) by addressing the situation that occurs when the State takes over the care of unaccompanied minor refugees and asylum-seekers, thereby assuming by proxy the responsibilities normally assigned to families. We analyse media discourses involving unaccompanied minors (UMs) in Norway, a Scandinavian country perceived as having liberal policies, in a corpus of 30 articles published between 2016 and 2017, a significant period of immigration in a European context. Our analysis reveals a polarized debate around these children, often termed anchor children, who allegedly aim for future biological family reunification. Assuming the family role as proxy, Norway is referred to as a Nanny State, making decisions for the UMs regarding their well-being, education and language learning. Engaging with recent calls for decolonizing and southernizing critical discourse studies (CDS), we anchor our analysis onto decoloniality. We argue that this epistemological move allows us to identify opposing understandings of culture undergirding two competing sides in debates about UMs in Norway. The study has both theoretical and methodological implications for future conceptualizations of the family in FLP research.
References
Aftenposten. (1991). Hva skal det bli til med Mui og Loc. Retrieved on 10 February 2023 from https://www.nb.no
BBC News. (2018). Are we living in a ‘nanny state’? Retrieved on 18 May 2023 from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-45356189
Catalano, T. and Mitchell-McCollough, J. (2019). Representation of unaccompanied migrant children from Central America in the United States: Media vs. migrant perspectives. In L. Viola and A. Musolff (eds), Migration and media: Discourses about identities in crisis (pp. 239–262). John Benjamins.
De Fina, A., Oostendorp, M. and Ortega, L. (2023). Sketches toward a decolonial applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 44(5), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad059
Eriksen, T. H. (2013). Frictions of hospitality and the promise of cosmopolitanism. In T. Claviez (ed.), The conditions of hospitality: ethics, politics, and aesthetics on the threshold of the possible (pp. 81–93). Fordham University Press.
Fangen, K. and Vaage, M. (2018). ‘The immigration problem’ and Norwegian right-wing politicians. New Political Science, 40(3), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2018.1487145
Fanon, F. (1991). The wretched of the earth, trans. Constance Farrington. Grove Press.
Flowerdew, J., Li, D. C. and Tran, S. (2002). Discriminatory news discourse: Some Hong Kong data. Discourse & Society, 13(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013003052
Heugh, K., Stroud, C., Taylor-Leech, K. and De Costa, P. I. (eds). (2021). A sociolinguistics of the South. Routledge.
Ibrahim, Y. (2020). The child refugee in Calais: From invisibility to the ‘suspect figure’. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 5, 19, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-020-00087-z
KhosraviNik, M. (2010). Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: Towards a systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453948
Krzyanowski, M., Triandafyllidou, A. and Wodak, R. (2018). The mediatization and the politicization of the ‘refugee crisis’ in Europe. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189
Lanza, E. and Lomeu Gomes, R. (2020). Family language policy: Foundations, theoretical perspectives and critical approaches. In A. C. Schalley and S. A. Eisenchlas (eds), Handbook of home language maintenance and development: Social and affective factors (pp. 153–173). De Gruyter Mouton.
Lazar, M. M. (2017). Homonationalist discourse as a politics of pragmatic resistance in Singapore’s Pink Dot movement: Towards a southern praxis. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(3), 420–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12239
Lazar, M. M. (2020). Politics of the ‘South’: Discourses and praxis. Discourse & Society, 31(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519886126
Léglise, I., Bagga-Gupta, S. and Deumert, A. (2023). Transcending circulations of southern and northern concepts: Introducing mobile and dialogic perspectives on language. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17(4), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2023.2206385
Lomeu Gomes, R. (2018). Family language policy ten years on: A critical approach to family multilingualism. Multilingual Margins, 5(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.14426/mm.v5i2.98
Lomeu Gomes, R. (2021). Family multilingualism from a Southern perspective: Language ideologies and practices of Brazilian parents in Norway. Multilingua, 40(5), 707–734. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2019-0080
Lomeu Gomes, R. (2024). Representations of youth in Western media: Towards a Southern perspective. In B. A. Svendsen and R. Jonsson (eds), The Routledge handbook of language and youth culture (pp. 437–449). Routledge.
Lomeu Gomes, R. and Lanza, E. (2022). Southern approaches to family multilingualism. In S. Makoni, A. Kaiper-Marquez and L. Mokwena (eds), The Routledge handbook of language and the Global South/s (pp. 285–296). Routledge.
Lomeu Gomes, R. and Svendsen, B. A. (2023). Minoritized youth language in Norwegian media discourse: Surfacing the abyssal line. In B. E. Antia and S. Makoni (eds), Southernizing sociolinguistics: Colonialism, racism, and patriarchy in language in the Global South (pp. 206–224). Routledge.
MacDonald, F. (2017). Positioning young refugees in Australia: Media discourse and social exclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(11), 1182–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1350324
Makoni, S., Madany-Saá, M., Antia, B. and Lomeu Gomes, R. (eds). (2022). Decolonial voices, language and race. Multilingual Matters.
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 240–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548
Mignolo, W. D. (1995). ‘Decires fuera de lugar: sujetos dicentes, roles sociales y formas de inscripción’, Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana, 41(2), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/4530794
Ministry of Children and Families. (2023a). Child Welfare Act, 1 January. Retrieved on 15 September 2023 from https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/child-welfare-act/id2971550
Ministry of Children and Families. (2023b). Child Welfare Act. Old version. Retrieved on 15 February 2021 from https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLO/lov/1992-07-17-100
Ngugi wa Thiong’o. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. Heinemann.
Patil, T. V. and McLaren, H. J. (2019). Australian media and islamophobia: Representations of asylum seeker children. Religions, 10(9), Article 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10090501
Patler, C. and Gonzales, R. G. (2015). Framing citizenship: Media coverage of anti-deportation cases led by undocumented immigrant youth organisations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(9), 1453–1474. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1021587
Purkarthofer, J., Lanza, E. and Berg, M. F. (2022). Discourses between the public and the private: Transnational families at the crossroads. Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab053
Quijano, A. (2001). Globalización, colonialidad y democracia. In Tendencias básicas de nuestra época: globalización y democracia. Instituto de Altos Estudios Diplomáticos Pedro Gual, pp. 25–61.
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87–121). Sage.
Resende, V. M. (2021). Decolonizing critical discourse studies: For a Latin American perspective. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1490654
Santos, B. de S. (2017). Epistemologías del Sur: Perspectivas para nuevos desarrollos sociales, políticos e institucionales. CLACSO.
Statistics Norway (2022a). Unaccompanied minor refugees 1996–2020. Demographics, education, employment, income and child welfare services. Retrieved on 15 September 2023 from https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/innvandrere/artikler/unaccompanied-minor-refugees-1996-2020.demographics-education-employment-income-and-child-welfare-services
Statistics Norway. (2022b). Enslige mindreårige flyktninger 1996–2020: Demografi, utdanning, arbeid, inntekt og barnevern. [Unaccompanied minor refugees 1996–2020: Demographics, education, employment, income and child welfare services]. Retrieved on 15 September 2023 from https://ssb.brage.unit.no/ssb-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/3040358/RAPP2022-20.pdf?sequence=1
Strom, M. and Alcock, E. (2017). Floods, waves, and surges: The representation of Latin@ immigrant children in the United States mainstream media. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(4), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1284137
Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011001002
UN. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved on 12 September 2023 from www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention
UN CRC. (2005). General comment no. 7 (2005): Implementing child rights in early childhood. Retrieved on 12 September 2023 from https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/GeneralComment7Rev1.pdf
UNHCR. (2015). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2015. Retrieved on 12 September 2023 from https://www.unhcr.org/media/unhcr-global-trends-2015
UNICEF. (2010). Children on the move. Retrieved on 12 September 2023 from https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4ec4c48d2.pdf
Windle, J. (2017). The public positioning of refugees in the quasi-education market: Linking mediascapes and social geographies of schooling. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(11), 1128–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1350320
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, methodology. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds), Methods for critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–33). Sage.
Wright, L. (2022). Critical perspectives on language and kinship in multilingual families. Bloomsbury.
Wright, L. and Higgins, C. (eds). (2022). Diversifying family language policy. Bloomsbury.
Yilmaz, B. (2021). The making of unaccompanied children: From legal discourse to the everyday. Language, Culture and Society, 3(2), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.21016.yil
