The impact of teacher collaboration on teachers’ practices and classroom interaction in EMI in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.23485Keywords:
Bilingual education, classroom interaction, English Medium Instruction (EMI), instructional practices, teacher collaborationAbstract
In English medium instruction (EMI) contexts, students often encounter difficulties when learning content knowledge through their second/foreign/additional language (L2). Teacher collaboration (TC) between content and language specialists has been regarded as a potential approach to facilitating student learning in these contexts, since during collaboration, teachers can become more language aware and subsequently better integrate content and language teaching. While previous research has revealed the impact of TC on student learning, little attention has been paid to how it may affect teachers’ instructional practices and classroom interaction. To fill this research gap, this quasi-experimental study invited a drama course instructor and a language instructor at a Chinese university to collaborate to revise the course objectives and instructional activities. The drama instructor then used the revised materials with the experimental class (25 students) while practising her normal content-oriented teaching in the control class (25 students). Data were collected with lesson observations and recordings in the two classes, as well as semi-structured interviews with the two teachers and selected students. Drawing on the notion of language-related episodes (LREs), this study reported the differences in classroom interaction patterns between the two classes. The findings show that through collaboration with the language teacher, the drama instructor incorporated more LREs in different aspects, especially in vocabulary and text structure, in the experimental class than in her control class. These findings yield pedagogical implications for TC and for promoting classroom interaction in the EMI classroom.
References
Airey, J. (2012). ‘I don’t teach language’: The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden. AILA Review, 25(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.25.05air
An, J., Macaro, E. and Childs, A. (2019). Language focused episodes by monolingual teachers in English medium instruction science lessons. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18019.an
Arnó-Macià, E. and Mancho-Barés, G. (2015). The role of content and language in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at university: Challenges and implications for ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.007
Basturkmen, H. (2018). Dealing with language issues during subject teaching in EMI: The perspectives of two accounting lecturers. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 692–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.460
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2012). Themetic analysis. In H. Cooper (ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (pp. 57–71). Amercian Psychological Association.
Cammarata, L. (2016). Foreign language education and the development of inquiry-driven language programs: Key challenges and curricular planning strategies. In L. Cammarata (ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (pp. 123–46). Routledge.
Campagna, S. (2016). English as a medium of instruction: A ‘resentment study’ of a micro EMI context. In S. Campagna, E. Ochse, V. Pulcini, and M. Solly (eds), ‘Languaging’ in and across communities: New voices, new identities (pp. 145–168). Peter Lang.
Coyle, D., Hood, P. and Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Doiz, A. and Lasagabaster, D. (2021). Analysing EMI teachers’ and students’ talk about language and language use. In D. Lasagabaster and D. Aintzane (eds), Language use in English-medium instruction at university (pp. 34–55). Routledge.
Ebad, R. (2014). The role and impact of English as a language and a medium of instruction in Saudi higher education institutions: Students-instructors perspective. Studies in English Language Teaching, 2(2), 140–48. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v2n2p140
ETS. (2017). The official guide to the TOEFL test (5th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Evans, S. and Morrison, B. (2011). Meeting the challenges of English-medium higher education: The first-year experience in Hong Kong. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.01.001
Evans, S. and Morrison, B. (2017). English-medium instruction in Hong Kong: Illuminating a grey area in school policies and classroom practices. Current Issues in Language Planning, 18(3), 303–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1270106
Hu, G. and Duan, Y. (2019). Questioning and responding in the classroom: A cross-disciplinary study of the effects of instructional mediums in academic subjects at a Chinese university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1493084
Kong, S. (2014). Collaboration between content and language specialists in late immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1607
Lasagabaster, D. (2018). Fostering team teaching: Mapping out a research agenda for English-medium instruction at university level. Language Teaching, 51(3), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000113
Lo, Y. Y. (2015). A glimpse into the effectiveness of L2-content cross-curricular collaboration in content-based instruction programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(4), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.916654
Lo, Y. Y. (2020). Professional development of CLIL teachers. Springer.
Lo, Y. Y. and Jeong, H. (2018). Impact of genre-based pedagogy on students’ academic literacy development in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Linguistics and Education, 47, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.08.001
Lo, Y. Y. and Lin, A. (2019). Teaching, learning, and scaffolding in CLIL science classrooms. Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education, 7(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.115
Lyster, R. (2018). Content-based language teaching. Routledge.
Lyster, R. and Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2018). Introduction: Instructional practices and teacher development in CLIL and immersion school settings. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 273–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383353
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction. Oxford University Press.
Macaro, E. and Tian, L. (2020). Developing EMI teachers through a collaborative research model. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1862131
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. Equinox.
Martinez, R., Machado, P. and Palma, C. (2021). An exploratory analysis of language related episodes (LREs) in a Brazilian EMI context: Lecturers’ and students’ perspectives. In D. Lasagabaster and D. Aintzane (eds), Language use in English-Medium instruction at university (pp. 11–33). Routledge.
Rui, X. (2022). Effects of teacher collaboration on teaching and learning in the content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classroom. PhD thesis, University of Hong Kong.
Rui, X., Li, X., Li, Y. and Lo, Y. Y. (2022). Examining the effects of teacher collaboration on student learning in a CLIL classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2152276
Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second langauge learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371
Valdés-Sánchez, L. and Espinet, M. (2020). Coteaching in a science-CLIL classroom: Changes in discursive interaction as evidence of an English teacher’s science-CLIL professional identity development. International Journal of Science Education, 42(14), 2426–2452. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1710873
Wallace, A., Spiliotopoulos, V. and Ilieva, R. (2020). CLIL collaborations in higher education: A critical perspective. English Teaching & Learning, 44(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00052-4
Xu, X., Rose, H., McKinley, J. and Zhou, S. (2021). The incentivisation of English medium instruction in Chinese universities: Policy misfires and misalignments. Applied Linguistics Review, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-0181
Zappa-Hollman, S. (2018). Collaborations between language and content university instructors: Factors and indicators of positive partnerships. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(5), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1491946
