Listen-and-repeat training of non-native vowel quality
Preliminary findings from speakers of Namibian languages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jmbs.26127Keywords:
non-native speech learning, vowel production, vowel quality, phonetic training, identificationAbstract
This study investigated how listen-and-repeat training affects the production of non-native (Swedish) vowels /y/ and /u/ by speakers of different Namibian languages. Seventeen speakers, who did not have /y/ or /u/ categories in their L1, participated in the experiment. Training effects were measured with acoustic analysis and an identification task performed by 40 proficient Swedish speakers, to see whether the acoustic quality and the perceptual salience of the speakers’ non-native production evolved during training. We expected the speakers’ production to change as a function of training, and the change to be reflected on the vowel formant values and the identification task. The results showed that the speakers produced /u/ close to the trained target already in the first session, but changed their production away from the target after the first training. The speakers’ production of /y/ did not change significantly. The speakers did not reach a perceivable spectral difference between the two non-native vowels. The participants’ productions remained inconsistent throughout the experiment. There was great inter-speaker variation, which could not be accounted for by the speakers’ language backgrounds.
References
Akahane-Yamada, R., McDermott, E., Adachi, T., Kawahara, H., & Pruitt, J. (1998). Computer-based second language production training by using spectrographic representation and HMM-based speech recognition scores. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Paper 0429). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1998-722
Alku, P., Tiitinen, H., & Näätänen, R. (1999). A method for generating natural-sounding speech stimuli for cognitive brain research. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(8), 1329–1333.
Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J. C. Goodman, & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–224). The MIT Press.
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct-realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–206). York Press.
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O.-S. Bohn, & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language learning and language teaching (Vol. 17, pp. 13–34). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2022). Praat (Version 6.2.20). [Computer software]. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206911
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310.
de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). York Press.
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press.
Immonen, K., Alku, P., & Peltola, M. S. (2022). Phonetic listen-and-repeat training alters 6–7-year-old children’s non-native vowel contrast production after one training session. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 8(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.21005.imm
Immonen, K., Kilpeläinen, J., Alku, P., & Peltola, M. S. (2021). Does studying in a music-oriented education program affect non-native sound learning? Effects of passive auditory training on children’s vowel production. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(5), 678–687. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1205.06
Immonen, K., Peltola, K. U., Tamminen, H., Alku, P., & Peltola, M. S. (2023). Orthography does not hinder non-native production learning in children. Second Language Research, 39(2), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221076645
Iverson, P., Pinet, M., & Evans, B. G. (2012). Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000300
Jähi, K., Alku, P., & Peltola, M. S. (2015). Does interest in language learning affect the non-native phoneme production in elderly learners. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. ICPhS. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0234.pdf
Kilarski, M., & Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, K. (2012). On extremes in linguistic complexity: Phonetic accounts of Iroquoian, Polynesian and Khoesan. Historiographia Linguistica: International Journal for the History of the Language Sciences/Revue Internationale Pour l’Histoire Des Sciences Du Langage/Internationale Zeitschrift Für Die Geschichte Der Sprachwissenschaften, 39(2–3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.39.2-3.05kil
Knight, R.-A. (2012). Phonetics: A coursebook (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. University of Chicago Press.
Lindau, M. (1978). Vowel features. Language, 54(3), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.2307/412786
Lusakalalu, P. (2007). Media, education and the count of Namibian languages. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 2, 85–101.
Maddieson, I., & Sands, B. (2019). The sounds of the Bantu languages. In M. Van de Velde, K. Bostoen, D. Nurse, & G. Philippson (Eds.), The Bantu languages (2nd ed., pp. 79–127). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755946-3
Norro, S. (2022). Factors affecting language policy choices in the multilingual context of Namibia: English as the official language and medium of instruction. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 16(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.47862/apples.107212
Odden, D. (2015). Bantu phonology. In Oxford Handbooks Editorial Board (Ed.), Oxford handbook: Topics in linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.59
Peltola, K. U., Rautaoja, T., Alku, P., & Peltola, M. S. (2017). Adult learners and a one-day production training: Small changes but the native language sound system prevails. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 1–7.
Peltola, K. U., Tamminen, H., Alku, P., Kujala, T., & Peltola, M. S. (2020). Motoric training alters speech sound perception and production: Active listening training does not lead into learning outcomes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(1), 10–16.
Peltola, K. U., Tamminen, H., Alku, P., & Peltola, M. S. (2015). Non-native production training with an acoustic model and orthographic or transcription cues. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. ICPhS. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0236.pdf
Peltola, M. S., Tamminen, H., Toivonen, H., Kujala, T., & Näätänen, R. (2012). Different kinds of bilinguals – different kinds of brains: The neural organisation of two languages in one brain. Brain and Language, 121(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.007
Saloranta, A., Alku, P., & Peltola, M. S. (2020). Listen-and-repeat training improves perception of second language vowel duration: Evidence from mismatch negativity (MMN) and N1 responses and behavioral discrimination. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 147, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.11.005
Taimi, L., Jähi, K., Alku, P., & Peltola, M. S. (2014). Children learning a non-native vowel: The effect of a two-day production training. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(6), 1229–1235.
Tamminen, H., Kujala, T., Näätänen, R., & Peltola, M. S. (2021). Aging and non-native speech perception: A phonetic training study. Neuroscience Letters, 740, 135430. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEULET.2020.135430
Tamminen, H., Peltola, M. S., Kujala, T., & Näätänen, R. (2015). Phonetic training and non-native speech perception: New memory traces evolve in just three days as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and behavioural measures. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 97(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.04.020
Ylinen, S., Uther, M., Latvala, A., Vepsäläinen, S., Iverson, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Näätänen, R. (2010). Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: A study of Finnish second-language users of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1319–1332.
