Reaction times to morphologically inflected nonwords
a study of second language learners of English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jmbs.19485Keywords:
morphophonology, inflection, nonwords, second language, perceptionAbstract
Previous work has shown that monolingual speakers of English are sensitive to the presence of inflectional morphology when it is applied to nonwords. For example, when a nonword ends in a sequence of phonemes that respect the morphophonological rules regulating tense inflection, speakers are slower in recognising it. In this study, we investigated whether a similar pattern applies to second language learners as well. 91 learners of English with Czech as L1 where presented with a same/different minimal pairs task containing nonwords with various endings (in one condition, a sequence of phonemes that could be interpreted as an inflectional morpheme). Consistently with research on monolingual participants, the study showed that also second language learners are slower in processing nonwords that contain potential inflectional morphemes. The pattern was observed from low levels of proficiency, suggesting that learners are sensitive to these rules from early stages of learning.
References
Ambrus, L., Sunnqvist, C., Asp, M., Westling, S. & Westrin, Å. (2017). Coping and suicide risk in high risk psychiatric patients. Journal of Mental Health, 29(1), 27–32.
Anderson, J. D. & Byrd, C. T. (2008). Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 851–66.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7. 2014. See https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/vignettes/lmer.pdf.
Beauvillain, C. (1994). Morphological structure in visual word recognition: Evidence from prefixed and suffixed words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 317–39.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A. & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28(3), 297–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0
Cilibrasi, L. (2016). Word position effects in speech perception. Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading, UK.
Cilibrasi, L., Stojanovik, V., Riddell, P., & Saddy, D. (2019). Sensitivity to inflectional morphemes in the absence of meaning: evidence from a novel task. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(3), 747–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09629-y
Cilibrasi, L., & Tsimpli, I. (2020). Sensitivity to morphophonological cues in monolingual and bilingual children: Evidence from a nonword task. In E. Babatsouli & M. J. Ball (eds), An anthology of bilingual child phonology (pp. 140–62). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(6), 991–1013.
Grainger, J. & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
Jiránková, L. (2017). Word-ending perception in second-language learners of English. MA thesis, Charles University, Czech Republic.
Kimppa, L., Shtyrov, Y., Hut, S. C. A., Hedlund, L., Leminen, M. & Leminen, A. (2019). Acquisition of L2 morphology by adult language learners. Cortex, 116, 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.012
Korecky-Kröll, K., Dressler, W. U., Freiberger, E. M., Reinisch, E., Mörth, K. & Libben, G. (2014). Morphonotactic and phonotactic processing in German-speaking adults. Language Sciences, 46, 48–58.
Ku, Y.-M. & Anderson, R. C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing, 16(5), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024227231216
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.
Lehtonen, M. & Laine, M. (2003). How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(3), 213–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001147
Lehtonen, M., Niska, H., Wande, E., Niemi, J. & Laine, M. (2006). Recognition of inflected words in a morphologically limited language: Frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-9008-1
Marshall, C. R. & van der Lely, H. K. (2006). A challenge to current models of past tense inflection: The impact of phonotactics. Cognition, 100(2), 302–20.
McQueen, J. M. & Cutler, A. (1998). Morphology in word recognition. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (eds), The handbook of morphology (pp. 406–27). Oxford: Blackwell.
Melichar, J. & V. Styblík (1967). Ceský jazyk: rozšírený prehled uciva základní školy s cviceními a klícem. Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.
Moore, D. S. & McCabe, G. P. (1999). Introduction to the practice of statistics, 3rd edition. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E. & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Pérez, A., Joseph, H. S. S. L., Bajo, T. & Nation, K. (2016). Evaluation and revision of inferential comprehension in narrative texts: An eye movement study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(4), 549–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1115883
Portin, M., Lehtonen, M. & Laine, M. (2006). Processing of inflected nouns in late bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(1), 135–56.
Post, B., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Randall, B. & Tyler, L. K. (2008). The processing of English regular inflections: Phonological cues to morphological structure. Cognition, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.011
R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Šmilauer, V. (1973) Nauka o ceském jazyku. Prague: SPN.
Vitevitch, M. S. & Luce, P. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(3), 481–7.
