American Afterlives
Ghosts in the Commodity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.36898Keywords:
cremation, death, funerary practices, object agency, ontology, United StatesAbstract
In the United States, death practices have been undergoing a rapid transformation in the last 20 years. Moves towards creative, individualized observances are accompanied by new material practices. I deploy ethnographic examples of three entrepreneurs who make objects from cremated human remains. The entities discussed here cannot be comfortably called either human or non-human. They are both. And they are designed to facilitate on ongoing relationship with the dead. These new entities are not exactly commodities, although they may be produced through similar means. Embraced primarily by agnostics, they are not exactly religious relics, although they contain preserved parts of the human body. They come closest to being a personal fetish, or a radically material type of ghost.
References
Appadurai, A. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ariès, P. 1981. The Hour of Our Death: The Classic History of Western Attitudes Toward Death over the Last One Thousand Years. trans. H. Weaver, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Bennett, J. 2009 Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Cann, C.K. 2015. Virtual Afterlives: Grieving the Dead in the Twenty-First Century. University of Kentucky Press.
Dawdy, S.L. 2016. Patina: A Profane Archaeology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
de la Cadena, M. 2015. Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fowles, S. 2011. “’Worlds Otherwise’: Archaeology, Anthropology and Ontological Difference.” Current Anthropology 52(6):896-912.
Freud, S. 2003 [1899]. The Uncanny. New York: Penguin Books.
Geary, P. 1986. “Sacred Commodities: The Circulation of Medieval Relics.” In Social Life of Things, edited by A. Appadurai, 169–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
González-Ruibal, A. 2006. “The Past Is Tomorrow. Towards an Archaeology of the Vanishing Present.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 39(2): 110-125.
Hagerty, A. 2014. “Speak Softly to the Dead: The Uses of Enchantment in American Home Funerals.” Social Anthropology, 22(4): 428-442.
Hertz, R. 1960 [1907]. Death and the Right Hand. Aberdeen: The University Press.
Kohn, E. 2013. How Forests Think: Towards an Anthropology beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kristeva, J. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. by L. Roudiez, New York: Columbia University Press.
Laqueur, T. 2015. The Work of the Dead: A Cultural History of Mortal Remains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
--- 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lazzari, M. 2014. “Old and New Materialisms [response to Witmore].” Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1(2): 236-238.
LifeGem website. http://www.lifegem.com/index.php (accessed 14 July 2018).
Mitford, J. 2000 [revised]. The American Way of Death Revisited. New York: Vintage Books.
Olsen, B. 2010. In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Plymouth, UK: Altamira Press.
Pietz, W. 1985. “The Problem of the Fetish, I.” RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 9: 5–17.
Schwartz, M. 2015. Dead Matter: The Meaning of Iconic Corpses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Taussig, M. 1980. The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Venkatesan, S., ed., with M. Candea, M. Carrithers, M. Holbraad, and K. Sykes. 2010. “Ontology Is Just Another Word for Culture," Critique of Anthropology 30(2):152-200.
Witmore, C. 2014. “Archaeology and the New Materialisms.” Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1(2): 203-246.
