Everything is Everything
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v2i2.28452Keywords:
Interdisciplinarity, drawing practicesAbstract
Artists, architects, musicians and archaeologists have all pondered the universal applicability of their own discipline and wondered at the bounty available through the dissolving of disciplinary constraints. But this paper argues that strong, speculative interdisciplinary work necessarily requires strong and vital disciplinary centres. My own interdisciplinary navigations outwards from architecture towards archaeology have explored, in particular, similarities between architectural and archaeological drawing practices revealing otherwise obscured resemblances between the purported aims of those disciplines. Central amongst these repressed similarities being the fallacy of regarding archaeology as past-facing and architecture as future-facing. This paper argues that despite these temporal teleologies both disciplines are enacted in the present and that their ostensibly unconnected practices of design and reconstruction in fact share common aims with positive repercussions for both disciplines.
References
Beuys, J. 1990 [1969] “Interview with Willoughby Sharp.” In Joseph Beuys in America: Energy Plan for the Western Man: Writings and Interviews with the Artist, 77 –92. Compiled C. Kuoni. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.
Carr, E. H. 1987 [1961]. What is History? Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Coles, A. and A. Defert, eds. 1998. de-, dis-, ex-. 2: Anxiety of Interdisciplinarity, London: Black Dog.
Colsell, I. 2013. Malicious Damage: the Defaced Library Books of Kenneth Halliwell and Joe Orton. London: Donlon Books.
Gurevich, A. 1995. “The French Historical Revolution: The Annales School.” In Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, edited by I. Hodder, 158–161. London: Routledge.
Hodder, I. 2000. Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
____. ed. 2006. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hollein, H. 1968. [Introduction to Alles Ist Architektur]. BAU 1/2: 2.
Kostelanetz, R. 2003. Conversing with Cage. London: Routledge.
O’Connor, B. 2008. “Dust and Debitage: An Archaeology of Francis Bacon’s Studio.” In Archaeologies of Art: Papers from the Sixth World Archaeological Congress, edited by I. Russell (audio). Dublin: UCD Scholarcast.
Presner, T. S. 2004. “‘What a Synoptic and Artificial View Reveals’: Extreme History and the Modernism of W. G. Sebald’s Realism.” Criticism 46: 341–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/crt.2005.0011
Ranke, L. V. 1885 [1824]. Geschichten der romanischen und germanischen Völker von 1494 bis 1514. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Rudofsky, B. 2002 [1964]. Architecture Without Architects: A Short Introduction to Non-pedigree Architecture, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Shanks, M. 2012. The Archaeological Imagination. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
____. and I. Hodder. 1995. “Processual, Postprocessual and Interpretive Archaeologies.” In Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, edited by I. Hodder, M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Carman, J. Last and G. Lucas, 3–29 . London: Routledge.
____. and R. H. McGuire. 1996. “The Craft of Archaeology.” American Antiquity 61(1): 75–88.
____. and C. Tilley. 1992. “Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice.” London: Routledge.
Zambelli, A. 2011. “Scandalous Practice: Between Architecture and Art.” International Journal of the Arts in Society 5(6): 163–174.
____. 2013. “The Undisciplined Drawing.” Buildings 3: 357–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings3020357
