Artifactual Interpretation

Authors

  • Grant Wythoff Columbia University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v2i1.27061

Keywords:

disciplinarity, humanities, interpretation, materiality, media studies, methodology

Abstract

Media archaeology has thus far been informed by Michel Foucault's largely metaphorical use of the term "archaeology" to denote an inquiry into "the law of what can be said, the system that governs the appearance of statements as unique events." But the discipline of traditional archaeology, its primary concern being the study of how objects mediate our relationship to the past, has much to offer a *media* archaeology. I outline here some of the intellectual affinities between these two disciplines, with notes toward future methodological exchange.

Author Biography

  • Grant Wythoff, Columbia University

    Grant Wythoff is Postdoctoral Fellow, Society of Fellows in the Humanities, and Lecturer in the Department of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University.

References

Alt, C. 2011. “Objects of Our Affection: How Object Orientation Made Computers a Medium.” In Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications, edited by E. Huhtamo and J. Parikka, 278–301. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Binford, L. R. 1962. “Archaeology as Anthropology.” American Antiquity 28(2): 217. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/278380

Brown, B. 2010. “Materiality.” In Critical Terms for Media Studies, edited by W. J. T Mitchell and M. B. N. Hansen, 49–63. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Feyerabend, P. 1993. Against Method. London: Verso.

Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. London: Routledge.

Gamble, C. 1998. “Palaeolithic Society and the Release from Proximity: A Network Approach to Intimate Relations.” World Archaeology 29(3): 426–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1998.9980389

Gillespie, T., P. J. Boczkowski and K. A. Foot, eds. 2014. Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.001.0001

Hartley, J. 2002. Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts (3rd edition). London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203449936

Hayles, N. K. and J. Pressman, eds. 2013. Comparative Textual Media: Transforming the Humanities in the Postprint Era. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Hodder, I. 2011. “Human-Thing Entanglement: Towards an Integrated Archaeological Perspective.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17(1): 154–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x

Ingold, T. 2007. “Materials against Materiality.” Archaeological Dialogues 14(1): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127

Jonsson, F. A. 2014. “Victorian Anthropocene, 1834-1884.” Paper presented at the Heyman Center for the Humanities Thursday Lecture Series: Materiality, Columbia University, 17 April.

Kirschenbaum, M. G. 2008. Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kittler, F. A. 1992. Discourse Networks, 1800/1900. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

____. 1999 [1986] Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Translated by G. Winthrop-Young and M. Wutz. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Krajewski, M. 2010. Der Diener: Mediengeschichte Einer Figur Zwischen König Und Klient. Auflage: 1. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.

Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1993. Gesture and Speech. Translated by A. Bostock Berger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lykke, N., R. Markussen and F. Olesen. 2008. “‘There Are Always More Things Going On Than You Thought!’ Methodologies as Thinking Technologies: Interview with Donna Haraway.” In Bits of Life: Feminism at the Intersections of Media, Bioscience, and Technology, edited by A. Smelik and N. Lykke, 32–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Mackenzie, A. 2010. Wirelessness: Radical Empiricism in Network Cultures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/
mitpress/9780262014649.001.0001

McLuhan, M. 2001 [1964] Understanding Media. London: Routledge.

Munster, A. 2014. “Materiality.” In The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media, edited by M.-L. Ryan, L. Emerson, and B. J. Robertson, 327–330. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Sloterdijk, P. 2012. “Actio in Distans: On Forms of Telerational World-Making.” In Philosophy of Communication, edited by B. G. Chang and G. C. Butchart, 635–648. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sprenger, F. and C. Engemann. 2014. “DCRL & MECS Summer School 2015: Challenging Methods.” Leuphana Centre for Digital Cultures. Available online: http://cdc.leuphana.com/news/news/blog-article/dcrl-mecs-summer-school-2015-challenging-methods/

Tholen, G. C. 2002. “Media Metaphorology: Irritations in the Epistemic Field of Media Studies.” South Atlantic Quarterly 101(3): 659–672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00382876-101-3-659

Uricchio, W. 1981. “The Motion Picture as a Resource for Industrial Archaeology.” Industrial Archaeology 3: 233–237.

Vogl, J. 2008. “Becoming-Media: Galileo’s Telescope.” Grey Room 29: 14–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/grey.2007.1.29.14

Williams, R. 2005 [1978]. “Problems of Materialism.” In Culture and Materialism: Selected Essays, by R. Williams, 103–122. London: Verso.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-02

Issue

Section

Forum

How to Cite

Wythoff, G. (2015). Artifactual Interpretation. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 2(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v2i1.27061