Recontextualizing the referent
An iterative approach to composition and collective music-making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jazz.28262Keywords:
referent, textility, notated scores as scripts, heteroglossia, boundary objectsAbstract
This article investigates the musical text within an original-music project, aligning manifold perspectives on this with a practice-led research endeavour. Some form of text is central to musical engagements involving jazz musicians, in the form of lead sheets, arrangements of existing repertoire, original compositions and, more abstractly, subjective understandings of canon common to the community. Central to this article is the extent to which text influences the synergy of a musical situation and how different musicians within an ensemble interpret the same material. By coupling historical and synchronic perceptions of the musical text with my own practice, I offer insights on how improvising musicians negotiate the potential autonomy of a composition whilst offering their own perspectives. During collaboration, musicians create a context-specific approach to music-making, accommodating social and intra-musical influences. This article aligns existing narratives on authorship and materiality with jazz practice, suggesting overlaps with textility, and notated scores such as scripts, heteroglossia and boundary objects.
References
Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bazerman, C. (2004) ‘Intertextuality: How Texts Rely on Other Texts’. In What Writing Does and How It Does It, ed. C. Bazerman and P. P. Prior, 309–339. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Becker, H. (1976) ‘Art Worlds and Social Types’. American Behavioral Scientist 19/6: 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427601900603
Bencherki, N. (2017) ‘Actor–Network Theory’. In The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication, ed. C. Scott and L. Lewis, 1–13. New York: Wiley. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc002
Berliner, P. (1994) Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Blade, B. (2008) Seasons of Changes. Verve Records. CD.
Bollas, C. (1992) Being a Character: Psychoanalysis and Self Experience. New York: Hill and Wang.
Butterfield, M. (2002) ‘The Musical Object Revisited’. Music Analysis 21/3: 327–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2249.00170
Campbell, D. T. (2005) ‘Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fish-Scale Model of Omniscience’. In Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Emerging Cognitive Science, ed. S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn and M. A. Gernsbacher, 3–21. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carpenter, P. (1967) ‘The Musical Object’. Current Musicology 5: 56–87. https://doi.org/10.7916/cm.v0i5.3685
Carter, R. (2020) ‘The Secret to Some of Miles Davis’s Best Recordings? No Rehearsal’. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/the-secret-to-some-of-miles-davis-best-recordings-no-rehearsal/12439/
Cook, N. (2001) ‘Between Process and Product: Music and/as Performance’. Society for Music Theory 7/2: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30535/mto.7.2.1
Currie, S. (2014) ‘Scenes, Personae and Meaning: Symbolic Interactionist Semiotics of Jazz Improvisation’. In Revisiting Symbolic Interaction in Music Studies and New Interpretive Works, ed. N. K. Denzin, 37–50. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 42. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
De Nora, T. (1999) ‘Music as a Technology of the Self’. Poetics 27/1: 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00017-0
Fischer, G., E. Giaccardi, H. Eden, M. Sugimoto and Y. Ye (2005) Beyond Binary Choices: Integrating Individual and Social Creativity’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63/4–5: 482–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.014
Friedman, A. M. (2014) ‘Momentum: A Phenomenology of Musical Flow and Meaning’. Doctoral diss., Harvard University.
Gellrich, M., and J. Kenny (2002) ‘Improvisation’. In The Science and Psychology of Music Performance: Creative Strategies for Teaching and Learning, ed. R. Parncutt and G. E. McPherson, 117–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Godlovitch, S. (1998) Musical Performance: A Philosophical Study. London: Routledge.
Goehr, L. (1992) The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in the Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hersch, C. (2008) ‘Unfinalizable Dialog and Self-Expression in Jazz’. In The Routledge Companion to Jazz Studies, ed. N. Gebhardt, N. Rustin-Paschal and T. Whyton, 1st edn. New York: Routledge.
Hodson, R. (2007) Interaction, Improvisation, and Interplay in Jazz. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2010) ‘The Textility of Making’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34/1: 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep042
Ingold, T. (2013) Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.
Iyer, V. (2004) ‘Exploding the Narrative in Jazz Improvisation’. https://jazzstudiesonline.org/files/jso/resources/pdf/IYER--Exploding%20the%20Narrative.pdf
Jarrett, K. (1974) Treasure Island. Impulse! [AS-9274].
Johnson, M. (1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. (2002) ‘How Jazz Musicians Improvise’. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 19/3: 415–42. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2002.19.3.415
Jordanous, A., and B. Keller (2012) ‘What Makes Musical Improvisation Creative?’ Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies 6/2: 151–75.
Law, J. (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
MacDonald, R., and G. Wilson (2020) The Art of Becoming: How Group Improvisation Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mehldau, B. (2021) ‘Miguel Zenon in conversation with Brad Mehldau’. https://jazzgallery.org/calendar/in-conversation-brad-mehldau
Mingus, C. (1956) Liner notes, Pithecanthropus Erectus. LP. Atlantic 1237. http://albumlinernotes.com/Pithecanthropus_Erectus.html
Monson, I. (1996) Saying Something: Jazz Improvisation and Interaction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Murphy, E. (2010) ‘Traditions: Some Considerations of Ingold’s “The Textility of Making” in Archaeological Production Contexts’. Studio Michael Shanks – Stanford. https://web.stanford.edu/group/archaeolog/cgi-bin/archaeolog/2010/12/30/the-complexity-of-making-within-disciplinary-traditions-some-considerations-of-ingolds-the-textility-of-making-in-archaeological-production-contexts/
Nettl, B. (1974) ‘Thoughts on Improvisation: A Comparative Approach’. The Musical Quarterly 60/1: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/mq/LX.1.1
Östersjö, S. (2017) ‘Thinking-Through-Music: On Knowledge Production, Materiality, Embodiment and Subjectivity in Artistic Research’. In Artistic Research in Music: Discipline and Resistance, ed. J. Impett, 88–107. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Padmanabhan, M. (2014) ‘Bakhtin’s Theory of Heteroglossia/Intertextuality in Teaching Academic Writing in Higher Education’. Journal of Academic Language & Learning 8/3: A101–A112.
Potter, C. (2018) ‘Chris Potter Interviewed by Pablo Held’. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auwxIt6WiXU
Pressing, J. (1984) ‘Cognitive Processes in Improvisation’. In Cognitive Processes in the Perception of Art, ed. W. Ray Crozier and A. J. Chapman, 345–63. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sartwell, C. (1992) ‘Process and Product: A Theory of Art’. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 6/4: 301–316. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25670046
Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London and New York: Routledge. https://rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/lecturenotes/DDM110%20CAS/Schoen-1983%20Reflective%20Practitioner.pdf
Shorter, W. (1976) Native Dancer. CBS – CBS 80721.
Small, C. (1999) ‘Musicking—the Meanings of Performing and Listening. A Lecture’. Music Education Research 1/1: 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461380990010102
Toynbee, J. (2016) Making Popular Music: Musicians, Creativity and Institutions. London: Bloomsbury.
Treitler, L. (2019) ‘On Patricia Carpenter’s “The Musical Object”’. Current Musicology 5: 87–93. https://doi.org/10.7916/cm.v0i5.3686
Waters, K. (2019) Postbop Jazz in the 1960s: The Compositions of Wayne Shorter, Herbie Hancock, and Chick Corea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
