Interaction, asymmetries of knowledge and experience and the impact of theory on the in situ practice of coaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.22905Keywords:
authority, coaching, epistemics, experience, theory, ventriloquismAbstract
Coaching is often presented as an equitable working alliance between a coach who has theory-driven expert knowledge and a coachee who has knowledge of himself/herself. However, whilst this assumption is widely promoted in coaching literature, little research has sought to investigate the in situ practice of coaching in which these different territories of knowledge are negotiated. Using Cooren’s notion of communication as a form of ventriloquism as an approach to the analysis of data taken from a corpus of 21 naturally occurring career coaching interactions, the purpose of this paper is to investigate how the coach’s mobilisation of theory impacts the in situ practice of career coaching. The findings indicate that the interplay of the coach’s theory-driven knowledge and the coachee’s experience-driven knowledge is not necessarily as harmonious as the coaching literature assumes. We close the paper by advocating a critical approach to analysing coaching interaction that may have payoff for practice.
References
Bourgoin, Alaric and Nicolas Bencherki (2013) The Performance of Authority in Organizations: An Example from Management Consulting. Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Working Paper 29. Paris: Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation Mines ParisTech. https://www.csi.minesparis.psl.eu/working-papers/DLWP.php?wp=WP_CSI_029.pdf https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.10055abstract
Cameron, Kim and Robert Quinn (1999) Diagnosing and Changing Organisational Culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Clifton, Jonathan, Geert Jacobs, Julia Valeiras-Jurado and Astrid Vandendaele (2022) Governmentality-in-action: The pursuit of happiness and identity-work in graduate career coaching interaction. Language and Dialogue 12 (3): 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00117.cli
Clifton, Jonathan, Dorien Van De Mieroop and Prachee Sehgal (2018) The multimodal enactment of deontic and epistemic authority in Indian meetings. Pragmatics 28 (3): 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17011.cli
Cooren, François (2010) Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6
Fillery-Travis, Anette and Elaine Cox (2014) Researching coaching. In Elaine Cox, Tatiana Bachkirova and David Clutterbuck (eds) The Complete Handbook of Coaching, 445–459. London: Sage.
Graf, Eva-Maria (2011) ‘Yes then I will tell you maybe a little bit about the procedure’ – Constructing professional identity where there is not yet a profession: The case of executive coaching. In Jo Angouri and Meredith Marra (eds) Constructing Identities at Work, 127–148. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360051_7
Graf, Eva-Maria (2019) The Pragmatics of Executive Coaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.303
Graf, Eva-Maria, Frédérick Dionne and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy (2020) How to investigate the local and global change potential of questioning sequences in executive coaching? A call for interdisciplinary research. Scandinavian Studies in Language 11 (1): 214–238. https://doi.org/10.7146/sss.v11i1.121368
Heller, Monica (2007) Distributed knowledge, distributed power: A sociolinguistics of structuration. Text & Talk 27 (5–6): 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.029
Heritage, John (2012) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
Latour, Bruno (1996) On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity 3 (4): 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
Latour, Bruno (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lukes, Steven (1979) Power and authority. In Tom Bottomore and Robert Nisbet (eds) A History of Sociological Analysis, 633–676. New York: Basic Books.
Maynard, Douglas and Steven Clayman (2003) Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. In Larry Reynolds and Nancy Herman-Kinney (eds) Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, 173–202. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
Pomerantz, Anita (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.008
Rettinger, Sabine (2011) Construction and display of competence and (professional) identity in coaching interactions. Journal of Business Communication 48 (4): 426–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943611414540
Sacks, Harvey (1992) Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I & II. London: Basil Blackwell.
Sator, Marlene and Eva-Maria Graf (2014) Making one’s path while walking with a clear head. In Eva-Maria Graf, Marlene Sator and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy (eds) Discourses of Helping Professions, 91–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.252.05sat
Sneijder, Petra and Hedwig te Molder (2006) Disputing food taste: Food pleasure as an achievement in interaction. Appetite 46 (1): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.10.002
ten Have, Paul (2007) Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide (2nd edition). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895
Vásquez, Consuelo and François Cooren (2013) Spacing practices: The communicative configuration of organizing through space-times. Communication Theory 23 (1): 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12003
Weber, Max (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Yates, Julia (2018) The Career Coaching Toolkit. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315164922
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
