Ethics of access in contemporary applied linguistics projects
New challenges in the researcher–practitioner relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.20129Keywords:
research ethics, ethics of access, communication ethics, multi-agency projects, microethics, researcher-practitioner relationshipAbstract
Increasingly, contemporary research practice is taking place in complex, multi-agency projects with funding from various public agencies and high demands for social relevance. The researcher–practitioner relationship, especially between researchers and stakeholders, plays a vital role in these kinds of projects, representing new challenges for many researchers. Within this field, issues relating to research ethics gain importance beyond established guidelines and institutional regulations. The aim of this paper is to contribute to a methodological debate on research ethics, highlighting the complex communicative practices that constitute the micro-ethics of the early stages of research, in which access to research sites and empirical data is at stake. We discuss three such activities in a project studying professional practice in welfare: (1) joint problematization of key issues; (2) negotiation of the research topic with multiple stakeholders; and (3) collaborative response to emerging ethical dilemmas. By opening up the often-neglected micro-ethical practices of research, we discuss how reflexivity and critical engagement might support the researcher’s ethical practices in complex project surroundings. By fostering increased awareness of ethically important moments in the early stages of the research process, researchers might be better prepared to negotiate the many communicative events that form an integral part of the practices of research ethics.
References
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Brumfit, Christopher (1997) How applied linguistics is the same as any other science. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7 (1): 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1997.tb00107.x
Bygate, Martin (2004) Some current trends in applied linguistics: Towards a generic view. AILA Review 17 (1): 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.17.04byg
Candlin, Christopher N. and Sally Candlin (2003) Health care communication: A problematic site for applied linguistics research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 23: 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190503000230
Candlin, Sally (2003) Issues arising when the professional workplace is the site of applied linguistic research. Applied Linguistics 24 (3): 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.3.386
Cicourel, Aaron V. (2003) On contextualizing applied linguistics research in the workplace. Applied Linguistics 24 (3): 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.3.360
Copland, Fiona (2018) Reflecting on the ethics of researching communication in superdiverse contexts. In Angela Creese and Adrian Blackledge (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity, 133–146. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696010-11
Copland, Fiona and Angela Creese (2015) Ethical issues in linguistic ethnography. In Peter I. De Costa (ed.) Ethics in Applied Linguistics Research: Language Researcher Narratives. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816937-10
Dall, Tanja and Sophie Danneris (2019) Reconsidering ‘what works’ in welfare-to-work with the vulnerable unemployed: The potential of relational causality as an alternative approach. Social Policy and Society 18 (4): 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746419000186
De Costa, Peter I. (ed.) (2016) Ethics in Applied Linguistics Research: Language Researcher Narratives. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816937
De Costa, Peter I., Scott Sterling, Jongbong Lee, Wendy Li and Hima Rawal (2021) Research tasks on ethics in applied linguistics. Language Teaching 54 (1): 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000257
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE.
Gobo, Giampietro (2011) Ethnography. In D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research (3rd edition), 15–34. London: SAGE.
Goffman, Erving (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishing
Goodwin, Charles (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633. https://doi.org/10.2307/682303
Guillemin, Marilys and Lynn Gillam (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry 10 (2): 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
Hagelund, Anniken (2018) No factory for dreams: Street-level bureaucrats between activation targets and user orientation. In Fredrik Engelstad, Cathrine Holst and Gunnar C. Aakvaag (eds) Democratic State and Democratic Society: Institutional Change in the Nordic Model, 296–311. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open Poland. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110634082-015
Hak, Tony (1999) ‘Text’ and ‘con-text’: Talk bias in studies of health work. In Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order, 427–451. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375.4.427
Halvorsen, Kristin, Marit Olave Riis-Johansen, Ellen Andenæs and Gøril Thomassen Hammerstad (2018) UTVEI – Utvikling av veiledningssamtalen i NAV. Forskningsbasert utviklingsarbeid for og med veiledere [Report: Exploring service user interaction in NAV. Research-based development work for and with counsellors]. Trondheim: NTNU. Online: https://www.ntnu.no/documents/1274006046/1276246524/UTVEI_Rapport+2018_enkeltsider.pdf/70971648-f505-43eb-afff-70226baaa304
Halvorsen, Kristin and Gøril Thomassen Hammerstad (2021) Mellom ansvarliggjøring og autonomi: Tilskriving av ansvar i interaksjon mellom brukere og veiledere i den norske arbeids- og velferdsetaten (NAV) [Between responsibilisation and autonomy: Ascribing responsibility in service user–counsellor interaction in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration]. Språk och Interaktion 5 (5): 93–114. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/333439
Hansen, Hans-Tore, Kjetil Lundberg and Liv Johanne Syltevik (2018) Digitalization, streetlevel bureaucracy and welfare users’ experiences. Social Policy & Administration 52 (1): 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12283
Hessels, Laurens K. and Harro van Lente (2008) Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy 37 (4): 740–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008
Kara, Helen (2018) Research Ethics in the Real World: Euro-Western and Indigenous Perspectives. Bristol, UK: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447344780
Kubanyiova, Magdalena (2008) Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. Modern Language Journal 92 (4): 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00784.x
Lillis, Teresa (2015) Introduction. AILA Review 28 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.001int
Lincoln, Yvonna S. and Egon G. Guba (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Lægreid, Per and Lise H. Rykkja (2015) Hybrid collaborative arrangements: The welfare administration in Norway – between hierarchy and network. Public Management Review 17 (7): 960–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1029349
Macbeth, Douglas (2001) On ‘reflexivity’ in qualitative research: Two readings, and a third. Qualitative Inquiry 7 (1): 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700103
Maryns, Katrijn and Marie Jacobs (2021) Data constitution and engagement with the field of asylum and migration. Journal of Pragmatics 178: 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.008
McAreavey, Ruth and Chaitali Das (2013) A delicate balancing act: Negotiating with gatekeepers for ethical research when researching minority communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 12 (1): 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200102
Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation (2019) One Digital Public Sector: Digital Strategy for the Public Sector 2019–2025. Oslo: Ministry of Local Government and Modernization. Online: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/one-digitalpublic-sector/id2653874/
Nowotny, Helga (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pérez-Milans, Miguel (2017) Reflexivity and social change in applied linguistics. AILA Review 29 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.29.01per
Rampton, M. B. H. (1992) Scope for empowerment in sociolinguistics. In Deborah Cameron, Elizabeth Frazer, Penelope Harvey, M. B. H. Rampton and Kay Richardson (eds) Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method, 29–61. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436246-2
Reeves, Carla L. (2010) A difficult negotiation: Fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research 10 (3): 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109360150
Research Council of Norway (2020) The Centres for Research-Based Innovation Scheme. Online: https://www.forskningsradet.no/en/apply-for-funding/funding-from-the-researchcouncil/sfi/
Roberts, Celia (2003) Applied linguistics applied. In Srikant Sarangi and Theo Van Leeuwen (eds) Applied linguistics and Communities of Practice, 137–154. British Studies in Applied Linguistics 18. London: British Association for Applied Linguistics, in association with Continuum.
Roberts, Celia and Srikant Sarangi (2003) Uptake of discourse research in interprofessional settings: Reporting from medical consultancy. Applied Linguistics 24 (3): 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.3.338
Ryen, Anne (2011) Ethics and qualitative research. In David Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research: Issues of Theory, Method and Practice (3rd edition), 416–438. London: SAGE.
Røhnebæk, Maria (2012) Standardized flexibility: The choreography of ICT in standardization of service work. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research 4 (4): 679–698. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124679
Røysum, Anita (2013) The reform of the welfare services in Norway: One office – one way of thinking? European Journal of Social Work 16 (5): 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.722982
Sarangi, Srikant (2005) The conditions and consequences of professional discourse studies. Journal of Applied Linguistics 2 (3): 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v2i3.371
Sarangi, Srikant (2007) Editorial. The anatomy of interpretation: Coming to terms with the analyst’s paradox in professional discourse studies. Text and Talk 27 (5–6): 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.025
Sarangi, Srikant (2009) On displacement and engagement: The embedding of applied linguistics and professional practice studies. Journal of Applied Linguistics 6 (2): 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v6i2.27612
Sarangi, Srikant (2015) Experts on experts: Sustaining ‘communities of interest’ in professional discourse studies. In Maurizio Gotti, Stefania Maria Maci and Michele Sala (eds) Insights into Medical Communication, 25–47. New York: Peter Lang.
Sarangi, Srikant (2019) Communication research ethics and some paradoxes in qualitative inquiry. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 12 (1): 94–121. https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.36885
Sarangi, Srikant and Christopher N. Candlin (2003) Introduction. Trading between reflexivity and relevance: New challenges for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 24 (3): 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.3.271
Sarangi, Srikant and Celia Roberts (eds) (1999) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375
Shaw, Ian (2008) Ethics and the practice of qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work 7 (4): 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325008097137
Starfield, Sue (2013) Researcher reflexivity. In Carol A. Chapelle (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 1–7. Malden, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1011
Sterling, Scott and Susan Gass (2017) Exploring the boundaries of research ethics: Perceptions of ethics and ethical behaviors in applied linguistics research. System 70: 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.010
Tolich, Martin and Maureen H. Fitzgerald (2006) If ethics committees were designed for ethnography. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1 (2): 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2006.1.2.71
Van de Ven, Andrew H. (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zhu, Hong and Synnøve T. Andersen (2021) ICT-mediated social work practice and innovation: Professionals’ experiences in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Nordic Social Work Research 11 (4): 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1740774
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
