The ethics of engagement
Research relationships in an applied linguistics partnership with a professional medical body
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.20074Keywords:
Ethics, Relational ethics, Partnerships, Research relationships, practitioner collaborationAbstract
This paper considers the ethical dimensions of interprofessional research relationships in applied linguistics, an area that has perhaps received less attention than other types of engaged research in the field. As a discipline, applied linguistics has considered how research can be conducted ethically with participants, mindful of benefiting those who are the subjects of research. However, research in professional and institutional contexts involves complex relationships with multiple parties, where research ‘with’ different participants and professional groups raises ethical considerations about who benefits and who does not. A case study provided from a project in medical education, looking at differential attainment in an examination for UK general practitioners (GP), demonstrates these difficulties in a particularly politicised setting. Various relationships are examined in turn, from the early stages of becoming involved in local activity and establishing data collection, through to the involvement of ‘key informants’, analytic sessions with the practitioners and incorporating the perspectives of the GP trainees in developing educational interventions. Such relationships require negotiation between all parties, making it difficult for the researcher always to claim ‘independence’ and requiring ongoing ethical decisions about roles and obligations. Nevertheless, engaging in these relational activities is itself argued to be part of the ethical conduct for interprofessional research.
References
BAAL [British Association for Applied Linguistics] (2021) Recommendations on Good Practice in Applied Linguistics. Online: https://www.baal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/BAAL-Good-Practice-Guidelines-2021.pdf
Beauchamp, Tom L. and James F. Childress (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bernard, Harvey Russell (2018) Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Brown, James D. (2004) Research methods for applied linguistics: Scope, characteristics and standards. In Alan Davies and Catherine Elder (eds) The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 476–500. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Bucholtz, Mary, Dolores Inés Casillas and Jin Sook Lee (2017) Beyond empowerment: Accompaniment and sociolinguistic justice in a youth research program. In Robert Lawson and Dave Sayers (eds) Sociolinguistic Research: Application and Impact, 25–44. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671765-3
Cameron, Deborah, Elizabeth Frazer, Penelope Harvey, M. B. H. Rampton and Kay Richardson (1992) Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. London: Routledge.
Candlin, Christopher and Srikant Sarangi (2004) Making applied linguistics matter. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1i1.1
Cook, Guy (2012) British applied linguistics: Impacts of and impacts on. Applied Linguistics Review 3 (1): 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0002
ESRC [Economic and Social Research Council] (2015) ESRC Framework for Research Ethics. Online: http://esrc.ukri.org/files/funding/guidance-for-applicants/esrc-framework-forresearch-ethics-2015/
ESRC [Economic and Social Research Council] (2021) Our expectations for research collaboration. Online [accessed 26th May 2022]: https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/guidance-for-applicants/research-ethics-guidance/researchers-and-research-teams/ourexpectations-for-research-collaboration/
Fadden, Lorna and Lawrence M. Solan (2015) Expert witness communication. In Gavin Oxburgh, Trond Myklebust, Tim Grant and Rebecca Milne (eds) Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts: Integrated Approaches from Forensic Psychology, Linguistics and Law Enforcement, 209–228. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118769133.ch10
Frazer, Elizabeth (1992) Talking about gender, race and class. In Deborah Cameron, Elizabeth
Frazer, Penelope Harvey, M. B. H. Rampton and Kay Richardson (eds) Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method, 90–112. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436246-4
Fricker, Miranda (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Hammersley, Martyn and Paul Atkinson (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
Hymes, Dell (1980) Language in Education: Ethnolinguistic Essays. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Iedema, Rick and Andreas Xyrichis (2021) Video-reflexive ethnography (VRE): A promising methodology for interprofessional collaborative practice research. Journal of Interprofessional Care 35 (4): 487–489. https://doi.org.10.1080/13561820.2021.1943124
Labov, William (1982) Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English Trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society 11 (2): 165–201. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0047404500009192
Lawson, Robert and Dave Sayers (2017) Where we’re going, we don’t need roads. In Robert Lawson and Dave Sayers (eds) Sociolinguistic Research: Application and Impact, 7–22. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671765-2
Marshall, Martin N. (1996) The key informant technique. Family Practice 13 (1): 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.1.92
Mohanna, Kay (2017) A Description of Some of the Features of General Practice Consultations in a Clinic in India with Reference to the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) of the United Kingdom Royal College of General Practitioners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University College London, London.
Nind, Melanie (2011) Participatory data analysis: A step too far? Qualitative Research 11 (4): 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111404310
O’Reilly, Karen (2009) Key Concepts in Ethnography. London: Sage.
Rampton, Ben, Janet Maybin and Celia Roberts (2015) Theory and method in linguistic ethnography. In Julia Snell, Sara Shaw and Fiona Copland (eds) Linguistic Ethnography, 14–50. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035035_2
Roberts, Celia (2021) Linguistic Penalties and the Job Interview. London: Equinox.
Roberts, Celia, Sarah Atkins and Kamila Hawthorne (2014) Performance Features in Clinical Skills Assessment: Linguistic and cultural factors in the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners Examination. London: King’s College London with the University of Nottingham.
Roberts, Celia and Srikant Sarangi (1999) Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: Issues of practical relevance for the researcher. In Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, 473–503. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375.4.473
Roberts, Celia and Srikant Sarangi (2003) Uptake of discourse research in interprofessional settings: Reporting from medical consultancy. Applied Linguistics 24 (3): 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.3.338
Rolfe, Alexandra, Sarah Atkins, Kamila Hawthorne and Celia Roberts (2015) The Insider’s Guide to the Clinical Skills Assessment for the MRCGP. London: Royal College of General Practitioners Press.
Sarangi, Srikant (2015) Experts on experts: Sustaining communities of interest in professional discourse studies. In Maurizio Gotti, Stefania Maci and Michele Sala (eds) Insights into Medical Communication, 25–47. Bern: Peter Lang.
Sarangi, Srikant (2019) Communication research ethics and some paradoxes in qualitative inquiry. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 12 (1): 94–121. https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.36885
Sarangi, Srikant, Angus Clarke, Kristina Bennert and Lucy Howell (2003) Categorisation practices across professional boundaries: Some analytic insights from genetic counselling. In Srikant Sarangi and Theo van Leeuwen (eds) Applied Linguistics and Communities of Practice, 150–168. London: Continuum.
Silverman, Jonathan, Suzanne Kurtz and Juliet Draper (2013) Skills for Communicating with Patients (3rd Edition). London: CRC Press.
Tomlinson, Barbara and George Lipsitz (2013) American studies as accompaniment. American Quarterly 65 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2013.0009
Wolfram, Walt (2017) Public sociolinguistic education in the United States: A proactive, comprehensive program. In Robert Lawson and Dave Sayers (eds) Sociolinguistic Research: Application and Impact, 107–128. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671765-6
Woodhead, Martin and Dorothy Faulkner (2000) Subjects, objects or participants: Dilemmas of psychological research with children. In Pia Christensen and Allison James (eds) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, 10–39. London: Falmer.
World Medical Association (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki:Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 310 (20): 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
