Reflections on the procedural and practical ethics in researching professional social work writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.20014Keywords:
regulatory frameworks, codified ethics, research collaboration, professional writingAbstract
This paper explores the procedural ethics and ethics in practice involved in a multi-agency research project exploring professional social work writing. Drawing on institutional documentation and a researcher’s field notes over two years, the requirements and processes involved in complying with academia-facing and agency-facing regulatory frameworks are summarised and challenges highlighted. The main part of the paper centres on ethics in practice, building on Sarangi’s framework for articulating the communicative dimensions to research ethics, and foregrounding the importance of ongoing dialogue between researchers and participant-stakeholders. Reflective accounts from three participant-stakeholders illustrate the interrelationship between what are often presumed to be distinct moments of a research chronology – access, representation and dissemination – in the process of knowledge making. The paper concludes by highlighting the differences between academia- and agency-facing procedural ethics, and arguing for greater institutional recognition of ethics in practice, in particular the importance of ongoing dialogue between researchers and participant-stakeholders at all stages of the research process.
References
Annas, George and Michael A. Grodin (1995) The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremburg code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. OUP. New York:
Bauman, Z. (2000) ‘Am I My Brother’s Keeper?’. European Journal of Social Work 3(1): 5–11.
Barton, David and Mary Hamilton (1998) Local Literacies. London: Routledge.
Beauvoir, Simone de (1976 [1947]) The Ethics of Ambiguity. New York: Citadel Press.
Biros, Michelle H. Mark Hauswald and Jill Baren, (2010) Introduction, Special Issue, Procedural Versus practical ethics Academic Emergency Medicine. 989-990.
Bruce, Margaret (2014) The Voice of the Child in Child Protection: Whose Voice?
Social Sciences. 3(3), 514-526;
Candlin, Chris N. (2009) Preface. In Vijay Bhatia, Winnie Cheng, Bertha Du-Babcock and Jane Lung (eds) Language for Professional Communication: Research, Practice and Training, 6–0. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Candlin, Christopher N. and Srikant Sarangi (2004) Editorial: Making applied linguistics matter. Journal of Applied Linguistics. 1 (1): 1–8.
Copland, Fiona & Angela Creese. 2015b. Ethical issues in linguistic ethnography: Balancing
the micro and the macro. In De Costa, P. I. (ed.) Ethics in Applied Linguistics Research: Language Researcher Narratives. 138-154. New York: Routledge.
Denzin, Norman, K. (2017) Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry 23(1): 8–16.
Gitelman, Lisa (ed) (2013) Raw Data is an Oxymoron. Massachusetts: MIT Press Cambridge.
Guillemin M, Gillam L.(2004) Ethics, reflexivity and ‘‘ethically important moments’’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry. 10:261–80.
Kubanyiova, Maggie. (2008) Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics:
the tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. Modern Language Journal, 92(4). 503 -18.
Mallinson, Christin (2018) Ethics in linguistic research in Lia Litosseliti (ed). Research Methods in Linguistics, London: Bloomsbury. 57-84.
Russell, Lisa and Ruth Barley (2020) Ethnography, ethics and ownership of data, Ethnography, , 1: 5-25.
Hammersley, Martyn (2010) Creeping Ethical Regulation and the Strangling of Research, Sociological Research Online. 15 (4) https://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/4/16.html
Hammersley, Martyn. and Anna Traianou (2012) Ethics and Educational Research, British Educational Research Association on-line resource. Available on-line at https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethics-and-educational-research
Hammersley, M. and Anna Traianou (2014) An Alternative Ethics? Justice and Care as Guiding Principles for Qualitative Research, Sociological Research Online.19 (3), 24.
Markham, Annette N.and Elizabeth Buchanan. 2015. Ethical considerations in digital research contexts. In Wright, James (ed.). Encyclopedia for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier Press, pp. 606-613.
Marina Morgenshtern and Nilan Yu (2020) Who owns the case record? Client access to case records in Canadian social work practice, International Social Work. 63 (3): 337-350
Noddings, Nel (2003) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, Second edition, Berkeley CA, University of California Press.
O'Reilly, L. and Pat Dolan (2016) The Voice of the Child in Social Work Assessments: Age-
Appropriate Communication with Children The British Journal of Social Work, 46, (5):1191–1207.
Sarangi, Srikant (2012) Applied linguistics and professional discourse studies. Linguística Aplicada das Profissões 16 (1): 1–18.
Srikant Sarangi (2015@2019) Communication research ethics and some
paradoxes in qualitative inquiry, JALPP, 12.1: 94–121
Sarangi, S. and Chris Candlin, C. N. (2001) Motivational relevancies: some methodological
reflections on social theoretical and sociolinguistic practice. In N. Coupland, S. Sarangi and C. N. Candlin (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Pearson, 350- 388.
Sarangi, Srikant and Chis N. Candlin (2010) Editorial. Applied linguistics and professional practice: mapping a future agenda. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional practice 7 (1): 1–9.
Shils, Edward (1968) Intellectuals. In E. Shils (ed.) International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. 7 399-415. New York: Macmillan.
Strohm Kitchener, Karen & Richard F. Kitchener (2013) Social Science Research Ethics: Historical and Philosophical Issues in Donna M. Mertens and Pauline E. Ginsberg eds The Handbook of Social Research Ethics. Sage
Tagg, Caroline, Lyons, Agnieszka, Hu, Rachel and Rock, Frances (2016) The ethics of digital
ethnography in a team project. Applied Linguistics Review 8 (2-3): 271-292.
Tineke A. Abma, Tina Cook, Margaretha Rämgård, Elisabeth Kleba, Janet Harris & Nina Wallerstein (2017) Social impact of participatory health research: collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization, Educational Action Research, 25 (4): 489-505.
White, Cynthia, Janet Holmes and Vijay Bhatia (2019) Trading places, creating spaces: Chris Candlin’s contribution to aligning research and practice. Language Teaching (52): 476–489.
Wilson Andrew and Philip Hodgson (2012) Trust, coercion and care: Researching marginalised groups. In: Love K (ed.) Ethics in Social Research. Bingley: Emerald Press. 118-128.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
