Reported speech in problem telling
Doing epistemic and moral work in parent–teacher conferences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.18940Keywords:
Parent-teacher conference, Reported Speech, school-family communication, moral work, teachers’ epistemic and deontic authorityAbstract
Like many institutional interactions, parent–teacher conferences are impregnated with a socially sanctioned distribution of epistemic and deontic rights. However, who has the right to know, to assess and to make decisions is less an overarching structural dimension than an interactional local accomplishment. This paper reports data from a research project on parent–teacher conferences that investigated the interactional constitution of a phenomenon increasingly reported by teachers: loss of authority, the systematic delegitimisation of their role. Adopting a conversation-analysis informed approach to a single case study concerning a nine-year-old child, I describe a specific resource – reported speech in problem telling – displayed by the mother during the dialogic phase of the second conference of the school year. We illustrate how, through this conversational resource, the mother accomplishes epistemic and moral work. After making information from her territory of knowledge more relevant than information provided by the teachers, she (1) provides incontestable evidential bases to her ‘problem trajectory’, (2) makes it prevail over the teacher’s ‘no-problem’ trajectory and (3) undermines the teacher’s epistemic authority by vicariously blaming her work. In the discussion, we suggest that the mother’s interactive competence in doing epistemic and moral work can explain why she succeeds in shaping the teacher’s professional conduct. In making the case for microanalysis-based teacher training, in the conclusion we discuss some applied implications of the study.
References
Arminen, Ikka (2000) On the context sensitivity of institutional interaction. Discourse & Society 11 (4): 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011004001
Aronsson, Karin and Karin Osvaldsson (2013) Trust and the contestation of blame narratives: Veiled stances in an institutional assessment context. In Per Linell and Ivana Markova (eds) Dialogical Approaches to Trust in Communication, 29–49. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Baker, Carolyn and Jayne Keogh (1995) Accounting for achievement in parent-teacher interviews. Human Studies 18 (2–3): 263–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323213
Bergmann, Jorg R. (1998). Introduction: Morality in discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3–4): 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594
Brody, Linda E. and Carol J. Mills (1997) Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. US National Library of Medicine 30 (3): 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000304
Bronfenbrenner, Urie (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Caronia, Letizia and Chiara Dalledonne Vandini (2019) Assessing a (gifted) child in parent-teacher conference: Participants’ resources to pursue (and resist) a no-problem trajectory. Language and Dialogue 9 (1): 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00035.car
Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig (1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66 (4): 764–805. https://doi.org/10.2307/414729
Clift, Rebecca (2007) Getting there first: Non-narrative reported speech in interaction. In Elizabeth Holt and Rebecca Clift (eds) Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, 195–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clift, Rebecca and Elisabeth Holt (2007) Introduction. In Elizabeth Holt and Rebecca Clift (eds) Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coleman, Ruth, M. (2005) Academic strategies that work for gifted students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children 38 (1): 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503800105
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2007) Assessing and accounting. In Elizabeth Holt and Rebecca Clift (eds) Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, 81–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting (2017) Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139507318
Cromdal, Jacob and Michael Tholander (2015) Morality in Practice: Exploring Childhood, Parenthood and Schooling in Everyday Family Life. London: Equinox.
Dalby Landmark, Anne Marie, Pål Gulbrandsen and Jan Svennevig (2015) Whose decision? Negotiating epistemic and deontic rights in medical treatment decisions. Journal of Pragmatics 78: 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.007
Drew, Paul (1998) Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3–4): 295–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
Drew, Paul (2018) Epistemics in social interaction. Discourse Studies 20 (1): 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734347
Drew, Paul, John Heritage, Gene Lerner and Anita Pomerantz (2015) Talking about troubles: An introduction. In Gail Jefferson, Talking about Troubles in Conversation, edited by Paul Drew, John Heritage, Gene Lerner and Anita Pomerantz, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duranti, Alessandro and David Brenneis (1986) The audience as co-author: An introduction. In Alessandro Duranti and David Brenneis (eds) The Audience as Co-Author. Special issue of Text 6 (3): 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1986.6.3.239
Epstein, Joyce L. (2018) School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494673
Epstein, Joyce L. and Caren K. Salinas (2004) Partnering with families and communities: A well-organized program of family and community partnerships yields many benefits for schools and their students. Schools as Learning Community 61 (8): 12–18.
Epstein, Joyce L. and Mavis G. Sanders (2006) Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education 81 (2): 81–120. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930pje8102_5
Garfinkel, Harold and Lawrence Wieder (1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In Graham Watson and Robert M. Seiler (eds) Text in Context: Studies in Ethnomethodology, 175–206. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo
Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin (1992) Assessments and the construction of context. In Duranti Alessandro and Charles Goodwin (eds) Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, 147–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John (1999) Conversation analysis at century’s end: Practices of talk-in-interaction, their distributions, and their outcomes. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32 (1–2): 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI321&2_9
Heritage, John (2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
Heritage, John (2012b) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
Heritage, John and Steve Clayman (2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135
Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103
Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond (2006) The epistemics of social relationships: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society 35 (5): 677–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325
Holt, Elizabeth (1996) Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3): 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
Holt, Elizabeth (2007) I’m eyeing your chop on mind: Reporting and enacting. In Elizabeth Holt and Rebecca Clift (eds) Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, 47–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486654.004
Holt, Elizabeth and Rebecca Clift (eds) (2007) Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486654
Howard, Kathryn M. and Sarah Lipinoga (2010) Closing down openings: Pretextuality and misunderstanding in parent-teacher conferences with Mexican immigrant families. Language and Communication 30 (1): 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.10.004
Jefferson, Gail (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Jim Shenkhein (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, 219–248. New York: Academic Press.
Jefferson, Gail (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, 13–23. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Kotthoff, Helga (2015) Narrative constructions of school-oriented parenthood during parent-teacher-conferences. Linguistics and Education 31: 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.12.002
Labov, William and David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
Lambek, Michael (2010) Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press.
Lerner, Gene H. (1992) Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology 15: 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990328
Linell, Per and Rommetveit Ragnar (1998) The many forms and facets of morality in dialogue: Epilogue for the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3–4): 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683600
MacLure, Maggie and Barbara M. Walker (2000) Disenchanted evenings: The social organization of talk in parent-teacher consultations in UK secondary schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education 21 (1): 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690095135
Mayes, Patricia (1990) Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language 14 (2): 325–363. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.2.04may
Maynard, Douglas W. (2003) Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ochs, Elinor and Lisa Capps (2001) Living Narratives: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peräkylä, Anssi (1998) Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Social Psychological Quarterly 61 (4): 301–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787032
Peräkylä, Anssi and Sanna Vehviläinen (2003) Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society 14 (6): 727–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146003
Pillet-Shore, Danielle (2012) The problems with praise in parent–teacher interaction. Communication Monographs 79 (2): 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.672998
Pillet-Shore, Danielle (2015) Being a good parent in parent-teacher conferences. Journal of Communication 65 (2): 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12146
Rae, John and Joanne Kerby (2007) Designing context for reporting tactical talk. In Elizabeth Holt and Rebecca Clift (eds) Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, 179–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robles, Jessica S. (2015) Morality in discourse. In Karen Tracy, Cornelia Illie and Todd Sandel (eds) International Encyclopaedia of Language and Social Interaction, 132–137. Boston: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi081
Sacks, Harvey (1974) On the analyzability of stories by children. In Roy Turner (ed.) Ethno-methodology: Selected Readings, 216–232. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1993) Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (1): 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5
Schegloff, Emanuel (1997) Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23 (3): 499–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545001
Schegloff, Emanuel (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
Schön, Donald (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
Stevanovic, Melisa and Anssi Peräkylä (2012) Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
Stevanovic, Melisa and Jan Svennevig (2015) Introduction: Epistemics and deontics in conversational directives. Journal of Pragmatics 78: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.008
Stivers Tania, Lorenza Mondada and Jacob Steensig (eds) (2011) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stokoe, Elisabeth and Derek Edwards (2015) Mundane morality: Gender, categories and complaints in familial neighbour disputes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 9 (2): 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v9i2.25735
Tannen, Deborah (1989) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willemse, Martijn T., Jan Thompson, Ruben Vanderlinde and Trevor Mutton (2018) Family-school partnerships: A challenge for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching 44 (3): 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1465545
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
