A case study of the translation processes of five experienced translators in Malaysia

Authors

  • Kulwindr Kaur a/p Gurdial Singh University of Malaya
  • Kais Amir Khadim University of Malaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.20306

Keywords:

experienced translators, meaning, message, text types, translation process, skopos theory

Abstract

This qualitative study examines the translation processes involved in translating five kinds of documents – informative-cum-operative, political, legal, literary, and technical – by interviewing five experienced translators in Malaysia. The five interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed, and then matched against the translation processes proposed by Dolet (1997 [1540]), Nord (1991, 2002), Vinay and Darbelnet (2004 [1958]), Nida (1964), Newmark (1988), Vermeer (2004 [1989]), Bell (1991), and Darwish (2003). The findings show that the translators generally followed Darwish’s (2003) translation process and Nida’s formal and dynamic equivalence orientations, and that one of them used all of the five principles first identified by Dolet in the sixteenth century. All the interviewees agreed that they must be knowledgeable in the content that they are translating, be proficient in both languages they are working with, and know the cultures of both the source language (SL) speakers and the target language (TL) speakers in order to translate competently and naturally in the given context. They all agreed with Venuti’s ‘domestication’ approach (Venuti 1998, 2008; both discussed in Munday 2012: 218–225) and agreed with applying the skopos theory to ensure that their target readers are satisfied with their translation.

Author Biographies

Kulwindr Kaur a/p Gurdial Singh, University of Malaya

Kulwindr Kaur has a PhD in Translation, a Master’s in English as a Second Language (MESL), and a BA (Hons) in TESL. She is currently a Senior Lecturer at the University of Malaya. She has published nine books, several articles in refereed journals, and five chapters in edited books. Her areas of expertise are translation studies, error analysis, and TESL. She has taught at primary, secondary, and tertiary levels.

Kais Amir Khadim, University of Malaya

Kais Amir Kadhim holds an MA in Translation and a PhD in Linguistics and Translation from the University of Science Malaysia. He has published a number of articles on various translation issues, both on theory and practice in international journals, and has presented several conference papers. His latest book Style and Translation in Action is under review by the Edwin Mellen Press, of Lewiston, New York State. Besides his interest in the theoretical issues of translation, he also has special interests in fields such as political discourse of news texts, style, pragmatics, and discourse analysis.

References

Azizah Mokhzani (1984) The translation needs of a developing country: The Malaysian case. In Malaysian Translators Association (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Translation: The Role of Translation in National Development, 13–15 March 1984, 1–16. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Azman Che Mat (2010) Revisiting Arabic-Malay translation experience in Malaysia: A historical and contemporary account. Asian Culture and History 2 (2). Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ach/article/view/4391/5178

Baker, M. (2011) In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation: London and New York: Routledge.

Bardaji, A. G. (2009) Procedures, techniques, strategies: Translation process operators. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 17 (3): 161–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 09076760903249372

Bedeker, L. and Feinauer, I. (2006) The translator as cultural mediator. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 24 (2): 133–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/ 16073610609486412

Bell, R. (1991) Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice. London: Longman.

Berry, R. S. (1999) Collecting data by in-depth interviewing. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, 2–5 September 1999, University of Sussex at Brighton. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ documents/000001172.htm

Beylard-Ozeroff, A., Kralova, J. and Moser-Mercer, B. (eds) (1998) Translators’ Strategies and Creativity, Volume 27: Selected Papers from the 9th International Conference on Translation and Interpreting, Prague, September 1995. In Honor of Ji?í Levý and Anton Popovi?. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Cohen, L. and Manion, C. (1994) Triangulation. In L. Cohen and C. Manion, Research Methods in Education. London and New York: Routledge.

Darwish, A. (2003) The Transfer Factor: Selected Essays on Translation and Cross-cultural Communication. Melbourne, Australia: Writescope.

De Beaugrande, R. and Dressler, W. (1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.

Dolet, E. (1997 [1540]) How to translate well from one language into another. Trans. D. G. Ross in D. Robinson (ed.) Western Translation Theory from Herodotus to Nietzsche, 95–97. Manchester: St Jerome.

Catford, J. C (1965) A Linguistic Theory of Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ferdows, A. D. (2014) A Psychological Approach to Translation. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris.

Ghazala, H. (2008) Translation as Problems and Solutions. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar El-Ilm Lilmalayin.

Hatim, B. and Mason, I. (1990) Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.

Hatim, B. and Mason, I. (1997) The Translator As Communicator. London: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1985) Language, Context and Text: A Social Semiotic Perspective. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.

Hubscher-Davidson, S. E. (2009) Personal diversity and diverse personalities in translation: A study of individual differences. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 17 (3): 175–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09076760903249380

Kulwindr Kaur Sidhu (2006) Translating Scientific Texts: English to Malay. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.

Munday, J. (2012) Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. London and New York: Routledge.

Nida, E. A. (1964) Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: Brill.

Nida, E. A. and Taber, C. R. (1969) The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: Brill.

Newmark, P. (1981) Approaches to Translation. Oxford: Pergamon.

Newmark, P. (1988) A Textbook of Translation. New York: Prentice Hall.

Nord, C. (1991) Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-Oriented Text Analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Nord, C. (2002) Manipulation and loyalty in functional translation. Current Writing: Special Issue on Text and Reception in Southern Africa 14 (2): 32–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 1013929X.2002.9678123

Reiss, K. (1989 [1977]) Text-types, translation types and translation assessment. Trans. A. Chesterman in A. Chesterman (ed.) Readings in Translation Theory, 105–115, Helsingfors, Finland: Oy Finn Lectura Ab.

Reiss, K. (2000 [1971]) Translation Criticism: The Potentials and Limitations. Trans. E. Rhodes. London and New York: Routledge.

Reiss, K. (2004 [1981]) Type, kind and individuality of text: Decision making in translation. Trans. S. Kitron in L. Venuti (ed.) The Translation Studies Reader, 168–179. Second edition. London and New York: Routledge.

Reiss, K. and Vermeer, H. J. (2014 [1984]) Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained. Trans. C. Nord. London and New York: Routledge.

Schjoldager, A., with Gottlieb, H. and Klitgård, I. (2008) Understanding Translation. Aarhus: Academica.

Schleiermacher, F. (2012 [1813]) On the different methods of translating. Trans. S. Bernofsky in L. Venuti (ed.) The Translation Studies Reader, 43–63. Third Edition. London and New York: Routledge.

Snell-Hornby, M. (1988) Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Revised edition. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/z.38

Thomson-Wohlgemuth, G. (2004) A socialist approach to translation: A way forward? Meta: Journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal 49 (3): 498–510.

Venuti, L. (1998) The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference. London and New York: Routledge.

Venuti, L. (2008) The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. Second edition. Routledge: London and New York.

Vermeer, H. J. (2004 [1989]) Skopos and commission in translational action. Trans. A. Chesterman in L. Venuti (ed.) The Translation Studies Reader, 227–238. Second edition. London and New York: Routledge.

Vinay, J. P. and Darbelnet, J. (2004 [1958]) A methodology for translation. Trans. C. Sager and M. J. Hamel in L. Venuti (ed.) The Translation Studies Reader, 128–137. Second edition. London and New York: Routledge.

Wilss, W. (1982) The Science of Translation: Problems and Methods. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.

Zheng, B. (2012) The Role of Consultation Sources Revisited: An Empirical Study of English– Chinese Translation. London and New York: Routledge.

Zongxin, F. (2003) Literary discourse and the translator’s role. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 11 (1): 45–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2003.9961461

Published

2016-10-18

How to Cite

Gurdial Singh, K. K. a/p, & Khadim, K. A. (2016). A case study of the translation processes of five experienced translators in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 10(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.20306

Issue

Section

Articles