Institutional Policies, Professional Practices, and the Discourse of End-of-Life Discussions in American Medicine

Authors

  • Ellen Barton Wayne State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v2.i3.253

Keywords:

end-of-life discussions, medical discourse, end-of-life care, autonomy, medical futility

Abstract

The discourse analysis of end-of-life discussions presented here describes the interplay between the institutional order and interactional order in American medicine following Sarangi and Roberts (1999). In American hospitals, the institutional order of end-of-life discussions is accountable to a bioethics model of patient/surrogate autonomy for making medical decisions. In end-of-life care, medical futility is the basis for the decision to withdraw life support from a terminal patient; under autonomy in a bioethics model, this decision should be made primarily by the patient’s surrogate in consultation with the attending physician. The interactional order of discussions with patients’ families, however, is largely without accountability to institutional policies mandating autonomy, instead following the clinical and ethical standards of the profession of medicine, which preserve the determination of medical futility as a professional judgment and limit the scope of surrogate autonomy to an account of the patient’s wishes. In these discussions, physicians and families can be seen as constructing an ethics of emerging consensus as the basis for end-of-life decision-making.

Author Biography

Ellen Barton, Wayne State University

Ellen Barton received her PhD in Linguistics from Northwestern University. She is now Professor of Linguistics in the Department of English at Wayne State University. Her research interests in medical communication include end-of-life discussions, recruitment to clinical research, the discourse of specialty medical encounters, and, most recently, the emergence of ethical principles and deliberation in the interaction of medical encounters. A chapter on Ethics in Interaction will appear in the forthcoming Handbook of Applied Linguistics (Mouton de Gruyter).

References

42 USC 1395cc. (1992) Federal Patient Self-Determination Act. Interim Final Rule. Federal Register 57.45: 8194–8204.

Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (2001) The discourse of medical encounters. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. Hamilton (eds) Handbook of Discourse Analysis 453–469. Oxford: Blackwell Press.

Aldridge, M. and Barton, E. (2007) Establishing terminal status in the end-of-life discussion. Qualitative Health Research 17: 908–918.

Angus, D., Bonato, A., Linde-Zwirble, W. et al. (2004) Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Critical Care Medicine 32: 638–643.

Anspach, R. (1993) Deciding Who Lives: fateful choices in the intensive-care nursery. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Approaching Death: improving care at the end of life. (1997) Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.

Barton, E. (2006) Trajectories of alignment and the situated ethics of end-of-life discussions in American medicine. In F. Meyer and M. Giotti (eds) Advances in Medical Discourse: oral and written contexts 23–42. Bern: Peter Lang.

Barton, E., Aldridge, M., Trimble, T. and Vidovic, J. (2005) Structure and variation in end-of-life discussions in the surgical intensive care unit. Communication & Medicine 2: 1–21.

Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (2001) Principles of Bioethics (Fifth edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cassell, J. (2005) Life and Death in Intensive Care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Christakis, N. (1999) Death Foretold: prophecy and prognosis in medical care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Curtis, J. R. and Patrick, D. (2001) How to discuss dying and death in the ICU. In J. R. Curtis and G. Rubenfeld (eds) Managing Death in the ICU 85–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Curtis, J. R., Patrick, D., Shannon, S., Treece, P., Engelberg, R. and Rubenfeld, G. (2001) The family conference as a focus to improve communication about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: opportunities for improvement. Critical Care Medicine 29: N26–N33.

Curtis, J R., Engelberg, R., Wenrich, M., Nielsen, E., Shannon, S., Treece, P., Tonelli, M., Patrick, D., Robins, L., McGrath, B. and Rubenfeld, G. (2002) Studying communication about end-of-life care during the ICU family conference: Development of a framework. Journal of Critical Care 17: 147–160.

Curtis, J. R. and Rubenfeld, G. (eds) (2001) Managing Death in the ICU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1992) Talk at Work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Financial Implications of Promoting Excellence in End-of-life Care. (2002) Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1965) Awareness of Dying. Chicago: Aldine.

Iedema, R., Sorensen, R., Braithwaite, J. and Turnball, E. (2004) Speaking about dying in the intensive care unit, and its implications for multidisciplinary end-of-life care. Communication & Medicine 1: 85–96.

Johnstone, B. (2000) Qualitative Methods in Sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kagawa-Singer, M. and Blackhall, L. (2001) Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life. Journal of the American Medical Association 286: 2993–3001.

Kaufman, S. (2005) …And a Time to Die: how American hospitals shape the end of life. New York: Scribner.

Keenan, S., Busche, K., Chen, L., McCarthy, L., Inman, K. and Sibbold, W. (1997) A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support. Critical Care Medicine 22: 1020–1025.

Last Acts Coalition. (2002) Means to a Better End: a report on dying in America. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Levy, M. (2001) Making a personal relationship with death. In J. R. Curtis and G. Rubenfeld (eds) Managing Death in the ICU 31–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Morgan, J. (1978) Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9: speech acts 261–280. New York: Academic Press.

Mularski, R. and Osborne, M. (2001) The changing ethics of death in the ICU. In J. R. Curtis and G. Rubenfeld (eds) Managing Death in the ICU 7–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Murray, J. (2000) Intensive Care: a doctor’s journal. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Prendergast, T. and Luce, J. (1997) Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. American Journal of Respiration 155: 15–20.

Roberts, C. and Sarangi, S. (2005) Theme-oriented discourse analysis. Medical Education 30: 632–640.

Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (1999) The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work-related settings. In S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: discourse in medical, mediation and management settings 1–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. (eds) (2001) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Press.

Schneider, C. (1998) The Practice of Autonomy: patients, doctors, and medical decisions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schneiderman, L., Jecker, N. and Jonson, A. (1990) Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Annals of Internal Medicine 112: 949–954.

Schneiderman, L., Jecker, N. and Jonsen, A. (1996) Medical futility: response to critiques. Annals of Internal Medicine 125: 669–674.

Shannon, S. (2001) Helping families prepare for and cope with a death in the ICU. In J. R. Curtis and G. Rubenfeld (eds) Managing Death in the ICU 165–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Strauus, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (Second edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sudnow, D. (1967) Passing On. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

SUPPORT Principal Investigators. (1995) A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). Journal of the American Medical Association 274: 1591–1598.

Tannen, D. (1993) Framing in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tulsky, J., Fischer, G., Rose, M. and Arnold, R. (1998) Opening the black box: how do physicians communicate about advance directives? Annals of Internal Medicine 129: 441–449.

Zussman, R. (1992) Intensive Care: medical ethics and the medical profession. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Published

2008-04-11

How to Cite

Barton, E. (2008). Institutional Policies, Professional Practices, and the Discourse of End-of-Life Discussions in American Medicine. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 2(3), 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v2.i3.253

Issue

Section

Articles