Engaging with written corrective feedback
A longitudinal study comparing the effects of semi-focused feedback followed by self-revision and peer-discussion on gains in grammatical accuracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.26982Keywords:
written corrective feedback, revision, peer-discussion, problem-solution writing tasksAbstract
This paper extends a similar study by Kim and Emeliyanova (2021) by comparing the effects of self-revision (R) and peer-discussion (D) on linguistic accuracy following semi-focused direct written corrective feedback WCF. The study involved three groups of low-intermediate English as a second language (ESL) learners in a Sri Lankan university. The two experimental groups (R and D) received semi-focused WCF on ten problem-solution writing tasks. The R group (n = 30) revised each task and the D Group B (n = 31) discussed corrections for each task in pairs. A Control group (n = 31) just completed the tasks without WCF. Grammatical accuracy in all ten tasks was measured using obligatory occasion analysis. Both experimental groups (but not the Control group) improved in accuracy over the ten tasks. The R group was consistently more accurate than the D with medium effect sizes but the difference was not statistically significant. Overall, the findings echo those reported by Kim and Emeliyanova. The results are discussed in terms of the writers’ cognitive, behavioural and attitudinal engagement with WCF, drawing on findings from an exit questionnaire and interviews.
References
Bitchener, J. and Ferris, D. (2012) Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bitchener, J. and Storch, N. (2016) Written Corrective Feedback for L2 Development (Vol. 96). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Bonilla López, M., Van Steendam, E., Speelman, D. and Buyse, K. (2018) The differential effects of comprehensive feedback forms in the second language writing class. Language Learning 68(3): 813–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12295
Brown, D., Liu, Q. and Norouzian, R. (2023) Effectiveness of written corrective feedback in developing L2 accuracy: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13621688221147374
Chandler, J. (2003) The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(3): 267–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743 (03)00038-9
Cohen, A. D. and Cavalcanti, M. C. (1990) Feedback on written compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom 155–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009) A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal 63: 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Ellis, R. (2010) Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(2): 335–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544
Ellis, R. and Barkhuizen, G. P. (2005) Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ekanayaka, W. I. and Ellis, R. (2020) Does asking learners to revise add to the effect of written corrective feedback on L2 acquisition? System 94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102341
Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M. and Wolfersberger, M. (2010) Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research 14(4): 445–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375367
Ferris, D. and Roberts, B. (2001) Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10(3): 161–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743 (01)00039-X
Han, Y. (2017) Mediating and being mediated: Learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System 69: 133–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003
Han, Y. and Hyland, F. (2015) Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing 30: 31–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002
Hoey, M. (2001) Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
Kang, E. and Han, Z. (2015) The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal 99(1): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189
Karim, K. and Nassaji, H. (2019) The effects of written corrective feedback: a critical synthesis of past and present research. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/isla.37949
Kim, Y., Cho, H. and Ren, H. (2020) Collaborative writing tasks in an L3 classroom: Translanguaging, the quality of task outcomes and learners’ perceptions. In C. Lambart & R. Oliver (eds.), Using Tasks in Second Language Teaching: Practice in Diverse Contexts 225–280. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.21832/9781788929455-017
Kim, Y. and Emeliyanova, L. (2021) The effects of written corrective feedback on the accuracy of L2 writing: Comparing collaborative and individual revision behaviour. Language Teaching Research 25(2): 234–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168819831406
Lee, I. (2008) Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing 17(3): 144–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
Liu, Q. and Brown, D. (2015) Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 30: 66–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011
Mao, Z. and Lee, I. (2021) Researching L2 student engagement with written feedback: Insights from sociocultural theory. TESOL Quarterly 56(2): 788–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3071
Russell, J. and Spada, N. (2006) The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching 13: 133–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lllt.13.09val
Saragih, N. A., Madya, S., Siregar, R. A. and Saragih, W. (2021) Written corrective feedback: Students’ perception and preferences. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching 8(2): 676–90.
Sato, R. and Fujieda, Y. (2023) Critical review of studies of engagement with written corrective feedback for the improvement of written accuracy. Kyoai Gakuen University Repository 23: 65–86.
Semke, H. (1984) The effect of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals 17: 195–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x
Sheen, Y. (2011) Corrective Feedback, Individual Differences and Second Language Learning. New York: Springer.
Shintani, N., Ellis, R. and Suzuki, W. (2014) Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language Learning 64(1): 103–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12029
Storch, N. and Wigglesworth, G. (2010) Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 303–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532
Truscott, J. (1999) The case for ‘the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes’: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing 8(4): 111–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80124-6
Truscott, J. (2020) The efficacy of written corrective feedback: A critique of a meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H. and Kuiken, F. (2012) Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning 62(1): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x
Zheng, Y. and Yu, S. (2018) Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing 37: 13–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001
