Teaching oral skills in Higher Education (HE) language learning

Piloting a model for inclusive, accessible English Language Teaching (ELT)

Authors

  • Emanuela Tenca University of Verona
  • Sharon Hartle University of Verona
  • Sabrina Piccinin University of Verona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.26019

Keywords:

Universal Design for Learning (UDL), Higher Education (HE), language learning, Task-Based Language Learning (TBL), accessibility, inclusion, English Language Teaching (ELT)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test two UDL-informed models to inclusive, accessible language teaching in a Business English course at a B1+ level. We adopted a task-based learning (TBL) approach in the experimental group and a presentation, practice, production (PPP) approach in the control group. Our hypothesis was that the former approach would lead to a more significant performance gain in oral skills than the latter.

The hypothesis was tested by conducting oral pre- and post-tests prior to and following instruction, the scores of which were analysed quantitatively. These results were triangulated by a qualitative analysis of the answers learners gave to open questions on exit tickets throughout the course.

The quantitative findings showed significant performance gain in both groups after the treatment, but the difference between the two was not marked. However, the qualitative analysis revealed variation in the participants’ perceptions of their learning process, which may have been influenced by the approach applied. A future teaching model may, therefore, include both PPP and TBL elements, complemented by formative assessment strategies.

Author Biographies

  • Emanuela Tenca, University of Verona

    Emanuela Tenca received her PhD in Human Sciences at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (Italy). She has taught English as an adjunct professor in Padua, Parma, Modena and Reggio Emilia, and she has held a postdoctoral research position in English language and teaching at the University of Verona. Her research interests include English for specific purposes, corpus-based discourse analysis, English language teaching and learning, as well as inclusive and accessible education.

  • Sharon Hartle, University of Verona

    Sharon Hartle is an associate professor in the Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Verona. She specialises in English Language Teaching (ELT) pedagogy and didactics and works specifically in the field of English for Specific Purposes (ESP). She has worked for some years in the field of e-learning and specialises in multimedia material development for ELT in blended learning contexts, together with learning design for a range of contexts. Her research interests also extend to include English language assessment and English medium instruction (EMI).

  • Sabrina Piccinin, University of Verona

    Sabrina Piccinin holds a PhD in Linguistics and is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Verona. Her research interests include morphology, literacy development, second language acquisition, and second language teaching. In particular, she has been focusing on the morphological skills of non-native speakers of Italian and on the designing of specific teaching interventions for both adult and child learners of Italian. Recently, her research interests have expanded to the area of accessibility and inclusiveness in language teaching.

References

Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 109–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109

Alakrash, H. N. and Razak, N. A. (2021) Technology-based language learning: investigation of digital technology and digital literacy. Sustainability 13(21): 12304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112304

Benson, P. (2022) Autonomisation, individualisation and uses of space: Mapping out individual language learning environments. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/rdlc.10398

Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (2010) Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 92(1): 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119

Bozkurt, A. and Sharma, R. (2020) Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to coronavirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education 15(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083

Brookhart, S. M. (2013) Develop a student-centred mind-set for formative assessment. Voices from the Middle 21(2): 21–5. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/develop-student-centered-mind-set-formative/docview/1464751036/se-2

Bruner, J. S. (1961) The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review 31: 21–32.

Byrne, D. (1986). Teaching Oral English. Harlow: Longman.

Carless, D. (2009) Revisiting the TBLT versus the P-P-P debate: Voices from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 19: 49–66.

CAST (2018) Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org

Council of Europe (2020) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4

Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, P., Magni P.A. and Lam, S. (2020) COVID-19: 20 Countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching 3 (1): 9–28. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7

Daloiso, M. and Melero Rodríguez, C. A. (2017) Bisogni linguistici specifici e apprendimento della grammatica. Il potenziale glottodidattico della linguistica cognitiva. EL.LE 6(3): 363–84. http://doi.org/10.30687/ELLE/2280-6792/2017/03/004

Goldsmith, L. J. (2021) Using framework analysis in applied qualitative research. The Qualitative Report 46(6): 2061–76. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5011

Greco, G. M. (2019) Towards a pedagogy of accessibility: The need for critical learning spaces in media accessibility education and training. Linguistic Antverpiensia, New Series-Themes in Translation Studies 18: 23–46. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v18i0.518

Harmer, J. (1996) The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman.

Hartle (2022a) Lessons we can learn from emergency remote teaching. Modern English Teacher 31(1): 24–8. https://www.modernenglishteacher.com/lessons-we-can-learn-from-emergency-remote-teaching

Hartle (2022b) Materials for blended learning. In J. Norton and H. Buchanan (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Materials Development for Language Teaching 399–413. London and New York: Routledge.

Hildred Dave Eve, P. (2022) Teaching LSRW skills through the Test, Teach, Test (TTT) method. In S. Mechala and R. Geetha (eds) Contemporary ELT Strategies in Engineering Pedagogy 5–12. New York: Routledge.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. and Bond, A. (2020) The difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and online learning. EDUCase Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Holmqvist, M. and Lelinge, B. (2020) Teachers’ collaborative professional development for inclusive education, European Journal of Special Needs Education 36(5): 819-833. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1842974

Kormos, J. (2020) Specific learning difficulties in second language learning and teaching. Language Teaching 53(2): 129–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444819000442

Krippendorff, K. (2011). Computing Krippendorff’s Alpha-Reliability. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/43

Malahat, Y. (2016) The effect of task based language teaching on disabled learners’ first language written task accuracy, fluency, and complexity. International Journal of Educational Investigations 3(5): 52–60. doi:10.1017/S0261444819000442

Marzano, R. J. (2012) Becoming a Reflective Teacher. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Miller, S. (2022) Why design accessible learning content? eLaHub. https://www.elahub.net/why-design-accessible-learning-content/

Moriña, A. (2017) Inclusive education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Special Needs Education 32(1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254964

Nash, C. (2020) Report on digital literacy in academic meetings during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown. Challenges 11(2): 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe11020020

Norton, B. (2013) Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Palinscar, A. S. (1998) Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology 49: 345–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345

Pomarolli, G. (2021) Teaching Russian (FL) to visually impaired students during COVID: Technological tools, teaching strategies, and digital materials. Russian Language Journal 71(2): 171–93. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rlj/vol71/iss2/9

Pomarolli, G. (2022) Some practical insights on teaching FL to visually impaired students. 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’22), 671–8. Valencia: Universitat Politecnica de Valencia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/HEAd22.2022.14588

Powell, K. C. and Kalina, C. J. (2009) Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom, Education 130(2): 241–50. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A216181184/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=3f64b9a8

Prabhu, N. S. (1987) Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L. (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman and B. Burgess (eds) Analysing Qualitative Data 173–94. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413081

Robledo, T. and González, L. (2017) Teaching English to students with special needs: A case of study in a high school of Ávila (Spain). Verbeia 3(2) 88–115.

Sadler, D. R. (1998) Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5(1): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050104

Savidis, A., Grammenos, D. and Stephanidis, C. (2007) Developing inclusive e-learning and e-entertainment to effectively accommodate learning difficulties. Universal Access in the Information Society 5(4): 401–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0024-1

Schleicher, A. (2020) Curriculum (Re)design: A Series of Thematic Reports from the OECD Education 2030 Project. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/brochure-thematic-reports-on-curriculum-redesign.pdf

Scrivener, J. (1994) PPP and after. The Teacher Trainer 8(1): 15–16.

Seale, J. K. (2013) E-Learning and Disability in Higher Education: Accessibility Research and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.

Skehan, P. (1996) A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics 7(1): 38–62.

Thomas, N., Lucski, G. and McCulloch, E. (2021) Resilience in the face of emergency remote teaching: EAL pupils’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. TESOL Journal 12(2): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.591

UCLES (2008) Business English Certificates. Handbook for Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

UNICEF (2017) Inclusive Education. Including Children with Disabilities in Quality Learning: What Needs to be Done? New York: UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/eca/sites/unicef.org.eca/files/IE_summary_accessible_220917_brief.pdf

United Nations (2022) The Sustainable Development Goals Report. New York: United Nations Publications. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf

Ur, P. (2018) PPP: Presentation–Practice–Production. In J. I. Liontas (ed.) The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching 1–6. Hoboken: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0092

Van Lier, L. (2004) The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Van Lier, L. (2008) Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (eds) Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages 163–86. London: Equinox.

Wilkins, D. A. (1974). A communicative approach to syllabus construction in adult language learning. Modern Languages in Adult Education, EESI Symposium 57(10). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Willis, D. and Willis, J. R. (1996) Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. Oxford: Macmillan.

Willis, J. R. (1996) A Framework for Task-based Learning. London: Longman.

Willis, J. R. (2004) Perspectives on task-based instruction: Understanding our practices acknowledging different practitioners. In B. L. Leaver and J. R. Willis (eds) Task-Based Instruction in Foreign Language Education: Practices and Programs 3–46. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Yaiche, W. (2021) Boosting EFL learners’ critical thinking through guided discovery: A classroom-oriented research on first-year master students. Arab World English Journal 12(1): 71–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3826506

Published

2023-11-15

How to Cite

Tenca, E., Hartle, S., & Piccinin, S. (2023). Teaching oral skills in Higher Education (HE) language learning: Piloting a model for inclusive, accessible English Language Teaching (ELT). Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 130-165. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.26019