Rethinking textbook grammar introduction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.21186Keywords:
processability theory, teachability hyporhesis, L2 Swedish, grammar textbook, learnabilityAbstract
This article describes the construction of a Swedish grammar textbook based on learnability and teachability within the processability theory (PT) paradigm. The article discusses the difficulties and choices encountered when applying the morphologic and syntactic structures defined for second-language Swedish in a learnable order. The main concerns raised in the literature, such as the limited
number of structures studied within PT and the heterogeneity in the classroom, are also discussed. The textbook emphasises the distinction between processing and automatising (correct use), as it entails different types of exercises. It is argued in the article that explicit instruction on forms that are already processed may be the wrong priority. It is also argued that even though the idea of acquisitional stages is not accepted by everyone, developmental readiness does not interfere with other factors, such as frequency of input, due to the distinction between learning objectives and general input.
References
Baten, K. and Keßler, J-U. (2019) Research timeline. The role of instruction: Teachability and processability. In R. Arntzen, G. Håkansson, A. Hjelde and J-U. Keßler (eds.), Teachability and Learnability Across Languages 9–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bonilla, C. (2015) Instructing stages of Processability Theory in L2 Spanish: Next or Next + 1? In: K. Baten, A. Buyl, K. Lochtman, M. Herreweghe (eds.) Theory Development in Processability Theory 205–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cadierno and Eskildsen (2015) Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Language, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, J. (2017) Flerspråkiga elever – Effektiv Undervisning i en Utmanande Tid? [Multilingual pupils – efficient teaching in a challenging time?] Stockholm: Natur and Kultur.
de Bot, K., Lowie, W. and Verspoor, M. (2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(1): 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728906002732
Di Biase, B. (2002) Focusing strategies in second language development: A classroom-based study of Italian L2 in primary school. In B. Di Biase (ed.) Developing a Second Language: Acquisition, Processing and Pedagogy Issues in Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, and Swedish 95–120. Melbourne: Language Australia.
Di Biase, B. (2008) Focus-on-form and development in L2 learning. In J.-U. Keßler (ed.), Processability Approaches to Second Language Development and Second Language Learning 197–219. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar.
Doughty, C. (1991) Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an ampirical study of ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13(4): 431–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100010287
Dyson, B. (1996) The debate on form-focused instruction: A teacher’s perspective. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 19: 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19.2.04dys
Dyson, B. and Håkansson, G. (2017) Understanding Second Language Processing. A focus on Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eklund-Heinonen, M. (2009) Processbarhet på prov: bedömning av muntlig språkfärdighet hos vuxna andraspråksinlärare. [Processability in tests: Assessment of oral proficiency in adult second language learners.] PhD thesis, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Ellis, R. (1989) Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of the German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 303–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100008159
Ellis, N. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006) Language emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics (Introduction to the Special Issue). Applied Linguistics 27(4): 558–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml028
Flyman Mattsson, A. (2016) Att lära ut vad inlärare kan lära in: om grammatisk utveckling hos andraspråksinlärare. [To teach what learners can learn: second language learners’ grammatical development.] In B. Kindenberg (ed.), Flerspråkighet som Resurs [Multilingualism as a resource] 67–79. Nationellt centrum för svenska som andraspråk, Symposium 15.
Flyman Mattsson, A. (2019) Morphosyntactic development in the input: a study of second language learning textbooks. In R. Arntzen, G. Håkansson, A. Hjelde and J-U. Keßler (eds.), Teachability and Learnability Across Languages 51–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Flyman Mattsson, A. and Håkansson, G. (2021) Bedömning av Svenska som Andraspråk. En Analysmodell Baserad på Grammatiska Utvecklingsstadier. [Assessment of Swedish as a second language. An analysis model based on grammatical developmental stages.] Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Giota, J. (2013) Individualiserad Undervisning i Skolan – en Forskningsöversikt. [Individualized teaching in school - a research overview.] Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 3:2013.
Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A. and Lund, K. (2001) Processability in Scandinavian second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(3): 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263101003047
Goldschneider, J.M. and DeKeyser, R.M. (2001) Explaining the “Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition” in English: A Meta-analysis of Multiple Determinants. Language Learning 51(1): 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147
Hardini, I., Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S. and Reid, C. (2020) The effect of developmentally moderated focus on form instruction in Indonesian kindergarten children learning English as a foreign language. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 4(1): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.39724
Håkansson, G. (1987) Teacher talk. How teachers modify their speech when addressing learners of Swedish as a second language. PhD thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
Håkansson, G. (2000) Svenska som förstaspråk eller som andraspråk. Likheter och skillnader. [Swedish as a first language or a second language. Similarities and differences.] In: H. Åhl (ed.), Svenskan i Tiden – Verklighet och Visioner. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
Kawaguchi, S. (2005) Processability Theory and Japanese as a second language. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language 8: 83–114.
Keßler, J.-U. (2007) Assessing EFL-Development online: a feasibility study of Rapid Profile. In: F. Mansouri (ed.), Second Language Acquisition Research. Theory Construction and Testing 119–44. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Keßler, J.-U. and Keatinge, D. (2008) Profiling oral second language development. In J.-U. Keßler (ed.), Processability Approaches to Second Language Development and Second Language Learning 165–97. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.
Keßler, J.-U. and Liebner, M. (2011) Diagnosing L2 development: Rapid Profile. In M. Pienemann and J-U. Keßler (eds.), Studying Processability Theory 133–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keßler, J-U. and Pienemann, M. (2011) Research methodology: How do we know about developmental schedules? In M. Pienemann and J-U. Keßler (eds.), Studying Processability Theory 84–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lenzing, A. (2008) Teachability and learnability: An analysis of primary school textbooks. In J.-U. Keßler (ed.), Processability Approaches to Second Language Development and Second Language Learning 221–45. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.
Lightbown, P.M. (1985) Can language acquisition be altered by instruction? In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (eds.), Modeling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition 101–12. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Lightbown, P. (1998) The importance of timing in Focus on Form. In C. Doughty and J Williams (eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition 177–96. Cambridge: CUP.
Long, M. (1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In: K. de Bot, R.B. Ginsberg and C. Kramsch (eds.), Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective 39–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mansouri, F. and Duffy, L. (2005) The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 28(1): 81–99.
Nassaji, H. (2016) Research timeline: Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. Language Teaching 49: 35–62.
Norrby, C. and Håkansson, G. (2007) The Interaction of complexity and grammatical processability – the case of Swedish as a foreign language. IRAL 45(1): 45–68.
Philipsson, A. (2007) Interrogative clauses and verb morphology in L2 Swedish. theoretical interpretations of grammatical development and effects of different elicitation techniques. PhD thesis, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Pienemann, M. (1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6: 186–214.
Pienemann, M. (1985) Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (eds.), Modeling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition 23–76. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Pienemann, M. (1987) Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 10: 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.10.2.07pie
Pienemann, M. (1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10(1): 217–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.52
Pienemann, M. (1998) Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M. (2011) L1 transfer. In M. Pienemann and J-U. Keßler (eds.), Studying Processability Theory 75–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Pienemann, M. and Håkansson, G. (1999) A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: a processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(3): 383–420. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263199003022
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. and Brindley, G. (1988) Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10: 217–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100007324
Schönström, K. (2010) Tvåspråkighet hos döva skolelever. Processbarhet i svenska och narrativ struktur i svenska och svenskt teckenspråk. [Bilingualism in school-aged deaf pupils: Processability in Swedish and narrative structure in Swedish and Swedish sign Language.] PhD thesis, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Schönström, K. (2014) Visual acquisition of Swedish in deaf children. An L2 processability approach. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(1): 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.1.03sch
Spada, N. and Lightbown, P. (1999) Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in Second Language Acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 83: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00002
Spinner, P. (2011) Second language assessment and morphosyntactic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 529–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263111000301
Tang, X. (2017) Learnability and pedagogical implication: an acquisition-based evaluation of English textbooks in China. Dissertation, Australian National University, Australia.
Wang, X. (2011) Grammatical development among Chinese L2 learners: from a processability account. Dissertation, Newcastle University, United Kingdom.
Zhang, Y. (2001) Second language acquisition of Chinese grammatical morphemes: a processability perspective. Dissertation, Australian National University, Australia.
Zhang, Y. (2005) Processing and formal instruction in the L2 acquisition of five Chinese grammatical morphemes. In M. Pienemann (ed.), Cross-Linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory 155–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zhang, X. and Lantolf, J.P. (2015) Natural or artificial? Is the route of L2 development teachable? Language Learning 65: 152–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12094
Zipser, K. (2012) Processability theory and pedagogical progression in an Italian textbook. Linguistica 52(1): 55–68.
Vinterek, M. (2006) Individualisering i ett Skolsammanhang. [Individualization in a school context.] Myndigheten för skolutveckling. Stockholm: Liber.
