The effect of field independence on processing instruction on the acquisition of English passive by Iranian EFL learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.20078Keywords:
form-focused instruction, processing instruction, input processing theory, processing strategy, field independence, Group Embedded Figures TestAbstract
This work reports on a classroom-based study that investigated the role of field independence in the effectiveness of processing instruction. From a high school in Iran, fifty six learners were recruited and randomly assigned to an experimental and a comparison group. The former was taught through processing instruction while the latter received traditional output-based instruction on English passive. A sentence-level interpretation task was used in a pretest-treatment-posttest design to measure instructional effects. The results illustrated that processing instruction significantly improved learners’ acquisition of the target structure, whereas the traditional instruction was not effective. Furthermore, no interaction was found between the learners’ field independence and their performance in the immediate and delayed posttests. This could be attributed to the unique characteristic of processing instruction and its systematic nature neutralising learners’ differences and consequently creating an optimum learning condition benefitting all the learners.
References
Abraham, R. (1983) Relationship between use of the strategy of monitoring and cognitive style. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6: 17–32.
Abraham, R. (1985) Field independence-dependence and the teaching of grammar. TESOL Quarterly 20: 689–702.
Abraham, R. and Chapelle, C. A. (1992) The meaning of cloze test scores: An item difficulty perspective. Modern Language Journal 76: 468–79.
Alptekin, C. and Atakan, S. (1990) Field dependence-independence and hemisphericity as variables in L2 achievement. Second Language Research 6: 135–49.
Angelovska, T. and Benati, A. (2013) Processing instruction and the age factor: Can adults and school-age native speakers of German process English simple past tense correctly? In J. F. Lee and A. Benati (eds) Individual Differences and Processing Instruction 131–53. London: Equinox.
Batziou, M. (2017) Measuring short and long-term effects of isolated and combined structured input and structured output on the acquisition of the English causative form at sentence and discourse level. Unpublished PhD doctoral dissertation, University of Portsmouth, UK.
Benati, A. (2001) A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research 5(2): 95–127. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F136216880100500202
Benati, A. (2004) The effects of processing instruction and its components on the acquisition of gender agreement in Italian. Language Awareness 13: 67–80.
Benati, A. (2005) The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction and meaning output instruction in the acquisition of English simple past tense. Language Teaching Research 9(1): 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1191%2F1362168805lr154oa
Benati, A. (2013) Age and the effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of English passive constructions among school children and adult native speakers of Turkish. In J. F. Lee and A. Benati (eds) Individual Differences and Processing Instruction 83–104. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
Benati, A. (2015) The effects of re-exposure to instruction and the use of discourse-level interpretation tasks on processing instruction and the Japanese passive. International Review of Applied Linguistics 53: 127–50.
Benati, A. (2019) Classroom-oriented research: Processing instruction (findings and implications). Language Teaching 52(3): 343–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000386
Benati, A. (2020) The effects of structured input and traditional instruction on the acquisition of the English causative passive forms: An eye-tracking study measuring accuracy in responses and processing patterns. Language Teaching Research. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820928577
Benati, A. and Angelovska, T. (2015) The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of English simple past tense: Age and cognitive task demands. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 53(2): 249–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral2015-0012
Benati, A. and Lee, J. F. (2008) Grammar Acquisition and Processing Instruction: Secondary and Cumulative Effects. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Benati, A. G. and Lee, J. F. (2010) Exploring the effects of processing instruction on discourse level interpretation tasks with the Japanese passive construction. In A. G. Benati and J.F. Lee (eds) Processing Instruction and Discourse 178–97. London: Continuum.
Benati, A., Lee, J. F. and McNulty, E. M. (2010) Exploring the effects of processing instruction on a discourse-level guided composition with the Spanish subjunctive after the adverb cuando. In A. G. Benati and J. F. Lee (eds) Processing Instruction and Discourse 97–147. London: Continuum.
Birjandi, P and Rahemi, J. (2009) The effect of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the interpretation and production of English causatives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12: 1–30.
Brown, H. D. (2000) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th edn). New York: Pearson Education.
Cattell, R. B. (1987) Intelligence: Its Structure, Growth and Action. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Chapelle, C. and Green, P. (1992) Field independence/dependence in second-language acquisition. Language Learning 42(1): 47–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14671770.1992.tb00700.x
Chapelle, C. and Roberts, C. (1986) Ambiguity tolerance and field independence as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language. Language Learning 36: 27–45.
Chiuchiù, G. and Benati, A. (2020) A self-paced-reading study on the effects of structured input and textual enhancement on the acquisition of the Italian subjunctive of doubt. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 4(2): 235–57. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.40659
Clark, V. L. P. and Creswell, J. W. (2015) Understanding Research: A Consumer’s Guide. New York: Pearson.
Cox, J. and Sanz, C. (2015) Deconstructing PI for the ages: Explicit instruction vs. practice in young and older adult bilinguals. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 53(2): 225–48.
Dave, A. (2004) Oxford Placement Test 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dehghani, A. P., Bagheri, M. S., Sadighi, F. and Tayyebi, G. (2016) Investigating difficulty order of certain English grammar features in an Iranian EFL setting. International Journal of English Linguistics 6(6): 209–20. DOI:10.5539/ijel.v6n6p209
DeKeyser, M. (2012) Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning 62(Suppl.2): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.x
Dörnyei, Z. and Ryan, S. (2015) The Psychology of Language Learner Revisited. New York: Routledge.
Elliott, A. (1995) Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal 79: 356–71.
Ellis, R. (1989) Classroom learning styles and their effect on second language acquisition: A study of two learners. System 17(2): 249–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(89)90037-7
Ellis, R. (2001) Introduction: investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning 51 (Supplement 1): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x
Ellis, R. (2003) Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erlam, R. (2005) Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research 9(2): 147–71. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr161oa
Farhat, A. and Benati, A. (2018) The effects of motivation on processing instruction in the acquisition of modern standard Arabic gender agreement. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 2(1): 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.34879
Glimois, L. (2019) The effects of input flood, structured input, explicit information, and language background on beginner learners’ acquisition of a target structure in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished PhD doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Guo, X. and Yang, Y. (2018) Effects of corrective feedback on EFL learners’ acquisition of third-person singular form and the mediating role of cognitive style. Journal of Psycholinguist Research 47: 841–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9566-7
Ito, K. and Wong, W. (2019) Processing instruction and the effects of input modality and voice familiarity on the acquisition of the French causative construction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(2): 443–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000281
Jamieson, J. (1992) The cognitive styles of reflection/impulsivity and field independence/dependence and ESL success. The Modern Language Journal 76(4): 491–501. https://doi.org/10.2307/330050
Johnson, J., Prior, S. and Artuso, M. (2000) Field dependence as a factor in second language communicative production. Language Learning 50(3): 529–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00137
Kasprowicz, R. and Marsden, E. (2018) Towards ecological validity in research into input-based practice: Form spotting can be as beneficial as form-meaning practice. Applied Linguistics 39(6): 886–911. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw051
Lee, J. F. (2013) Individual differences and processing instruction. In J. F. Lee and A. Benati (eds) Individual Differences and Processing Instruction 211–28. London: Equinox.
Lee, J. F. and Benati, A. G. (2007) The effects of structured input activities on the acquisition of two Japanese linguistic features. In J. F. Lee and A. G. Benati (eds) Delivering Processing Instruction in Classrooms and Virtual Contexts: Research and Practice 49–72. London: Equinox.
Lee, J. F. and McNulty, E. M. (2013) The effects of language background on the results of processing instruction on the Spanish subjunctive/indicative contrast after the adverb cuando. In J. F. Lee and A. Benati (eds) Individual Differences in Processing Instruction 49–81.
Lima, M. S., Barcellos, P. S. C. C. and Spada, N. (2016) Paths in Applied Linguistics: A conversation with Nina Spada. Calidoscópio 14 (1): 176–79. doi:10.4013/cld.2016.141.17
Loschky, L. and Bley-Vroman, R. (1993) Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes and S. Gass (eds) Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice 123–67. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Mahvelati, E. H. (2020) Field-dependent/field-independent learners’ information processing behavior in an implicit learning task: Evidence from Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 49(6): 955–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-02009712-9
Marefat, F. and Nushi, M. (2012) Combating fossilization through feedback: Does it work? Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) 15(1): 43–71. http://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-78-en.html
Mavrontoni, M. and Benati, A. (2013) The effects of processing instruction and traditional instruction on two different school-age learners: The case of English present simple tense, third person singular. In J. F. Lee and A. Benati (eds) Individual Differences and Processing Instruction 185–210. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
Naami, A. and Sahragard, R. (2020) Processing instruction revisited in the Iranian EFL context and the moderating role of grammatical sensitivity. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies 12(2): 115–60. doi: 10.22111/ijals.2020.6044
Nassaji, H. (2000) Towards integrating form-focused instruction and communicative interaction in the second language classrooms: Some pedagogical possibilities. The Modern Language Journal 84(2): 241–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00065
Nassaji, H. and Fotos, S. (2011) Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative Context. New York: Routledge.
Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L. (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50 (3): 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
Pallant, J. (2013) SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. New York: Open University Press.
Rahemi, J. (2018) The effect of isolated vs. combined processing instruction and output-based instruction on the learning of English passives. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) 21: 163–94.
Rahimi, M. (2015) The role of individual differences in L2 learners’ retention of written corrective feedback. Journal of Response to Writing 1(1): 19–48. Retrieved from https://journalrw.org/index.php/jrw/article/view/18
Rassaei, E. (2015) Recasts, field dependence/independence cognitive style, and L2 development. Language Teaching Research 19 (4): 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541713
Sanz, C. and Morgan-Short, K. (2004) Positive evidence vs. explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning 54 (1): 35–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00248.x
Spada, N. (2011) Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching 44(2): 225–36.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000224
Tinajero, C. and Páramo, M. F. (1998a) Field dependence-independence cognitive style and academic achievement: A review of research and theory. European Journal of Psychology of Education 13(2): 227–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173091.
Tinajero, C. and Páramo, M. F. (1998b) Field dependence-independence in second language acquisition: Some forgotten aspects. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 1(1): 32–8.
Uludag, O. and VanPatten, B. (2012) The comparative effects of processing instruction and dictogloss on the acquisition of the English passive by speakers of Turkish. International Review of Applied Linguistics 50: 189–212.
VanPatten, B. (1996) Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
VanPatten, B. (2002) Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4): 755–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00203
VanPatten, B. (2004) Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (ed) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary 5–31. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
VanPatten, B. (2015a) Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition (2nd edn) 113–35. New York: Routledge.
VanPatten, B. (2015b) Foundations of processing instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 53(2): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0005
VanPatten, B. and Borst, S. (2012) The roles of explicit information and grammatical sensitivity in processing instruction: Nominative-accusative case marking and word order in German L2. Foreign Language Annals 45(1): 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01169.x
VanPatten, B. and Cadierno, T. (1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(2): 225–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011979
VanPatten, B., Collopy, E., Price, J., Borst, S. and Qualin, A. (2013) Explicit information, grammatical sensitivity, and the First-Noun Principle: A cross-linguistic study in processing instruction. The Modern Language Journal 97(2): 504–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12007.x
VanPatten, B. and Fernández, C. (2004) The long-term effects of processing instruction. In B.VanPatten (ed) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research and Commentary 277–94. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
VanPatten, B. and Oikennon, S. (1996) Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18(4): 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015394
VanPatten, B. and Wong, W. (2004) Processing instruction and the French causative: Another replication. In B. VanPatten (ed) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research and Commentary 99–121. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Vatz, K., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R. and Doughty, C. (2013) Aptitude-treatment interaction in second language acquisition: Findings and methodology. In G. Granena and M. H. Long (eds) Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude and Ultimate L2 Attainment 273–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Witkin, H. and Goodenough, D. (1981) Cognitive Styles: Essence and Origins. New York: International Universities Press.
Witkin, H., Oltman, P., Raskin E. and Karp, S. (1971) A Manual for the Group Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Wong, W. (2004) The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (ed) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research and Commentary 187–205. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wong, W. (2010) Exploring the effects of discourse-level structured input activities with French causative. In A. G. Benati and J. F. Lee (eds) Processing Instruction and Discourse 198–216. New York: Continuum.
Wong, W., Ito, K., and Glimois, L. (2021) PI and the French causative and passive constructions: Examining transfer-of-training effects using eye tracking. In M. J. Leeser, G. D. Keating and W. Wong (eds) Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction: Studies in Honor of Bill VanPatten 261–94.
