The impact of models and reformulations on EFL primary school children’s noticing and written output

Authors

  • Ruth Milla Melero University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
  • María del Pilar García Mayo University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.19670

Keywords:

models, reformulations, written corrective feedback, children, collaborative writing, noticing

Abstract

The present study aims to contribute to the literature about written corrective feedback (WCF) by addressing two under-researched aspects: on the one hand, making a comparison of models and reformulation as to their effect in noticing and incorporation of linguistic features in learners’ revised drafts; on the other hand, exploring the use of these WCF types by a group of 28 primary school learners (11–12 years old) engaged in collaborative writing. Language related episodes occurring during collaborative work and learners’ written output were examined at three different times: (i) before being given any feedback; (ii) immediately after being provided with models or reformulations; and (iii) a month later. Results show few significant differences but clear trends as to the different effect of models and reformulations on learners’ subsequent drafts.

Author Biographies

  • Ruth Milla Melero, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)

    Dr. Ruth Milla is an assistant professor at the Faculty of Education of the University of the Basque Country. Her research and publications deal with EFL teaching and learning in multilingual contexts.

  • María del Pilar García Mayo, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)

    María del Pilar García Mayo is Full Professor of English Language and Linguistics at the University of the Basque Country. She has published widely on the L2/L3 acquisition of English morphosyntax and the study of conversational interaction in EFL. She is the editor of Language Teaching Research, the director of the research group Language and Speech and of the MA program Language Acquisition in Multilingual Settings.

References

Adams, R. (2003) L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development. Language Teaching Research 7: 347–76. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168803LR127OA

Allwright, R.L., Woodley, M.P., and Allwright, J.M. (1988) Investigating reformulation as a practical strategy for the teaching of academic writing. Applied Linguistics 9: 236–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.3.236

Alshuraida, A. and Storch, N. (2019) Investigating a collaborative approach to peer feedback. ELT Journal 73(2): 166–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy057

Alwaleedi, M.A., Gillies, R.M. and Hamid, M.O. (2019) Collaborative writing in Arabic as a second language (ASL) classrooms: A mixed-method study. Language, Culture and Curriculum 32(2): 157–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1521422

Calzada, A. and García Mayo, M.P. (2020) Child EFL grammar learning through a collaborative writing task. In W. Suzuki and N. Storch (eds) Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching 19–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.01cal

Cambridge English, (n.d.) Cambridge English: Flyers (YLE Flyers). Cambridge: Cambridge English Language Assessment. Accessed in January 2021. Available at: http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams/young-learners-english/flyers

Cambridge English (2014) Young Learners. Young Learners English Tests (YLE). Sample Papers. Flyers. Volume 1: 36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cánovas Guirao, J. (2011) The use of models as a written feedback tool in primary education. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). University of Murcia, Spain.

Cánovas Guirao, J., Roca de Larios, J. and Coyle, Y. (2015) The use of models as a written feedback technique with young EFL learners. System 52: 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.002

Chandler, J. (2003) The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 267–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9

Chen, W. and Yu, S. (2019) A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System 82: 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005

Coyle, Y. and Cánovas Guirao, J. (2019) Learning to write in a second language: the role of guided interaction in promoting children’s noticing from model texts. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education 2(1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.22

Coyle, Y. and Roca de Larios, J. (2014) Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in an L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(3): 451–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000612

Coyle, Y. and Roca de Larios, J. (2020) Exploring young learners’ engagement with models as a written corrective technique in EFL and CLIL settings. System 95: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102374

Coyle, Y., Cánovas Guirao, J, and Roca de Larios, J. (2018) Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing 42: 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002

Coyle, Y., Férez Mora, P.A. and Solís Becerra, J. (2020) Improving reference cohesion in young EFL learners’ collaboratively written narratives: Is there a role for reformulation? System 94: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102333

Donato, R. (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (eds) Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-1-5-3

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., and Takashima, H. (2008) The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36: 353–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001

Fernández Dobao, A. (2014) Attention to form in collaborative writing tasks: Comparing pair and small group interaction. The Canadian Modern Language Review 70(2): 158–87. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1768

Ferris, D. R. (2003) Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ferris, D. (2010) Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490

Fukuta, J., Tamura, Y., and Kawaguchi, Y. (2019) Written languaging with indirect feedback in writing revision: Is feedback always effective? Language Awareness 28(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1567742

García, F. J. (2011) Written corrective feedback: Testing the effects of reformulation with Year 5 primary school learners. Unpublished Master’s thesis. University of Murcia, Spain.

García Mayo, M.P. (2018) Child task-based interaction in EFL settings: Research and challenges. International Journal of English Studies 18: 119–43. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/2/319731

García Mayo, M. P. and Azkarai, A. (2016) EFL task-based interaction: Does task modality impact on language-related episodes? In M. Sato and S. Ballinger (eds) Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Research Agenda and Pedagogical Potential 241–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi 10.1075/lllt.45.10gar

García Mayo, M. P. and Imaz Agirre, A. (2019) Task modality and pair formation method: their impact on patterns of interaction and attention to form among EFL primary school children. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics 80: 165–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.011

García Mayo, M. P. and Loidi Labandibar, U. (2017) The use of models as written corrective feedback in EFL writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 37: 110–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190517000071

Hanaoka, O. (2006). Noticing from models and reformulations: A case study of two Japanese EFL learners. Sophia Linguistica: Working Papers in Linguistics 54: 167–92.

Hanaoka, O. (2007) Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research 11: 459–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807080963

Hanaoka, O. and Izumi, S. (2012) Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 21(4): 332–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.008.

Harris, K.R. and Graham, S. (2009) Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future. British Journal of Educational Psychology 6: 113–35.

Kang, E. (2020) Using model texts as a form of feedback in L2 writing. System 89: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102196

Karim, K. and Nassaji, H. (2019) The effects of written corrective feedback: a critical synthesis of past and present research. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3(1): 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.37949

Kellogg, R. T. (1988) Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14(2): 355–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.2.355

Kim, H. R. and Bowles, M. (2019) How deeply do second language learners process written corrective feedback? Insights gained from think-alouds. TESOL Quarterly 94(4): 913–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522

Kim, Y. and McDonough, K. (2008) The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research 12(2): 211–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086288

Kormos, J. (2012) The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 21: 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003

Lázaro Ibarrola, A. (2009) Reformulation and self-correction: testing the validity of correction strategies in the classroom. RESLA 22: 189–215.

Lázaro Ibarrola, A. (2013) Reformulation and self-correction: Insights into correction strategies for EFL writing in a school context. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics (VIAL) 10: 29–49.

Leeser, M. J. (2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research 8(1): 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr134oa

Luquin, M. and García Mayo, M.P. (2021) Exploring the use of models as a written corrective feedback technique among EFL. System 98: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102465

Manchón, R. M. (2011) Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (ed.) Learning to write and writing to learn in an additional language 61–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.07man

Martínez, F. and Roca de Larios, J. (2010) The use of models as a form of written feedback to secondary school pupils of English. International Journal of English Studies 2: 143–70. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119241

Nassaji, H. and Kartchava, E. (2017) Corrective Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning: Research, Theory, Applications, Implications. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621432

Qi, D.S. and Lapkin, S. (2001) Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7

Sachs, R. and Polio, C. (2007) Learners’ uses of two type of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29(1): 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070039

Santos, M., López Serrano, S. and Manchón, R. (2010) The differential effects of two types of direct written corrective feedback on noticing and uptake: Reformulation vs. error correction. International Journal of English Studies 10: 131–54. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/1/114011

Schmidt, R. (2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (ed.) Cognition and Second Language Instruction 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780

Storch, N. (2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 52: 119–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179

Storch, N. (2008) Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness 17(2): 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802146644

Storch, N. (2013) Collaborative Writing in L2 Classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Storch, N. and Wigglesworth, G. (2007) Writing tasks: The effect of collaboration. In M.P. García Mayo (ed.) Investigating Tasks in Foreign Language Learning 157–77. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Storch, N. and Wigglesworth, G. (2010) Learners’ processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 303–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532

Swain, M. (2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (ed.) Advanced Language Learning. The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky 95–108). London: Continuum. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-4-6

Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to formulation. International Journal of Educational Research 37: 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5

Thwaites, P. (2014) Maximizing learning from written output. ELT Journal 68(2): 135–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct098

Tocalli-Beller, A. and Swain. M. (2005) Reformulation: The cognitive conflict and L2 learning it generates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15: 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00078.x

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Watanabe, Y. (2008) Peer–peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. Canadian Modern Language Review 64(4): 605–35. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605

Wigglesworth, G. and Storch, N. (2009) Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing 26(3): 445–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670

Wigglesworth, G. and Storch, N. (2012) Feedback and writing development through collaboration: A socio-cultural approach. In R. M. Manchón (ed.) L2 Writing Development: Multiple Perspectives 69–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Williams, J. (2012) The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing 21: 321–31.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S. and Ross, G. (1976) The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17(2): 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Yang, L. and Zhang, L. (2010) Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance. Language Teaching Research 14: 464–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375369

Published

2022-03-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Melero, R. M. ., & García Mayo, M. del P. (2022). The impact of models and reformulations on EFL primary school children’s noticing and written output. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 6(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.19670

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>