Prior knowledge and other individual differences in the development of accuracy over the time-course of a pre-test/treatment/post-test study of instructed second language acquisition

Authors

  • James F. Lee Texas Tech University
  • Stephen Doherty University of New South Wales, Sydney

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.40608

Keywords:

Processing instruction, developmental accuracy, individual differences, prior knowledge, passive sentences

Abstract

Time-course data are temporal data that can be explored statically as an outcome measure of accuracy or dynamically from evolutionary and developmental perspectives. The present study examines the development and evolution of accuracy throughout the time-course of a pre-test/treatment/post-test study of instructed second language acquisition. The treatment is processing instruction (PI), which has a long history of positive results. PI research has overwhelmingly compared pre-test with post-test accuracy scores. The present study provides a fine-grained analysis as accuracy evolved and developed sentence by sentence. We analyse two sentence types: baseline active sentences and the target of instruction, passive sentences. Participants were divided into two groups, higher/lower prior knowledge, based on their pre-test scores processing passive sentences. Typically, PI research excludes higher prior knowledge participants, but here they are a comparison group. Our base measurement of development is an accuracy trend, defined as at least three correct answers in a row. We found that the number and length of accuracy trends increased over the time-course of the study and are affected by both sentence type and prior knowledge. The higher prior knowledge group always seems to have the advantage. Both prior knowledge groups benefit from instruction, but in different ways. We also found individual differences within the lower prior knowledge group: some participants benefited a great deal from instruction, some very little, and for some their accuracy with the baseline active sentences was temporarily destabilised.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

James F. Lee, Texas Tech University

Qualia Professor of Applied Linguistics

Classical and Modern Languages and Literatures

Stephen Doherty, University of New South Wales, Sydney

School of Humanities and Languages

Associate Professor

References

Anderson, R. C. and Pichert, J. W. (1978) Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90485-1

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2015) One functional approach to SLA: the concept-oriented approach. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (2nd edn) 54–74. New York: Routledge.

Benati, A. G. (2004) The effects of structured input and explicit information on the acquisition of Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary 207–55. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Benati, A. G., Lee, J. F. and McNulty, E. M. (2010) Exploring the effects of processing instruction on a discourse-level guided composition with the Spanish subjunctive after the adverb cuando. In A. G. Benati and J. F. Lee (eds) Processing Instruction and Discourse 97–147. London: Continuum.

Bergsleithner, J. M. (2019) The role of prior knowledge in depth of processing during written production: a preliminary investigation. In R. Leow (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning 104–18. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-8

Bransford, J. D. (1979) Human Cognition: Learning, Understanding and Remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Brown, R. (1973) A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Culman, H., Henry, N. and VanPatten, B. (2009) The role of explicit information in instructed SLA: an on-line study with processing instruction and German accusative case inflections. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 42(1): 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1221.2009.00032.x

Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K. and Losardo, D. (2010) Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development 11(2): 121–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248371003699969

Doherty, S. (2018) Analysing variable relationships and time-course data in eye-tracking studies of translation processes and products. In C. Walker and F. Federici (eds) Eye Tracking and Multidisciplinary Studies on Translation 71–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.143.05doh

Fernández, C. (2008) Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(3): 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080467

Han, Z.-H. (2016) A ‘reimagined SLA’ or an expanded SLA: a rejoinder to the Douglas Fir Group (2016). Modern Language Journal 100(4): 736–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12378

Idraranthe, B. (2019) Enhancement, attention and awareness: an eye-tracking study of English syntax. In R. Leow (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning 331–45. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-23

Issa, B. I. (2019) Examining the relationships between attentional allocation, working memory and second language development: an eye-tracking study. In R. Leow (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning 464–79. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-32

Issa, B. I. and Morgan-Short, K. (2019) Effects of external and internal attentional manipulations on second language grammar development: an eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(2): 389–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311800013X

Issa, B. I., Morgan-Short, K., Villegas, B. and Raney, G. (2015) An eye-tracking study on the role of attention and its relationship with motivation. In L. Roberts, K. McManus, N. Vanek and D. Trenkic (eds) EUROSLA Yearbook 15 114–42. Amsterdam,

Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.15.05iss

Lambert, C. and Kormos, J. (2014) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in task-based L2 research: toward more developmentally based measures of second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 35(5): 607–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu047

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1975) The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 9(4): 409–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585625

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015) Complexity theory. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (2nd edn) 227–44. New York: Routledge.

Lee, H. and Choi, H. (2019) Cognitive load, attention and incidental vocabulary learning: an eye-tracking study. In R. Leow (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning 286–301. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-20

Lee, J. F. (2019) The second language processing of passives, object pronouns, and null subjects: processing instruction compared to language experience. Hispania 102(1): 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2019.0013

Lee, J. F. and Benati, A. G. (2009) Research and Perspectives on Processing Instruction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215335

Lee, J. F. and Doherty, S. (2019a) Native and nonnative processing of active and passive sentences: the effects of processing instruction on the allocation of visual attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(4): 853–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311800027X

Lee, J. F. and Doherty, S. (2019b) The effects of implicit positive and negative feedback on processing subsequent linguistic target items: an eye-tracking study. In R. Leow (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning 363–76. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-25

Lee, J. F. and McNulty, E. M. (2013) The effects of languages background on the results of processing instruction on the Spanish subjunctive/indicative contrast after the adverb cuando. In J. F. Lee and A. G. Benati (eds) Individual Differences and Processing Instruction 49–82. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.

Lee, J. F. and VanPatten, B. (2003) Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Lee, J. F., Benati, A. G., Águilar-Sánchez, J. and McNulty, E. M. (2007) Comparing three modes of delivering processing instruction on preterite/imperfect distinction and negative informal commands in Spanish. In J. F. Lee and A. G. Benati (eds) Delivering Processing Instruction in Classroom and Virtual Contexts: Research and Practice 73–98. London: Equinox.

Leeser, M. J. (2018) A meta-analysis of processing instruction research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, Salamanca, Spain.

Leeser, M. J. and DeMil, A. (2013) Investigating the secondary effects of processing instruction in Spanish: from instruction on accusative clitics to transfer-of-training effects on dative clitics. Hispania 96(4): 748–761. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2013.0106

Leow, R. P. (2015) Explicit Learning in the L2 Classroom: A Student-centered Approach. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074

Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K. and Brown, G. D. A. (2009) No temporal decay in verbal short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(3): 120–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.003

Li, F. (2019) Explicit instruction, prior knowledge, depth of processing, and grammatical knowledge development of advanced EFL learners: the case of English subjunctive mood. In R. Leow (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning 347–60. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-24

Li, S. (2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: a meta-analysis. Language Learning 60(2): 309–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x

Lightbown, P. M. (2008) Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom second language acquisition. In Z. Han (ed.) Understanding Second Language Process 27–44.

Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690159-005

Lim, J. H. and Christianson, I. (2015) Second language sensitivity to agreement errors: evidence from eye movements during comprehension and translation. Applied Psycholinguistics 36(6): 1283–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000290

Long, M. M. (2017) Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): geopolitics, methodological issues, and some major research questions. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 1(1): 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.33314

Luck, S. J. and Vogel, E. K. (2013) Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(8): 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006

Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K. and Kaushanskaya, M. (2007) The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50(4): 940–67. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)

Martoccio, A. (2018) How does prior explicit knowledge affect the efficacy of explicit instruction and feedback? The case of the personal a in L2 Spanish. Language Teaching Research 22: 379–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816689802

McNeil, J. D. (1984) Reading Comprehension: New Directions for Classroom Practice. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A. and Magnuson, J. S. (2008) Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4): 475–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006

Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L. (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3): 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136

Rumelhart, D. E. and Ortony, A. (1977) The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro and W. E. Montague (eds) Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge 99–135. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315271644-10

Sachs, R. and Nakatsukasa, K. (2019) Aptitude treatment interactions in depth of processing: individual differences and prior linguistics coursework predict learners’ approaches to computer-mediated language learning activities. In R. Leow (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning 422–37. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-29

Sagarra, N. (2019) Individual differences in working memory and instructed SLA. In R. Leow (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning 452–63. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-31

Sanz, C. and Morgan-Short, K. (2004) Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: a computer-assisted study. Language Learning 54(1): 35–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00248.x

Sok, S., Kang, E. Y. and Han, Z. (2019) Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: a methodological synthesis. Language Teaching Research 23: 403–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776673

Stromswold, K. (2006) Why Children Understand and Misunderstand Sentences: An Eye Tracking Study of Passive Sentences. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report TR-85.

Thinglum, A. (2019) Levels of intake: a preliminary look at intake and eye fixation measures vis-à-vis type of linguistic item. In R. Leow (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning 61–75. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-5

Thinglum, A., Serafini, E. J. and Leow, R. P. (2019) Exploring the relationship between lexical processing during written production: a preliminary investigation. In R. Leow (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning 89–103. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-7

Uludag, O. and VanPatten, B. (2012) The comparative effects of processing instruction and dictogloss on the acquisition of the English passive by speakers of Turkish. IRAL 50(3): 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2012-0008

VanPatten, B. (2015) Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (2nd edn) 113–34. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203628942

VanPatten, B. (2017) Situating instructed language acquisition: facts about second language acquisition. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 1(1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.33315

VanPatten, B. and Cadierno, T. (1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(1): 225–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011979

VanPatten, B. and Oikkenon, S. (1996) Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18(4): 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015394

VanPatten, B. and Wong, W. (2004) Processing instruction and the French causative: another replication. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary 33–63. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610195

VanPatten, B., Collopy, E., Price, J. E., Borst, S. and Qualin, A. (2013) Explicit information, grammatical sensitivity, and the First-Noun Principle: a cross-linguistic study in processing instruction. Modern Language Journal 97(2): 506–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12007.x

Wong, W. (2010) Exploring discourse-level structured input activities with French causative. In A. G. Benati and J. F. Lee (eds) Processing Instruction and Discourse 198–216. London: Bloomsbury.

Wong, W. and Ito, K. (2018) The effects of processing instruction and traditional instruction on L2 online processing of the causative construction in French: an eyetracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40(2): 241–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000274

Yang, W. and Sun, Y. (2015) Dynamic development of complexity, accuracy and fluency in multilingual learners’ L1, L2 and L3 writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5(2): 298–308. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0502.09

Published

2020-10-16

How to Cite

Lee, J. F., & Doherty, S. (2020). Prior knowledge and other individual differences in the development of accuracy over the time-course of a pre-test/treatment/post-test study of instructed second language acquisition. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 4(2), 124–157. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.40608