The effect of developmentally moderated focus on form instruction in Indonesian kindergarten children learning English as a foreign language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.39724Keywords:
Indonesian kindergarten children, developmentally moderated focus on form, Processability Theory, instructed EFL, acquisition of plural markingAbstract
This short report summarises a current quasi-experimental investigation into the effect of developmentally moderated focus on form instruction (DMFonF; Di Biase 2002, 2008) in an EFL classroom in an Indonesian kindergarten. DMFonF is an instructional approach which combines Pienemann's (1984) teachability hypothesis within Processability Theory (Pienemann 1998, 2011) with Long's (1991) focus on form (FonF) feedback. Specifically, the current study focuses on the acquisition of English plural marking on nouns. One first-year Indonesian kindergarten class (K1) and one second-year kindergarten class (K2) participated in the study. Children in both K1 and K2 were assessed at the beginning of the study and all of them, bar one exception, were found to be at the lexical stage; that is, they produced only single words and formulaic expressions in English without any grammatical markings. Analyses for K1 after one semester of instruction with DMFonF indicated that all the children acquired lexical plural marking and nine out of ten children also acquired phrasal agreement between quantifiers and nouns. A comparison of these results with K2 children (who were one year ahead in their meaning-based instruction) suggests that DMFonF instruction is effective in promoting grammatical development in the second language acquisition of kindergarten children.
References
Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Di Biase, B. (2002). Focusing strategies in second language development: a classroom-based study of Italian L2 in primary school. In B. D. Biase (Ed.), Developing a second language, acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish. Melbourne: Language Australia.
Di Biase, B. (2008). Focus-on-form and development in L2 learning. In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 197-219). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2002). Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second language research, 18(3), 274-302.
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2015). The development of English as a second language. In C. Bettoni & B. D. Biase (Eds.), Grammatical Development in Second Languages: Exploring the Boundaries of Processability Theory (pp. 85-115). Italy: EuroSLA.
Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed second language acquisition: A literature review: Research Division, Ministry of Education Wellington, Australia.
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. New York: Routledge.
Itani-Adams, Y. (2007). Lexical and grammatical development in Japanese-English bilingual first language acquisition. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 165-190). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language learning. New York: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D., Terrell, T. D., Ehrman, M. E., & Herzog, M. (1984). A theoretical basis for teaching the receptive skills. Foreign Language Annals, 17(4), 261-275.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Routledge.
Lauder, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: a review of key factors. Makara Seri Sosial Humaniora, 12(1), 9-20.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Long, M. H. (1987). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in Second Language Acquisition: Multiple Perspectives Cambridge: Newbury House.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. D. Bot, C. Kramsh, & R. Ginsberg (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form Theory, research, and practice In C. Doughty & J. Wiiliams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: CUP.
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: an empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557-587.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory (Vol. 15). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending processability theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (Vol. 30, pp. 199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Salleh, R. T. A. M. (2017). Bilingual first language acquisition in Malay and English : a morphological and suprasegmental study in the development of plural expressions in a bilingual child. (PhD), Western Sydney University, Sydney.
Salleh, R. T. A. M., Kawaguchi, S., Jones, C., & Di Biase, B. (2016). The Development of Plural Expressions in a Malay-English Bilingual Child. An International Journal of Asian Literatures, Cultures and Englishes, 10(2), 111-131.
Sulistiyo, U. (2015). Improving English as a foreign language teacher education in Indonesia: the case of Jambi University. RMIT University.
Yamaguchi, Y. (2010). The acquisition of English as a second language by a Japanese primary school child: a longitudinal study from a processability viewpoint. (Doctoral), University of Western Sydney, Sydney.
