Engaging with the Church of Scientology and the Free Zone in the Field

Challenges, Barriers, and Methods

Authors

  • Aled J. Ll. Thomas The Open University Alt-Ac.UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsnr.41396

Keywords:

Scientology, Free Zone, fieldwork, methods, online

Abstract

An increasing number of scholars are turning their attention towards the study of Scientology, the New Religious Movement founded by L. Ron Hubbard. Such studies tend to focus on the institutionalized Church of Scientology (CoS). However, of increasing importance to the study of Scientology is the rise of the Free Zone—a category for groups of individuals who identify as Scientologists but practise outside the CoS. The CoS and Free Zone have experienced a turbulent history. Both groups often view one another with suspicion, raising debates concerning legitimacy and Scientological heresy. Successfully navigating between both the CoS and Free Zone in the field requires a careful approach on behalf of the scholar. Furthermore, working with both the CoS and Free Zone individually also presents specific challenges, particularly in terms of gaining the trust of fieldwork participants. This article draws from the author’s fieldwork with both the CoS and the Free Zone as a case study of the challenges faced when conducting fieldwork with minority groups in direct opposition to one another, and explores ethnographic issues that have arisen in the contemporary study of Scientology.

Author Biography

Aled J. Ll. Thomas, The Open University Alt-Ac.UK

Aled J. Ll. Thomas is a co-founder of Alt-Ac.UK and a Visiting Fellow at the Open University. He has recently completed his doctorate on the topic of Auditing in contemporary and Free Zone Scientologies. His research interests include fluid forms of contemporary religion, material culture, and lived religion. He has presented papers on his research at conferences in the UK, Europe, and USA. He is the author of the forthcoming Free Zone Scientology: Contesting the Boundaries of a New Religion.

References

Cowan, Douglas E. 2009. Researching Scientology: Perceptions, Premises, Promises, and Problematics. In Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis, 53–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.003.0004

Cusack, Carole M. 2016. “Squirrels” and Unauthorized Uses of Scientology: Werner Erhard and EST, Ken Dyers and Kenja, and Harvey Jackins and Re-Evaluation Counselling. In Handbook of Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis and Kjersti Hellesøy, 485–506. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004330542_023

Graham, Ruth 2014. Are Academics Afraid to Study Scientology? https://daily.jstor.org/scholarson-scientology/

Gregg, Stephen E. and Thomas, Aled J. Ll. 2019 “Scientology Inside Out: Complex Religious Belonging in the Church of Scientology and the Free Zone.” In The Insider Outsider Debate: New Perspectives in the Study of Religion, edited by George D. Chryssides and Stephen E. Gregg, 350–370. Sheffield: Equinox.

Grossman, Wendy M. 1995. alt.scientology.war. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.12/alt.scientology.war_pr.html

Hubbard, L. Ron 1950. Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health. Copenhagen: New Era Publications (this edition 2007).

Scientology: A History of Man. Copenhagen: New Era Publications.

Have You Lived Before This Life? Copenhagen: New Era Publications.

a. Keeping Scientology Working. https://stss.nl/stss-materials/English/Courses%20Black%20und%20White%20Printing%20EN_BW_CR/EN_BW_CR_Keeping_Scientology_Working__KSW.pdf

b.Safeguarding Technology. http://internationalfreezone.net/safeguardingtechnology.shtml

Introduction to Scientology Ethics. Copenhagen: New Era Publications.

Lamont, Stewart 1986. Religion Inc. The Church of Scientology. London: HARRAP.

Lewis, James R. 2009. Introduction. In Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis, 3–14. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780195331493.003.0001

Scientology: Up Stat, Down Stat. In The Cambridge Companion to New Religious Movements, edited by Olav Hammer and Mikael Rothstein, 133–149, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521196505.010

Free Zone Scientology and Other Movement Milieus: A Preliminary Characterization. Temenos: Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion 49(2): 255–276. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.8203

The Dror Center Schism, The Cook Letter and Scientology’s Legitimation Crisis. In Handbook of Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis and Kjersti Hellesøy, 462–484. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004330542_022

Monahan, Torin and Jill A. Fisher. 2015. Strategies for Obtaining Access to Secretive or Guarded Organizations. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 44(6): 709–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241614549834

Melton, J. Gordon. 2000. Studies in Contemporary Religion: The Church of Scientology. Salt Lake City, UT: Signature Books.

Birth of a Religion. In Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis, 17–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.003.0002

Peckham, Michael. 1998. New Dimensions of Social Movement/Countermovement Interaction: The Case of Scientology and its Internet Critics. The Canadian Journal of Sociology 23(4): 317–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341804

Rigal-Cellard, Bernadette. 2009. Scientology Missions International (SMI): An Immutable Model of Technological Missionary Activity. In Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis, 325–334. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.003.0017

Robertson, Bill. 1983. “Captain Bill Robertson at Crown Hotel Meeting 1983 East Grinstead Scientology.avi.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvfioivtY6c

Ron’s Org Committee. n.d. “Myths and Facts About Captain Bill Robertson.” http://ronsorg.com/roc/english/mythaboutcbr.htm

Schorey, Shannon T. S. 2016. “‘LRH4ALL!’”: The Negotiation of Information in the Church of Scientology and the Open Source Scientology Movement.” In Handbook of Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis and Kjersti Hellesøy, 341–359. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004330542_015

Scientology Cult. 2018. “The Indie 500.” http://www.scientology-cult.com/declarations-of-independence/the-indie-500.html South Park.

“Trapped in the Closet.” Directed by Trey Parker. Written by Trey Parker and Kenny Hotz. Comedy Central, November 16.

The Church of Scientology International. 1998. What is Scientology? California: Bridge Publications.

Thomas, Aled J. Ll. 2021. (Forthcoming). Free Zone Scientology: Contesting the Boundaries of a New Religion. London: Bloomsbury.

Urban, Hugh B. 2011. The Church of Scientology: A History of a New Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400839438

Wallis, Roy. 1976. The Road to Total Freedom: A Sociological Analysis of Scientology. London: Heinemann.

Westbrook, Donald. 2016. “Walking in Ron’s Footsteps: Pilgrimage Sites of the Church of Scientology.” Numen 63(1): 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685276-12341409

a. Among the Scientologists: History, Theology, and Praxis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190664978.001.0001

b. “Scientology Studies 2.0: Lessons Learned and Paths Forward.” Religion Compass 14(2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12345

Whitehead, Harriet. 1987. Renunciation and Reformulation: A Study of Conversion in an American Sect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Published

2020-11-25

How to Cite

Thomas, A. J. L. (2020). Engaging with the Church of Scientology and the Free Zone in the Field: Challenges, Barriers, and Methods. International Journal for the Study of New Religions, 10(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsnr.41396

Issue

Section

Articles