An investigation into the representation of women on ‘intimate wellness’ websites

Authors

  • Alexandra Woodward University of Brighton

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.22877

Keywords:

female agency, Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis (FCDA), specialised corpus, self-care, vagina, vulva, wellness

Abstract

‘Intimate wellness’ is an offshoot of the wellness industry in which brands promote products to women for the practice of vulval and vaginal self-care. This niche, but growing, consumer category is worthy of feminist research as it is concerned with health, beauty and the contemporary trend of destigmatising female genitalia. This research explores the representation of women in a corpus of intimate wellness websites by examining the agency and associated processes of the participants. It identifies the coexistence of conflicting discourses: essentialist feminism, neoliberal postfeminism and patriarchal tradition. Through new concepts, termed ‘assisted agency’ and ‘assisted processes’, this study illuminates the represented relationship between female consumers and female brand personae. Ultimately, it finds that these websites represent women as (potentially) agentful but not autonomous, constructing the idea that female empowerment is contingent on consumption.

Author Biography

  • Alexandra Woodward, University of Brighton

    Alexandra Woodward is a master’s graduate in sociolinguistics from the University of Brighton. She currently works as a freelance copywriter and consultant. Her research interests include representations of women in mass media, women’s bodies and language, and the wellness industry.

References

Barnett, Barbara (2006) Health as women’s work: a pilot study on how women’s magazines frame medical news and femininity. Women and Language 29(2): 1–12.

Baxter, Judith (2003) Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Braun, Virginia (2009a) Selling the ‘perfect’ vulva. In Cressida J. Heyes and Meredith Jones (eds) Cosmetic Surgery: A Feminist Primer 133–149. Farnham: Ashgate.

Braun, Virginia (2009b) ‘The women are doing it for themselves’: the rhetoric of choice and agency around female genital ‘cosmetic surgery’. Australian Feminist Studies 24(60): 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164640902852449

Braun, Virginia (2017) Rethinking Ruskin’s wife’s vulva. In Ana Sofia Elias, Rosalind Gill and Christina Scharff (eds) Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism 67–82. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-47765-1_3

Braun, Virginia and Wilkinson, Sue (2001) Socio-cultural representations of the vagina. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 19(1): 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830020032374

Cassano, Olivia (2018) Why are more women using beauty products on their vaginas? Dazed. Retrieved 21 August 2020 from https://www.dazeddigital.com/beauty/body/article/41438/1/women-beauty-products-vaginas-skincare

Conor, Bridget (2021) ‘How Goopy are you?’: women, Goop and cosmic wellness. European Journal of Cultural Studies 24(6): 1261–1281. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211055735

Dobson, Amy Shields, McDonald, Karalyn, Kirkman, Maggie, Souter, Kay and Fisher, Jane (2017) Invisible labour Tensions and ambiguities of modifying the ‘private’ body: the case of female genital cosmetic surgery. In Ana Sofia Elias, Rosalind Gill and Christina Scharff (eds) Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism 351–367. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47765-1_20

Fahs, Breanne (2014) Genital panics: constructing the vagina in women’s qualitative narratives about pubic hair, menstrual sex, and vaginal self-image. Body Image 11(3): 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.03.002

Fahs, Breanne (2017) Mapping ‘gross’ bodies: the regulatory politics of disgust. In Ana Sofia Elias, Rosalind Gill and Christina Scharff (eds) Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism 83–99. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47765-1_4

Fairclough, Norman (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson.

Gilbert, Jeremy (2013) What kind of thing is ‘neoliberalism’? New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics 80–81 (Winter): 7–22. https://doi.org/10.3898/newf.80/81.introduction.2013

Gill, Rosalind and Scharff, Christina (2011) New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism, and Subjectivity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Goop (2020) This smells like my vagina candle. Retrieved 19 August 2020 from https://shop.goop.com/shop/products/this-smells-like-my-vagina-candle?country=GBR

Halliday, Michael A.K. and Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. (2014) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.

Herskovitz, Stephen and Crystal, Malcolm (2010) The essential brand persona: storytelling and branding. Journal of Business Strategy 31(3): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756661011036673

Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubí?ek, Miloš, Ková?, Vojt?ch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel and Suchomel, Vít (2014) The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9

Lazar, Michelle M. (2006) ‘Discover the power of femininity!’: analyzing global ‘power femininity’ in local advertising. Feminist Media Studies 6(4): 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680770600990002

Lazar, Michelle M. (2007) Feminist critical discourse analysis: articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies 4(2): 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816

Lazar, Michelle M. (2009) Entitled to consume: postfeminist femininity and a culture of post-critique. Discourse & Communication 3(4): 371–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309343872

Lazar, Michelle M. (2011) The right to be beautiful: postfeminist identity and consumer beauty advertising. In Rosalind Gill and Christina Scharff (eds) New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity 37–51. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294523_3

Lazar, Michelle M. (2014) Feminist critical discourse analysis. In Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff and Janet Holmes (eds) The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 2nd ed. 180–199. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch9

Milani, Tommaso M. (2018) Is the rectum a gold mine? Queer theory, consumer masculinities, and capital pleasures. In Paul Baker and Giuseppe Balirano (eds) Queering Masculinities in Language and Culture 19–42. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95327-1_2

O’Keeffe, Anne and McCarthy, Michael (2010) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. London: Routledge.

O’Neill, Rachel (2020) Pursuing ‘wellness’: considerations for media studies. Television & New Media 21(6): 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420919703

O’Neill, Rachel (2021) ‘Glow from the inside out’: Deliciously Ella and the politics of ‘healthy eating’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 24(6): 1282–1303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420921868

Orgad, Shani and Gill, Rosalind (2022) Confidence Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Sauntson, Helen (2019) Researching Language, Gender and Sexuality: A Student Guide. London: Routledge.

Sunderland, Jane (2004) Gendered Discourses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

The Vagina Museum (2020) Our story. Retrieved 19 August 2020 from https://www.vaginamuseum.co.uk/about/story

van Leeuwen, Theo (2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vandenburg, Tycho and Braun, Virginia (2017) ‘Basically, it’s sorcery for your vagina’: unpacking Western representations of vaginal steaming. Culture, Health & Sexuality 19(4): 470–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2016.1237674

The Vulva Gallery (n.d.) @the.vulva.gallery. Instagram. Retrieved 15 September 2022 from https://www.instagram.com/the.vulva.gallery/?hl=en

Published

2023-07-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Woodward, A. (2023). An investigation into the representation of women on ‘intimate wellness’ websites. Gender and Language, 17(2), 174-197. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.22877