Intersections of race and gender in sexual assault trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.20884Keywords:
rape, intersectionality, African American English, legal discourse, intertextualityAbstract
This essay traces the development of intersectionality theory within the field of language and gender in relation to research on the language of rape trials. In early work on the topic, I used Judith Butler’s notion of the ‘rigid regulatory frame’ to understand the cultural intelligibility of certain kinds of rape victims in the legal system and the unintelligibility of others. But the inequities that complainants often experience in rape trials are not merely the result of sexism; rather, it is sexism and racism which together interact to disadvantage complainants and protect white male perpetrators, who occupy a privileged position within these contexts vis-à-vis men of colour. In line with recent work in the field, I end with an analysis of a rape case that demonstrates the necessity of attending to nonhegemonic masculinities and intersectionality.
References
Agha, Asif (2005) Voice, footing and enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1): 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38
Bucholtz, Mary (1999) You da man: narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3/4: 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00090
Butler, Judith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, Judith (2004) Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499627
Cameron, Deborah (2008) Theoretical issues for the study of gender and spoken interaction. In Pia Pichler and Eva Eppler (eds) Gender and Spoken Interaction 1–17. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280748_1
Chun, Elaine and Walters, Keith (2021) At the crossroads of language, race and sexuality. In Kira Hall and Rusty Barrett (eds) Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.42
Collins, Patricia Hill (2005) Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism. New York: Routledge.
Conley, John M. and O’Barr, William (2005) Just Words: Law, Language, and Power, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Connell, R.W. (1995) Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Crenshaw, Kimberlé (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and anti-racist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989(1): 139–167.
Crenshaw, Kimberlé (1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43(6): 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Ehrlich, Susan (2001) Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London: Routledge.
Ehrlich, Susan (2007) Legal discourse and the cultural intelligibility of gendered meanings. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4): 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00333.x
Ehrlich, Susan (2016) Post-penetration rape: coercion or freely-given consent? In Susan Ehrlich, Diana Eades and Janet Ainsworth (eds) Discursive Constructions of Consent in the Legal Process 47–70. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945351.003.0003
Ehrlich, Susan (2021) Raciolinguistic enregisterment, intersectionality and African American masculinity in the courtroom. Keynote Lecture, IGALA 11, Queen Mary, University of London.
Estrich, Susan (1987) Real Rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hall, Kira (2021) Language in the middle: Class and sexuality on the Hinglish continuum. Journal of Sociolinguistics 25(3): 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12485
Hildebrand-Edgar, Nicole and Ehrlich, Susan (2017) ‘She was quite capable of asserting herself’: powerful speech styles and assessments of credibility in a sexual assault trial. Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito 4(2): 89–107.
Inoue, Miyako (2006) Vicarious Language: Gender and Linguistic Modernity in Japan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Levon, Erez (2015) Integrating intersectionality in language, gender and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass 9(7): 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12147
Levon, Erez and Ye, Yang (2020) Language, indexicality and gender ideologies: contextual effects on the perceived credibility of women. Gender and Language 14(2): 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.39235
MacKinnon, Catharine (1987) Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2070528
Marcus, Sharon (1992) Fighting bodies, fighting words: a theory and politics of rape prevention. In Judith Butler and Joan Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political 385–403. London: Routledge.
Morgan, Marcyliena H. (2021) Counterlanguage powermoves in African American women’s language practice. Gender and Language 15(2): 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.20317
Rickford, John and King, Sharese (2016) Language and linguistics on trial: hearing Rachel Jeantel (and other vernacular speakers) in the courtroom and beyond. Language 92(4): 948–988. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0078
Rosa, Jonathan and Flores, Nelson (2017) Unsettling race and language: toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society 46(5): 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000562
Shaw, Jessica and Lee, HaeNim (2019) Race and the criminal justice system response to sexual assault: A systematic review. American Journal of Community Psychology 64(1–2): 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12334
Steinem, Gloria (1983) Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Washington, Adrienne Ronee (2020) ‘Reclaiming my time’: signifying, reclamation and the activist strategies of Black women’s language. Gender and Language 14(4): 358–385. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.41607
Zavala, Virginia (2018) Correcting whose errors? the principle of error correction from an ethnographic lens. Language in Society 47(3): 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518000337
