Affordances of Web 2.0 Technologies for Collaborative Advanced Writing in a Foreign Language


  • Carola Strobl University College Ghent



Computer-supported collaborative writing (CSCW), Advanced foreign language writing, Revision process, Text quality, Peer feedback


Can online collaboration yield a positive effect on academic writing in a foreign language? If so, what exactly is the added value, compared to individual writing, and (how) does it translate to better output? These are the central questions addressed in this paper. L2 writing research has long highlighted the benefits of collaboration in terms of both L2 learning and text quality. Most recently, the positive effect of co-ownership and peer feedback on process and product has been emphasized in studies on Computer-Supported Collaborative Writing. What has remained underexplored is the impact of web 2.0 technologies on advanced L2 writing. The present paper bridges this gap through an empirical study combining Web 2.0 technologies with an academic writing task. Collaborative and individual writing processes and products are compared by applying a mixed-methods approach. The results shed new light on claims made in previous studies that collaboration leads to higher text accuracy. No statistically relevant difference was found between the individual and collaborative syntheses in terms of complexity, accuracy, and fluency. However, collaborative texts score significantly higher on appropriate content selection and organization. Analysis of the process data shows that this is due to in-depth discussions during the planning phase.

Author Biography

  • Carola Strobl, University College Ghent
    Carola Strobl is a Research Assistant at the Faculty of Applied Language Studies of University College Ghent. She has a teaching career as a German lecturer at universities in Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Belgium, and has been involved in several research projects on  technology-enhanced language learning. Currently, she is writing her dissertation entitled “Exploring the possibilities of online scaffolding for L2 academic writing in individual and collaborative settings”.


Alvarez, I., Espasa, A., & Guasch, T. (2012). The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 387-400. doi: 10.1080%2F03075079.2010.510182

Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2009). Collaborative writing in wikis: Insights from culture projects in German classes. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 115-144). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.

Blin, F., & Appel, C. (2011). Computer supported collaborative writing in practice: An activity theoretical study. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 473-497.

De la Colina, A. A., & García Mayo, M. d. P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. d. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91-116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-92). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.

Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5-23.

Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning and Technology, 14(3), 51-71.

Faigley, L., & Witte, S. P. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414. doi: 10.2307%2F356602

Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40-58. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.jslw.2011.12.002

Fung, Y. M. (2010). Collaborative writing features. RELC Journal, 41(1), 18-30.

Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79-95.

Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91-109.

Kost, C. (2011). Investigating writing strategies and revision behavior in collaborative wiki projects. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 606-620.

Lee, L. (2010). Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 260-276.

Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265-289. doi: 10.1016%2FS1060-3743%2899%2980117-9

Rummel, N., Spada, H., & Hauser, S. (2009). Learning to collaborate while being scripted or by observing a model. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 69-92. doi: 10.1007%2Fs11412-008-9054-4

Schulze, M., Wood, P., & Pokorny, B. Measuring balanced complexity. Unpublished manuscript.

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students´ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.jslw.2005.05.002

Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-185. doi: 10.1017%2FS0267190502000090

Thorne, S., & Reinhardt, J. (2008). Bridging activities, new literacies, and advanced language proficiency. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 558-572.

Wang, S., & Vásquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29(3), 412-430.

Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445-466. doi: 10.1177%2F026553220 9104670







How to Cite

Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 Technologies for Collaborative Advanced Writing in a Foreign Language. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 1-18.