The Effectiveness of Duolingo English Courses in Developing Reading and Listening Proficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.26704Keywords:
Duolingo, efficacy, English, reading proficiency, listening proficiency, MALLAbstract
This study evaluated the reading and listening proficiency levels of 245 English language learners who completed the Basic content (through Common European Framework of Reference for Languages [CEFR] level A2) of one of the following three Duolingo English courses: English for Japanese, Spanish, or Portuguese speakers. Participants self-reported having little to no prior proficiency in English and used Duolingo as their only learning tool. Their language skills were measured using the reading and listening sections of the STAMP 4S English Test from Avant Assessment. The results show that, on average, learners at the end of the Basic content (A2) scored Intermediate High in both reading and listening in all three courses. Given that Duolingo’s English courses are CEFR-aligned with an expected proficiency outcome of Intermediate Mid upon completion of the A2 content, it is noteworthy that participants across the three studied courses surpassed these expectations by achieving an additional American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Language (ACTFL) sublevel in both reading and listening. Such results present a robust and coherent body of evidence affirming the efficacy of Duolingo’s English courses in enhancing learners’ competencies in reading and listening comprehension.
References
ACTFL. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Retrieved June 2, 2023 from https://www.actfl.org/resources/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012
ACTFL. (n.d.). Assigning CEFR ratings to ACTFL assessments. Retrieved June 2, 2023 from https://www.actfl.org/uploads/files/general/Assigning_CEFR_Ratings_To_ACTFL_Assessments.pdf
Ajisoko, P. (2020). The use of Duolingo apps to improve English vocabulary learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(7), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i07.13229
Ajisoko, P. (2022). Using Duolingo apps to improve English reading comprehension of engineering students in Universitas Borneo Tarakan. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris [English Language Education Journal], 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v11i1.6452
Avant Assessment. (2023). STAMP scaled scores guide. Retrieved June 2, 2023 from https://avantassessment.com/stamp-scaled-scores-guide
Brown, K. (2023). CALL as a driver of equity, access, and outcomes in an increasingly connected world. Opening plenary at CALICO Annual Conference, June 7, 2003, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Burston, J., & Giannakou, K. (2022). MALL language learning outcomes: A comprehensive meta-analysis 1994–2019. ReCALL, 34(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000240
Bustillo, J., Rivera, C., Guzman, J. G., & Acosta, L. R. (2017). Benefits of using a mobile application in learning a foreign language. Sistemas Y Telematica, 15(40), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.18046/syt.v15i40.2391
Carpenter, S. K. (2020). Distributed practice/spacing effect. In L. Zhang (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education (pp. 1–20). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.859
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In J. Williams & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 94–112). New York: Routledge.
Fatmawati, I., Sudirman, A., & Munawaroh, T. (2023). The effect of using Duolingo application towards students’ grammar mastery in simple present tense. Journal of English Pedagogy and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.32627/jepal.v3i2.576
Heift, T., & Vyatkina, N. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning L2 grammar. In C. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 26–44). New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069.ch3
James, K. K., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Learning a second language by playing a game. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(4), 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3492
Jiang, X., Rollinson, J., Plonsky, L., Gustafson, E., & Pajak, B. (2021). Evaluating the reading and listening outcomes of beginning-level Duolingo courses. Foreign Language Annals, 54(4), 974–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12600
Kessler, M., Loewen, S., & Gonulal, T. (2023). Mobile-assisted language learning with Babbel and Duolingo: Comparing L2 learning gains and user experience. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2215294
Kim, S. K., & Webb, S. (2022). The effects of spaced practice on second language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 72(1), 269–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12479
Krashen, S. (2014). Does Duolingo “trump” university-level language learning? International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 13–15. Retrieved June 2, 2023 from https://sdkrashen.com/content/articles/krashen-does-duolingo-trump.pdf
Lin, C.-H., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Online foreign language education: What are the proficiency outcomes? Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 394–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12234_1
Loewen, S., & Hui, B. (2021). Small samples in instructed second language acquisition research. Modern Language Journal, 105(1), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12700
Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D., Kim, K., Maloney, J., Miller, Z., & Rawal, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000065
Loewen, S., Isbell, D. R., & Sporn, Z. (2020). The effectiveness of app-based language instruction for developing receptive linguistic knowledge and oral communicative ability. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12454
M Science. (2023). DUOL Q2’23 first look. Retrieved May 12, 2023 from https://mscience.com
Norouzian, R. (2020). Sample size planning in quantitative L2 research: A pragmatic approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(4), 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000017
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2012). Assessing learner knowledge. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 573–589). New York: Routledge.
Park, H. I., Solon, M., Dehghan-Chaleshtori, M., & Ghanbar, H. (2022). Proficiency reporting practices in SLA research: Have we made any progress? Language Learning, 72(1), 198–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12475
Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(4), 655–687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000399
Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 505–521). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-28
Rachels, J. R., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2018). The effects of a mobile gamification app on elementary students’ Spanish achievement and self-efficacy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1382536
Rohrer, D. (2015). Student instruction should be distributed over long time periods. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9332-4
Rolando, A. P. P., Gabriela, R. E. A., Carolina, M. S. E., & Antonio, A. R. M. (2019). Incidencia de Duolingo en el desarrollo de las habilidades comunicacionales verbales del idioma ingles a nivel de educación superior. European Scientific Journal, 15(16), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n16p29
Santos, V. (2022). The STAMP 4S English test reading and listening sections. Technical report shared by Avant Assessment.
Shortt, M., Tilak, S., Kuznetcova, I., Martens, B., & Akinkuolie, B. (2023). Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: A systematic review of Duolingo literature from public release of 2012 to early 2020, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3), 517–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1933540
Sudina, E., & Plonsky, L. (2023). The effects of frequency, duration, and intensity on L2 learning through Duolingo: A natural experiment. Journal of Second Language Studies, 7(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00021.plo
Tarone, E. (Ed.) (2015). Online foreign language education: What are the proficiency outcomes? Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12220
Thomas, M. (2006). Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. In L. Ortega & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 279–298). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.13.13tho
Winke, P., Gass, S. M., Soneson, D., Rubio, F., & Hacking, J. F. (2020). Foreign language proficiency test data from three American universities [United States], 2014–2017. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
![Open access logo](https://journal.equinoxpub.com/public/journals/5/submission_26704_25434_coverImage_en.png)