Multimodal Student Voice Representation Through an Online Digital Storytelling Project

Authors

  • Sergio Ruiz-Pérez Universidad Isabel I

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.24741

Keywords:

authoring, digital storytelling, multiliteracies, multimodality, student voice

Abstract

A thriving body of literature has identified student voice as being vital to education and literacy development. However, the understanding of multimodal student voice representation is still modest in literacy-based pedagogical practices. Thus, this article presents a study that examined the development of students’ multimodal authoring through the inclusion of multiliteracies in the higher education foreign language curriculum based on design analysis (Kalantzis et al., 2016) and the protocol Voice and Choice (Sheya, 2018) as a way to aid student voice representation. Specifically, the article describes the qualitative analysis of the design choices resulting from the collaborative work of three students during an online course project (CP) implemented in an intermediate intensive L2 Spanish undergraduate hybrid course. The CP was based on the tenets of (1) multiliteracies and (2) digital storytelling in combination with (3) a protocol that guides students to look into the voices and perspectives of specific content. The results showed that participants described the elements of digital storytelling design in depth, monomodally, and multimodally. Also, when creating their digital story, they expanded their authorial choices, honed their sensitivity in selecting fitting voices and perspectives to express an intentional message, and reflected on whose voices were missing from the content. This investigation offers insight into and advances understanding of the existing body of literature on multiliteracies, multimodal authoring, and student voice representation.

Author Biography

  • Sergio Ruiz-Pérez, Universidad Isabel I

    Dr. Ruiz-Pérez is currently a Professor at Universidad Isabel I in Burgos, Spain, where he coordinates the official Master of Spanish as a Foreign Language program, and he is an instructor in the Master’s degree in Teacher Training for Secondary Education, the Bachelor’s degree in Primary Education, and in the Language School. He earned his PhD in Hispanic Linguistics from Texas Tech University and Bachelor’s degrees in English Studies and in Translation and Interpreting from the Universidad de Valladolid. His research interests are in second language writing, multiliteracies, online learning and teaching, and instructional design.

References

Allen, D., Blythe, T., Dichter, A., & Lynch, T. (2018). Protocols in the classroom: Tools to help students read, write, think, and collaborate. New York: Teachers College Press.

Allen, H. W., & Gamalinda, S. (2021). Making podcasts in the collegiate French writing course. CALICO Journal, 38(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.40912

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chiaravalloti, C. (2010). “Wouldn’t she notice he had mud on his shirt?” Scaffolding meaningful discussions. Voices from the Middle, 18(2), 16–25.

Cloonan, A., Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). Schemas for meaning-making and multimodal texts. In T. Locke (Ed.), Beyond the grammar wars: A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom (pp. 264–285). New York: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.

Elliott-Johns, S. E., Booth, D., Rowsell, J., Puig, E., & Paterson, J. (2012). Using student voices to guide instruction. Voices from the Middle, 19(3) 25–31.

Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002

Guzmán, E. E., Lapuerta, P. E., & Liskin-Gasparro, J. E. (2019). Unidos: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Pearson Education.

Hafner, C. A. (2015). Remix culture and English language teaching: The expression of learner voice in digital multimodal compositions. Tesol Quarterly, 49(3), 486–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.238

Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710

Hagood, M. C. (2000). New times, new millennium, new literacies. Literacy Research and Instruction, 39(4), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070009558328

Hämäläinen, R., Kiili, C., & Smith, B. E. (2017). Orchestrating 21st century learning in higher education: A perspective on student voice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 1106–1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12533

Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Chan, E., & Dalley-Trim, L. (2016). Literacies. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442821

Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kern, R. (2015). Language, literacy and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Knudsen, A.. (2019). Cambios [video]. June 4. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgV7Km9Bg2g

Kurek, M., & Hauck, M. (2014). Closing the “digital divide”: A framework for multiliteracy training. In G. Pettes Guikema & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign and second language education: Research, perspectives, and best practice (pp. 119–140). San Marcos: CALICO.

Lacorte, M. (2016). Teacher development in heritage language education. In M. Fairclough & S. Beaudrie (Eds.), Innovative strategies for heritage language teaching: A practical guide for the classroom (pp. 99–122). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

Lambert, J. (2007). Digital storytelling. Futurist, 41(2), 25–25.

Lambert, J. (2010). Digital storytelling cookbook. Berkeley: Digital Diner Press.

Mattoon, M. (2015). What are protocols? Why use them? Bloomington: National School Reform Faculty, Harmony Education Center. https://www.nsrfharmony.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/WhatAreProtocolsWhyUse_0.pdf

Menke, M. R., & Paesani, K. (2019). Analysing foreign language instructional materials through the lens of the multiliteracies framework. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1461898

Michelson, K., & Dupuy, B. (2014). Multi-storied lives: Global simulation as an approach to developing multiliteracies in an intermediate French course. L2 Journal, 6(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.5070/L26119613

Mills, K. (2006). Discovering design possibilities through a pedagogy of multiliteracies. Journal of Learning Design, 1(3), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v1i3.33

Nelson, M. E. (2006). Mode, meaning, and synaesthesia in multimedia L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 56–76.

Nelson, M. E. (2008). Multimodal synthesis and the voice of the multimedia author in a Japanese EFL context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501220802158826

New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u

Öman, A., Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2015). Design and redesign of a multimodal classroom task: Implications for teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 139–159.

Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2020). Digital L2 writing literacies: Directions for classroom practice. Sheffield: Equinox.

Paesani, K., Allen, H. W., & Dupuy, B. (2016). A multiliteracies framework for collegiate foreign language teaching. Boston: Pearson.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000

Project Zero (2016). PZ. Cambridge: Harvard Graduate School of Education. http://www.pz.harvard.edu

Quinn, S., & Owen, S. (2016). Digging deeper: Understanding the power of “student voice.” Australian Journal of Education, 60(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944115626402

Sheya, S. (2018). Voice and Choice. Cambridge: Harvard Graduate School of Education. http://www.pz.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/AbD%20Voice%20and%20Choice.pdf

Sperling, M., & Appleman, D. (2011). Voice in the context of literacy studies. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.46.1.4

Tardy C. M. (2012). Current conceptions of voice. In K. Hyland & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825_3

Tardy, C. M. (2016). Voice and identity. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 349–363). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511335-019

Towndrow, P. A., & Pereira, A. J. (2018). Reconsidering literacy in the 21st century: Exploring the role of digital stories in teaching English to speakers of other languages. RELC Journal, 49(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218754943

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and word. In L. Vygotsky, E. Hanfmann, & G. Vakar (Eds.), Thought and language (pp. 119–153). Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-007

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Yang, Y. F. D. (2012). Multimodal composing in digital storytelling. Computers and Composition, 29(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2012.07.001

Published

2023-11-02

How to Cite

Ruiz-Pérez, S. (2023). Multimodal Student Voice Representation Through an Online Digital Storytelling Project. CALICO Journal, 40(3), 335-356. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.24741