Examining Visual Metadiscourse in EFL Students’ Infographics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.24502Keywords:
digital multimodal composing, infographic, multimodal genre, visual metadiscourseAbstract
As multimodal texts become ubiquitous in the digital age, analyzing how writers interact with readers via visuals is becoming increasingly important. Enlightened by Kress and van Leeuwen’s (1996, 2001) semiotic work, D’Angelo (2010) extended Hyland’s (2000) text-based metadiscourse model and proposed a new framework for analyzing the visual metadiscourse of multimodal texts. We used D’Angelo’s (2016) visual metadiscourse framework to evaluate the comprehensibility and organization of the EFL students’ infographics in this study. Two research questions guided our inquiry: (1) How do EFL students use diverse visual metadiscourse resources in their infographic posters? (2) In what ways, if any, does the use of visual interactive resources relate to the assessed quality of the infographics? We collected a total of 122 infographic posters and coded 5 categories of interactive resources for each poster (i.e., information value, framing, connective elements, graphic elements, and fonts), and then carried out frequency counts for each category and subcategories, taking all the posters into account. Moreover, we graded the EFL students’ infographics according to a multi-traits grading rubric, and then conducted multiple regression analyses of their use of visual interactive resources and the scores for their infographics in the aspect of visual effects. The results show that the students used diverse visual interactive resources to guide their audience through the text. The assessed quality of the infographics was found to be significantly correlated with the use of graphic elements and fonts. This study sheds new light on digital multimodal pedagogy, particularly on the role of visual metadiscourse in teaching and assessing multimodal texts in language/writing classrooms.
References
Arola, K. L. (2010). The design of Web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.004
Belcher, D. D. (2017). On becoming facilitators of multimodal composing and digital design. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.10.004
D’Angelo, L. (2010). Creating a framework for the analysis of academic posters (pp. 38–50). University of Reading Language Studies Working Papers No. 2.
D’Angelo, L. (2016). Academic posters: A textual and visual metadiscourse analysis. Bern: Peter Lang.
Davis, M., & Quinn, D. (2014). Visualizing text: The new literacy of infographics. Reading Today, 31(3), 16–18.
Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710
Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2018). English in the disciplines: A multidimensional model for ESP course design. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452437
Hung, H. T., Chiu, Y. C. J., & Yeh, H. C. (2013). Multimodal assessment of and for learning: A theory-driven design rubric. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01337.x
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
Jiang, L. (2018). Digital multimodal composing and investment change in learners’ writing in English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.002
Jiang, L., & Luk, J. (2016). Multimodal composing as a learning activity in English classrooms: Inquiring into the sources of its motivational capacity. System, 59, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.04.001
Kim, Y., & Belcher, D. (2020). Multimodal composing and traditional essays: Linguistic performance and learner perceptions. RELC Journal, 51(1), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220906943
Kim, Y., & Kang, S. (2020). Writing to make meaning through collaborative multimodal composing among Korean EFL learners: Writing processes, writing quality and student perception. Computers and Composition, 58, 102609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102609
Kohnke, L., Jarvis, A., & Ting, A. (2021). Digital multimodal composing as authentic assessment in discipline-specific English courses: Insights from ESP learners. TESOL Journal, 12(3), e600. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.600
Krauss, J. (2012). Infographics: More than words can say. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(5), 10–14.
Kress, G. (2004). Reading images: Multimodality, representation and new media. Information Design Journal, 12(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.12.2.03kre
Kress, G., & Selander, S. (2012). Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition. Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.003
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
Kumpf, E. P. (2000). Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250009364707
Li, M. (2021). Researching and teaching second language writing in the digital age. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87710-1
Li, M., & Pham, Q. N. (2022). Three heads are better than one? Students’ digital multimodal writing completed collaboratively vs. individually. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221102536
Maamuujav, U., Krishnan, J., & Collins, P. (2019). The utility of infographics in L2 writing classes: A practical strategy to scaffold writing development. TESOL Journal, 11(2), e484. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.484
McCrorie, A. D., Donnelly, C., & McGlade, K. (2016). Infographics: Healthcare communication for the digital age. Ulster Medical Journal, 85(2), 71–75.
Mendenhall, A. S., & Summers, S. (2015). Designing research: Using infographics to teach design thinking in composition. Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies, and Emerging Pedagogies, 3(1), 359–371.
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2016). Digital stories: Bringing multimodal texts to the Spanish writing classroom. ReCALL, 28(3), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000094
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2020). Digital L2 writing literacies: Directions for classroom practice. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
Pham, Q. N., & Li, M. (2022). Digital multimodal composing using Visme: EFL students’ perspectives. Asian-Pacific Education Researcher, 32, 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00687-w
Purdy, J. P. (2014). What can design thinking offer writing studies? College Composition and Communication, 65(4), 612–641.
Roberts, S., & Philip, R. (2006). The grammar of visual design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1299
Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 67–80). New York: Guilford Press.
Vandommele, G., Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., & De Maeyer, S. (2017). In-school and out-of-school multimodal writing as an L2 writing resource for beginner learners of Dutch. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.010
Yi, Y., & Angay-Crowder, T. (2016). Multimodal pedagogies for teacher education in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 988–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.326
Yi., Y., Shin, D., & Cimasko, T. (2020). Special issue: Multimodal composing in multilingual learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100717
Zhang, M., Akoto, M., & Li, M. (2021). Digital multimodal composing in post-secondary L2 settings: A review of the empirical landscape. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 694–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1942068
