Inadequate Aural Vocabulary Knowledge of High-Frequency Words
Can Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Help Solve the Problem?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.23455Keywords:
L2 listening, aural vocabulary knowledge (AVK), mobile-assisted language learning (MALL), English as a foreign language (EFL)Abstract
Aural vocabulary knowledge (AVK) of high-frequency words is critical for second language listening comprehension. However, learners of English as a foreign language (EFL), despite considerable periods of language study, often do not have the AVK needed for basic communicative competence. A mixed methods approach is applied to determine whether mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) can help solve this problem. First, a cohort of 33 Japanese EFL students with suboptimal AVK were divided into a treatment group (n = 17) and a control group (n = 16). Over a two-month period, the treatment group used a MALL application that enabled self-assessment and teacher monitoring of learners’ AVK of 1,000 frequently occurring English words. A comparison of pre- and post-test scores between the treatment and control group suggested that the MALL intervention was associated with improvements in AVK. Further, data stored by the application enabled an analysis of the words learners found most difficult, and interviews with a sub-group (n = 5) were undertaken. Results suggested that reduced forms and the influence of Japanese phonotactics were key factors limiting the ability to recognize spoken words. Links to resources that can help learners improve AVK of high-frequency words are provided and pedagogical implications are discussed.
References
Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N. (2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.425
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
Carney, N. (2021). Diagnosing L2 listeners’ difficulty comprehending known lexis. TESOL Quarterly, 55(2), 536–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3000
Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for teaching with CALL: Practical approaches to computer-assisted language learning. White Plains: Pearson Education.
Cheng, J., & Matthews, J. (2018). The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading. Language Testing, 35(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216676851
Cheng, J., Matthews, J., Lange, K., & McLean, S. (2023). Aural single-word and aural phrasal verb knowledge and their relationships to L2 listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 57(1), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3137
Educational Testing Service (2019). Mapping the TOEIC test on the CEFR. https://www.ets.org/pdfs/toeic/toeic-mapping-cefr-reference.pdf
Field, J. (2008). Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening. System, 36(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.10.003
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2017). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813349
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Connectionist models of language processing and the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.16.5.413.29488
Jia, C., & Hew, K. F. (2021). Meeting the challenges of decoding training in English as a foreign/second language listening education: Current status and opportunities for technology-assisted decoding training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(5–6), 1116–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1974051
Lange, K., & Matthews, J. (2020). Exploring the relationships between L2 vocabulary knowledge, lexical segmentation, and L2 listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(4), 723–749. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.4.4
Lange, K., & Matthews, J. (2021). Analyzing trends in the aural decoding errors of Japanese EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61(2), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2020-0050
Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00972.x
Masuda, H., & Arai, T. (2010). Processing of consonant clusters by Japanese native speakers: Influence of English learning backgrounds. Acoustical Science and Technology, 31(5), 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.31.320
Matthews, J. (2018). Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System, 72, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.10.005
Matthews, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System, 52, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.015
Matthews, J., Cheng, J., & O’Toole, J. M. (2015). Computer-mediated input, output and feedback in the development of L2 word recognition from speech. ReCALL, 27(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000421
Matthews, J., O’Toole, J. M., & Chen, S. (2017). The impact of word recognition from speech (WRS) proficiency level on interaction, task success and word learning: Design implications for CALL to develop L2 WRS. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1–2), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1129348
Matthews, J., Masrai, A., Lange, K., McLean, S., Alghamdi, E. A., Kim, Y. A., Shinhara, Y., & Tada, S. (2023). Exploring links between aural lexical knowledge and L2 listening in Arabic and Japanese speakers: A close replication of Cheng, Matthews, Lange and McLean (2022). TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3212
Oakes, J. M., & Feldman, H. A. (2001). Statistical power for nonequivalent pretest-posttest designs: The impact of change-score versus ANCOVA models. Evaluation Review, 25(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X0102500101
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
Siegel, J. (2016). Listening vocabulary: Embracing forgotten aural features. RELC Journal, 47(3), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216645477
Vafaee, P., & Suzuki, Y. (2020). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000676
Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams074
Wallace, M. P. (2022). Individual differences in second language listening: Examining the role of knowledge, metacognitive awareness, memory, and attention. Language Learning, 72(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12424
Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. (2009). Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59(2), 335–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.x
