The Impact of Virtual Reality on L2 French Learners’ Language Anxiety and Oral Comprehensibility

An Exploratory Study

Authors

  • Tricia Thrasher University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.42198

Keywords:

virtual reality, foreign language anxiety, French, oral production, physiological measures

Abstract

Research has noted that virtual reality (VR) environments can lessen language learners’ foreign language anxiety (FLA). However, previous research has relied primarily on participants’ qualitative opinions, leading to a lack of studies empirically assessing how VR impacts anxiety and, consequently, second language (L2) oral production. This pilot study addresses these gaps by exploring how VR influences the self-reported and physiological FLA and oral comprehensibility of 25 L2 French learners. Participants completed four comparable interpersonal consensus building tasks over eight weeks: two in the social VR application, vTime XR™, and two in a traditional classroom. Immediately following each task, participants self-assessed their anxiety. Moreover, a subsample of participants’ self-reported anxiety data was complemented with a physiological indicator of anxiety, salivary cortisol, to evaluate using this biomarker in FLA research. Participants’ speech for all tasks was rated by four native French speakers for comprehensibility. Descriptive statistics are presented. Self-reported anxiety and cortisol data indicated that participants were less anxious in VR and throughout the eight weeks. A positive correlation was found between self-reported and cortisol data, indicating consistency between these two anxiety measures. Finally, raters found participants to be more comprehensible in VR and when they self-reported lower anxiety.

Author Biography

Tricia Thrasher, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign

Tricia Thrasher is a PhD candidate in the department of French and Italian at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her primary research interests include immersive technologies for language learning, foreign language anxiety and oral production, and subjective and objective anxiety measurements.

References

American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Alexandria: ACTFL. https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/public/ACTFLProficiencyGuidelines2012_FINAL.pdf

Bonner, E., & Reinders, H. (2018). Augmented and virtual reality in the language classroom: Practical ideas. Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33–53. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1186392.pdf

Botes, E., Dewaele, J.-M., & Greiff, S. (2020). The foreign language classroom anxiety scale and academic achievement: An overview of the prevailing literature and a meta-analysis. International Association for the Psychology of Language Learning, 2(1), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.52598/jpll/2/1/3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52598/jpll/2/1/3

Castillejo, S. P. (2019). The role of foreign language anxiety on L2 utterance fluency during a final exam. Language Testing, 36(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218777783 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218777783

Chateau, A., Ciekanski, M., Paris, J., & Privas-Bréauté, V. (2019). Adding virtual reality to the university self-access language centre: Brave new world or passing fad? European Journal of Language Policy, 11(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2019.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2019.15

Chien, S. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Jong, M. S. J. (2019). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 146(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751

Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (2009). Comprehensibility as a factor in listener interaction preferences: Implications for the workplace. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.2.181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.2.181

Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L., & Molka-Danielsen, J. (2009). Designing oral participation in Second Life—A comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL, 21(2), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000196

Dewaele, J. M., & Alfawzan, M. (2018). Does the effect of enjoyment outweigh that of anxiety in foreign language performance? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.2

Dewey, D. P., Belnap, R. K., & Steffan, P. (2018). Anxiety: Stress, foreign language classroom anxiety, and enjoyment during study abroad in Amman, Jordan. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 140–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190518000107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190518000107

Gregersen, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Meza, M. (2014). The motion of emotion: Idiodynamic case studies of learners’ foreign language anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12084

Gruber, A., & Kaplan-Rakowski, R. (2020). User experience of public speaking practice in virtual reality. In R. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive and affective perspectives on immersive technology in education (pp. 235–249). Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3250-8.ch012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3250-8.ch012

Gruber, A., & Kaplan-Rakowski, R. (2022). The impact of high-immersion virtual reality on foreign language anxiety when speaking in public. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3882215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3882215

Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x

Kaplan-Rakowski, R., & Meseberg, K. (2018). Immersive media and their future. In R. M. Branch, H. Lee, & S. Tseng (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (vol. 42, pp. 143–153). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27986-8_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27986-8_13

Kaplan-Rakowski, R., & Wojdynski, T. (2018). Students’ attitudes toward high-immersion virtual reality assisted language learning. In P. Taalas, J. Jalkanen, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Future-proof CALL: Language learning as exploration and encounters—Short papers from EUROCALL 2018 (pp. 124–129). Research-publishing.net.https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.824

Kessler, G. (2017). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318

Kirschbaum, C., & Hellhammer, D. C. (2007). Salivary cortisol. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (vol. 2, pp. 405–409). Oxford: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373947-6.00334-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373947-6.00334-2

Liaw, M. (2019). EFL learners’ intercultural communication in an open social virtual environment. Educational Technology and Society, 22(2), 38–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26819616

MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language learning: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere (pp. 24–45). Boston: McGraw-Hill College.

MacIntyre, P. D. (2017). An overview of language anxiety research and trends in its development. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J. M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 11–30). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783097722-003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783097722-003

MacIntyre, P. D., & Vincze, L. (2017). Positive and negative emotions underlie motivation for L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.4

Melchor-Couto, S. (2016). Foreign language anxiety levels in Second Life oral interaction. ReCALL, 29(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000185

Melchor-Couto, S. (2018). Virtual world anonymity and foreign language oral interaction. ReCALL, 30(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000398

Mroz, A. (2015). The development of second language critical thinking in a virtual language learning environment: A process-oriented mixed-method study. CALICO Journal, 32(3), 528–553. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.26386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.26386

Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x

Plonsky, L. (2015). Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870908

Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Methodological review article: How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079

R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org

Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2014). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCALL, 27(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000226

Salimetrics, LLC. (2020). Collection methods: SalivaBio Oral Swab (SOS) method. State College: Salimetrics. https://salimetrics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/oral-swab-saliva-collection-device-instructions.pdf

Scovel, T. (1978). The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of the anxiety research. Language Learning, 28(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00309.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00309.x

Szyszka, M. (2017). Pronunciation learning strategies and language anxiety: In search of an interplay. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50642-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50642-5

Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000311

Thomson, R. I. (2018). Measurement of accentedness, intelligibility and comprehensibility. In O. Kang & A. Ginther (Eds.), Assessment in second language pronunciation (pp. 11–29). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170756-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170756-2

Tsai, C. F., Yeh, S. C., Huang, Y., Wu, Z., Cui, J., & Zheng, L. (2018). The effect of augmented reality and virtual reality on inducing anxiety for exposure therapy: A comparison using heart rate variability. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2018(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6357351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6357351

Wehner, A. K., Gump, A. W., & Downey, S. (2011). The effects of Second Life on the motivation of undergraduate students learning a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.551757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.551757

Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC Journal, 37(3), 308–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206071315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206071315

Xie, Y., Ryder, L., & Chen, Y. (2019). Using interactive virtual reality tools in an advanced Chinese language class: A case study. TechTrends, 63(1) 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00389-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00389-z

Yen, Y. C., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Applying role-playing strategy to enhance learners’ writing and speaking skills in EFL courses using Facebook and Skype as learning tools: A case study in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.839568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.839568

York, J., Shibata, K., Tokutake, H., & Nakayama, H. (2021). Effect of SCMC on foreign language anxiety and learning experience: A comparison of voice, video, and VR-based oral interaction. ReCALL, 33(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000154

Zhang, X. (2019). Foreign language anxiety and foreign language performance: A meta-analysis. Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 763–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12590

Ziegler, N. (2016). Taking technology to task: Technology-mediated TBLT, performance, and production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000039

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Thrasher, T. (2022). The Impact of Virtual Reality on L2 French Learners’ Language Anxiety and Oral Comprehensibility: An Exploratory Study. CALICO Journal, 39(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.42198

Issue

Section

Articles