A Blended-learning Pedagogical Model for Teaching and Learning EFL Successfully Through an Online Interactive Multimedia Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i3.533-550Keywords:
EFL and ICT, Blended Learning, E-Learning, Interactive Multimedia Environments for SLA, Feedback, Teachers' RolesAbstract
Faced with the need to teach English to a large number of students, the Universidad de Concepción, Chile, has created an innovative Communicative English Program using ICT, which is made up of four modules covered in four academic terms. The English program aims to develop integrated linguistic skills with a focus on learning for authentic communication. The program has been implemented in a blended-learning (b-learning) pedagogical model that includes: (a) learners' work with UdeC English Online, software conceived as the backbone of the entire Communicative English Program, (b) online monitoring, (c) face-to-face EFL teacher-led classes, and (d) conversation classes with native speakers of English. The online software is an interactive multimedia environment which houses all the materials and ICT tools that learners need in one central web platform. Some of the core concepts underlying its design are multimodal L2 input exposure, enhanced input, learner-fit content delivery, interaction (human-computer, human-human, and intrapersonal) through computer supported collaborative and individual learning tasks, as well as a more human-like dimension for positive and corrective feedback. This paper describes the elements of the b-learning model, issues about its implementation, and results obtained in the piloting of its first module.
References
Byram, M., & Fleming, M. (1998). Language learning in intercultural perspectives: Approaches through drama and ethnography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical basis of communicative approaches to second language and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1 (1), 1-47.
Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (1), 22-34. Retrieved February 14, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article1
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on teaching and research in the age of information and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Chapelle, C. A. (2005). Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research. In J. Egbert & G. Petrie, (Eds.), Research perspectives on CALL (pp. 53-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coley, M., & Griffin, P. (1987). Contextual factors in education. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (2002, February). Computer-assisted language learning and distance learning. Paper presented at the Conference on Less Commonly Taught Languages, CLEAR, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Chun, D. C., & Plass, J. L. (2000). Networked multimedia environments for second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concept and practice (pp. 151-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (2002). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.
Doughty, C. J. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13 (4), 431-469.
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (3), 50-80. Retrieved February 14, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/doughty/default. html
Egbert, J., & Hanson-Smith, E. (Eds.). (1999). CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Company.
Felix, U. (2003). Teaching languages online: Deconstructing the myths. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19 (1), 118-138.
Ferreira, A. (2003). Feedback strategies for second language teaching with implications for intelligent tutorial systems (ITS) for second language teaching and learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Edinburgh, UK.
Ferreira, A., Bañados, E., & Salazar, O. (2004-2006). FONDECYT-1040500 research project: Effective corrective-feedback strategies in second language teaching with implications for intelligent tutorial systems (ITS) for foreign language and second language teaching and learning.
Flowerdew, J. (1993). Content-based language instruction in a tertiary setting. English for Specific Purposes, 12 (1), 121-138.
Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. G. (1990). Teaching mind and society: A theory of education and schooling. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 175-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levy, M. (1997). Computer assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (1), 27-56.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (1), 37-66.
Marsh, G. E., McFadden, A. C., & Price, B. (2003, Winter). Blended instruction: Adapting conventional instruction for large classes. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6 (4). Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://www.westga. edu/~distance/ojdla/winter64/marsh64.htm
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
Penfield, J. (1987). The media: Catalysts for communicative language learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, Paninos, F. D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30 (1), 59-84.
Reid-Young, A. (2003, First Quarter). The key to successful e-learning is b-learning. HCI, Journal of Information Development. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http:// www.hci.com.au/hcisite2/journal/Key%20to%20elearning%20is%20blearning. htm
Robinson, G. L. (1993). Culture learning in the foreign language classroom: A model for second culture acquisition. In B. A. Lafford & M. Shockey (Eds.), Culture and content: Perspectives on the acquisition of cultural competence in the foreign language classroom. Tempe, AZ: Southwest Conference on Language Teaching.
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the noticing hypothesis. Language Learning, 45 (2), 283-331.
Rosset, A., Douglis, F., & Frazee, R. V. (2003, June 30). Strategies for building blended learning. Learning Circuits. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://www.learn ingcircuits.org/2003/jul2003/rossett.htm
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35 (1), 31-38.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 (2), 165-179.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11 (1), 17-46.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Snyder, T., & Palmer, J. (1986). In search of the most amazing thing: Children, education and computers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Stoller, F. (1997). Project work: A means to promote language content. English Teaching Forum, 35 (4), 2.
Squires, D., & McDougall, A. (1997). Cómo elegir y utilizar software educativo. España: Fundación Paideia.
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81 (4), 470-481.
Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1988). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
