Development and Implementation of a Learning Object Repository for French Teaching and Learning

Issues and Promises


  • Catherine Caws



Learning Object Repository (LOR), French, Design Experiment, Evaluation


This paper discusses issues surrounding the development of a learning object repository (FLORE) for teaching and learning French at the postsecondary level. An evaluation based on qualitative and quantitative data was set up in order to better assess how second-language (L2) students in French perceived the integration of this new repository into their course and study practice. A total of 46 students participated in the study and provided feedback that will be recycled into developmental changes for the repository. Based on a design experiment methodology, the research provides specific implication for the integration of online resources in a course or program of study. Initial results of the experiment supports the development of online tools such as FLORE while at the same time suggesting the value of carefully implementing such computer-based tools into a curriculum.


Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bates, A.W., & Poole, G. (2003). Effective teaching with technology in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Beaudoin, M. (2004). A principle-based approach to teaching grammar on the web. ReCALL, 16(2), 462-474.

Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). New York: Open University Press.

Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.

Caws, C. (2005). Evaluating a learning objects repository: A pilot study. The IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 37(1), 51-62.

Caws, C., Friesen, N., & Beaudoin, M. (2006). A new learning object repository for language learning: Methods and possible outcomes. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 2, 111-124.

Chanier, T. (2000). Hypermedia, interaction et apprentissage dans des systèmes d’information et de communication: résultats et agenda de recherche. In L. Duquette & M. Laurier (Eds.), Apprendre une langue dans un environnement multimédia (pp. 53-89). Outremont, Québec: Les éditions logiques.

Chapelle, C. A. (2000). Interaction, communication et acquisition d’une langue seconde en ELAO. In L. Duquette & M. Laurier (Eds.), Apprendre une langue dans un environnement multimédia (pp. 19-51). Outremont, Québec: Les éditions logiques.

Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.

Colaric , S., & Jonassen, D. (2001). Information equals knowledge, searching equals learning, and hyperlinking is good instruction: Myths about learning from the World Wibe Web. In C. Maddux & D. Lamont (Eds.), The web in higher education (pp. 159-169). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

Friesen, N. (2004). Three objections to learning objects. In R. McGreal (Ed.), Online education using learning objects (pp. 59-70). London: Routledge Falmer.

Gonglewski, M., & DuBravac, S. (2006). Multiliteracy: Second language literacy in the multimedia environment. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (pp. 43-68). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.

Kellner, D. (1998). Multiple literacies and critical pedagogy in a multicultural society. Educational Theory, 48(1), 103-122.

Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 183-210.

Krauss, F., & Ally, M. (2005). A study of the design and evaluation of a learning object and implications for content development. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1(1), 1-22.

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Maki, P. (2004). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution. Sterling, VA: American Association for Higher Education.

Meunier, L.E. (2000). La typologie des intelligences humaine et artificielle: complexité pédagogique de l’enseignement des langues étrangères dans un environnement multimédia. In L. Duquette & M. Laurier (Eds.), Apprendre une langue dans un environnement multimédia (pp. 211-257). Outremont, Québec: Les éditions logiques.

Millar, G. (2002). Learning objects 101: A primer for neophytes. Sidebars. Retrieved March 15, 2005, from

Mortimer, L. (2002). (Learning) objects of desire: Promise and practicality. Learning circuits. Retrieved April 1, 2005, from

Nash, S. S. (2005). Learning objects, learning object repositories, and learning theory: Preliminary best practices for online courses. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1(2), 217-228.

Nesbit, J. C., Belfer, K., & Vargo, J. (2002). A convergent participation model for evaluation of LOs. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 28(3), 105-120.

Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.

Redon-Dilax, M. (2000). Scénario pédagogique et hypertexte. In L. Duquette & M. Laurier (Eds.), Apprendre une langue dans un environnement multimedia (pp. 93-116). Outremont, Québec: Les éditions logiques.

Richards, G., McGreal, R., Hatala, M., & Friesen, N. (2002). Learning object repository technologies: Portals for on-line objects for learning. Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 67-79.

Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shetzer, H., & Warschauer, M. (2000). An electronic literacy approach to network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 171-185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thorne, S. L., & Payne, J. S. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 371-397. Retrieved May 13, 2008, from

Vargo et al. (2003). Learning object evaluation: Computer-mediated collaboration and interrater reliability. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 25(3), 1-8.

Warschauer, M. (2003, August). Demystifying the digital divide. Scientific American, 42-47.

Wiley, D. (2003). Learning objects: Difficulties and opportunities. Retrieved March 15, 2005, from







How to Cite

Caws, C. (2013). Development and Implementation of a Learning Object Repository for French Teaching and Learning: Issues and Promises. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 123-141.