A Comparison of Student Participation Levels by Group Size and Language Stages during Chatroom and Face-to-Face Discussions in German
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i1.67-97Keywords:
Synchronous Communication in German, Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) versus Face-to-Face Communication, Students' Level of Participation Related to Group Size, Evaluation of Language Stages Produced by German Students at the Intermediate LevelAbstract
This article seeks to contribute to the ongoing exploration of computer-assisted language learning (CALL), in particular synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) used in a university environment, and attempts to find answers to the following two research questions: (a) How is the level of participation in communicative interactions distributed among participants? and (b) What kind of language is the language learner engaged in during small chatroom sessions in comparison to small-group face-to-face sessions? This study compared the level of participation among 27 students and contrasted their written German chatroom discourse with their oral discourse produced in small face-to-face discussion groups. First, the level of participation was measured by coding the data with communication units, or c-units. Second, the overall level of participation among groups with five students was compared to groups with only four students. Finally, the study investigated the language levels produced in both discussion modes by applying a scale of language stages as described by Tschirner (1996).
References
Anderson-Inman, L. (1996). Synchronous writing environments: Real-time interaction in cyberspace (technology tidbits). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40, 134-138.
Beauvois Healy, M. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 455-464.
Beauvois Healy, M. (1997). Computer-mediated communication: Technology for improving speaking and writing. In M. Bush & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Technology Enhanced Language Learning (pp. 165-184). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
Brock, C. A. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 47-59.
Bratton, E. G. (1997). OTChat-personal TCP/IP chat server [software program]. Retrieved from http://www.bratton.com/egb/otchat.html
Bump, J. (1990). Radical changes in class discussion using networked computers. Computer and the Humanities, 24, 49-65.
Butler, W. (1989). The construction of meaning in an electronic interpretive community. In T. W. Batson (Ed.), Proposal abstracts from the 5th computers and writing conference, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, May 12-14, 1989 (pp. 89). Washington DC: Gallaudet University.
Chafe, W., & Danielewicz, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written Language. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 83-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Chun, D. (1996). Real-time class discussion on a LAN. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Virtual connections (pp. 80-82). Honolulu, Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i Press.
Colomb, G., & Simutis, J. A. (1996). Visible conversation and academic inquiry: CMC in a culturally diverse classroom. In S. Hering (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 203-222). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Crookes, G. (1990). The utterance, and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 11, 183-199.
DiMatteo, A. (1991). Under erasure: A theory for interactive writing in real time. Computers and Composition, 8, 71-84.
Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 147181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Kelm, O. R. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-454.
Kemp, F. (1993, Winter). The Daedalus integrated writing environment. Educators’ Tech Exchange, 24-30.
Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
Kroonenberg, N. (1996). Diad debate. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Virtual connections (pp. 77-79). Honolulu, Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i Press.
Lixl-Purcell, A. (1995). Rückblick. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Loban, W. (1966). Language ability: Grades seven, eight, and nine. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
Salaberry, M. R. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. Modern Language Journal, 84, 28-37.
Sullivan, N. (1993). Teaching writing on a computer network. TESOL Journal, 3, 34-35.
Tschirner, E. (1996). Scope and sequence: Rethinking beginning foreign language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 80, 1-14.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
