Recent Developments in Technology and Language Learning
A Literature Review and Meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i1.7-27Keywords:
Effectiveness of Technology in Language Education, Limitations of Research Studies, Literature Review, Meta-analysisAbstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the potential of technology for improving language education. A review of the effectiveness of past and current practices in the application of information and communication technology(ICT) in language education and the availability as well as capacities of current ICTs was conducted. The review found that existing literature on the effectiveness of technology uses in language education is very limited in four aspects: a) The number of systematic, well-designed empirical evaluative studies of the effects of technology uses in language learning is very small, b) the settings of instruction where the studies were conducted were limited to higher education and adult learners, c) the languages studied were limited to common foreign languages and English as a foreign or second language, and d) the experiments were often short-term and about one or two aspects of language learning (e.g., vocabulary or grammar). However the limited number of available studies shows a pattern of positive effects. They found technology-supported language learning is at least as effective as human teachers, if not more so.
References
Adair-Hauk, B., Willingham-McLain, L., & Youngs, B. E. (2000). Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal, 17 (2), 269-305.
Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5 (1), 202-232. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/alseghayer/default.html
Bacon, S., & Finnemann, M. (1990). A study of the attitudes, motives, and strategies of university foreign language students and their disposition to authentic oral and written input. The Modern Language Journal, 74, 459-473.
Beauvois, M. H. (1997). Computer-mediated communication(CMC): Technology for improving speaking and writing. In R. M. Terry (Ed.), Technology enhanced language learning (pp. 165-184). Lincolnwood, IL: The National Textbook Company.
Bernstein, J. (1997). Automatic spoken language assessment by telephone (Tech. Rep. No. 5-97). Menlo Park, CA: Entropic, Inc.
Bernstein, J., Cohen, M., Murveit, H., Rtischev, D., & Weintraub, M. (1990). Automatic evaluation and training in English pronunciation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Kobe, Japan.
Bernstein, J., Najmi, A., & Ehsani, F. (1999). Subarashii: Encounters in Japanese spoken language education. CALICO Journal, 16 (3), 361-384.
Burston, J. (2001). Exploiting the potential of a computer-based grammar checker in conjunction with self-monitoring strategies with advanced level students of French. CALICO Journal, 18 (3), 499-515.
Cahill, D., & Catanzaro, D. (1997). Teaching first-year Spanish online. CALICO Journal, 14 (2-4), 97-114.
Cavanaugh, C. S. (2001). The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7 (1), 73-88.
Chao, C.-C. (1999). Theory and research: New emphases of assessment in the language learning classroom. In E. Hanson-Smith (Ed.), CALL Environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 243-256). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Chapelle, C. A. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms. Language Learning & Technology, 1 (1), 19-43. Retrieved from http://llt.msu. edu/vol1num1/chapelle/default.html
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 1 (1), 60-81. Retrieved from http://llt.msu. edu/vol1num1/chun_plass/default.html
Coniam, D. (1998). The use of speech recognition software as an English language oral assessment instrument: An exploratory study. CALICO Journal, 15 (4), 7-24.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in schools 1980-2000. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dalby, J., & Kewley-Port, D. (1999). Explicit pronunciation training using automatic speech recognition technology. CALICO Journal, 16 (3), 425-445.
Egan, K. B. (1999). Speaking: A critical skill and a challenge. CALICO Journal, 16 (3), 277-293.
Egbert, J., Chao, C.-C., & Hanson-Smith, E. (1999). Computer-enhanced language learning environment: An overview. In E. Hanson-Smith (Ed.), CALL environments: research, practice and critical issues (pp. 1-16). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Ehsani, F., & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (1), 45-60. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article3/ index.html
Eskenazi, M. (1999). Using a computer in foreign language pronunciation training: What advantages? CALICO Journal, 16 (3), 447-469.
Glass, G. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
Glass, G. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351-379.
Gonzalez-Bueno, M. (1998). The effects of electronic mail on Spanish L2 discourse. Language Learning & Technology, 1 (2), 55-70. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol1num2/article3/default.html
Green, A., & Youngs, B. E. (2001). Using the web in elementary French and German courses: Quantitative and qualitative study results. CALICO Journal, 19 (1), 89-123.
Hanson-Smith, E. (1999). Classroom practice: Using multimedia for input and interaction in CALL environments. In E. Hanson-Smith (Ed.), CALL environments: research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 189-215). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Harless, W. G., Zier, M. A., & Duncan, R. C. (1999). Virtual dialogues with native speakers: The evaluation of an interactive multimedia method. CALICO Journal, 16 (3), 313-337.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.
Herron, C., Cole, S. P., Corrie, C., & Dubreil, S. (1999). The effectiveness of a videobased curriculum in teaching culture. The Modern Language Journal, 83 (4), 518-533.
Herron, C., Dubreil, S., Cole, S. P., & Corrie, C. (2000). Using instructional video to teach culture to beginning foreign language students. CALICO Journal, 17 (3), 395-430.
Holland, V. M., Kaplan, J. D., & Sabol, M. A. (1999). Preliminary tests of language learning in a speech-interactive graphics microworld. CALICO Journal, 16 (3), 339359.
Jacobs, G., & Rodgers, C. (1999). Treacherous allies: Foreign language grammar checkers. CALICO Journal, 16 (4), 509-529.
Johnson, B. (1999). Theory and research: Audience, language use, and language learning. In E. Hanson-Smith (Ed.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 55-64). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Kelm, O. R. (1998). The use of electronic mail in foreign language classes. In K. Arens (Ed.), Language learning online (pp. 141-154). Austin, TX: The Daedalus Group Inc.
Kitajima, R., & Lyman-Hager, M. A. (1998). Theory-driven use of digital video in foreign language instruction. CALICO Journal, 16 (1), 37-48.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Labrie, G. (2000). A French vocabulary tutor for the web. CALICO Journal, 17 (3), 475499.
Lafford, P. A., & Lafford, B. A. (1997). Learning language and culture with the Internet. In R. M. Terry (Ed.), Technology-enhanced language learning. Lincolnwood, IL: The National Textbook Company.
LaRocca, S. A., Morgan, J. J., & Bellinger, S. M. (1999). On the path to 2X learning: Exploring the possibilities of advanced speech recognition. CALICO Journal, 16 (3), 295-309.
Lee, L. (1998). Going beyond classroom learning: Acquiring cultural knowledge via online newspapers and intercultural exchanges via online chatrooms. CALICO Journal, 16 (2), 101-120.
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71 (3), 449-521.
Lyman-Hager, M. A. (2000). Bridging the language-literature gap: Introducing literature electronically to the undergraduate language student. CALICO Journal, 17 (3), 431-452.
Lyons, L. C. (1995a). Meta-analysis: Methods of accumulating results across research domains [web]. Retrieved December 20, 2001, from http://www.mnsinc.com/ solomon
Lyons, L. C. (1995b). The meta-analysis calculator : A SuperCard project for conducting a meta-analysis based on Hunter, Schmidt, and Jackson (1982) and Hunter and Schmidt (1990) (Version 1.0). Manassas, VA: Author.
Mostow, J., & Aist, G. (1999). Giving help and praise in a reading tutor with imperfect listening—Because automated speech recognition means never being able to say you’re certain. CALICO Journal, 16 (3), 407-424.
Muyskens, J. A. (1998). New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Nagata, N. (1993). Intelligent computer feedback for second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 330-339.
Nutta, J. (1998). Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher-directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? CALICO Journal, 16 (1), 4961.
Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In R. Kern (Ed.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pennington, M. C. (1996). The power of the computer in language education. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 1-14). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (Panel on Educational Technology). (1997). Report to the president on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington, DC: President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology.
Rosenthal, R. (1973). The Pygmalion effect lives. Psychology Today, 7 (4), 56-60.
Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85 (1), 39-56.
Schultz, J. M. (2000). Computers and collaborative writing in the foreign language curriculum. In R. Kern (Ed.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 121-150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shea, P. (2000). Leveling the playing field: A study of captioned interactive video for second language learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22 (3), 243-263.
Sinyor, R. (1997). An analysis of student behavior and error sources in an Italian CALL context. CALICO Journal, 14 (2-4), 35-50.
Thorton, P., & Dudley, A. (1996). The CALL environment: An alternative to the language lab. CAELL Journal, 7 (4), 29-34.
Wachowicz, K. A., & Scott, B. (1999). Software that listens: It’s not a question of whether, it’s a question of how. CALICO Journal, 16 (3), 253-276.
Warschauer, M. (1998). Researching technology in TESOL: Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (4), 757-761.
Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Weyers, J. R. (1999). The effects of authentic video on communicative competence. The Modern Language Journal, 83 (3), 339-349.
Zhao, Y. (1997). The effects of listener’s control of speech rate on second language comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 18 (1), 49-68.
