Computer Supported Collaborative Writing in Practice
An Activity Theoretical Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.473-497Keywords:
Cultural-historical Activity Theory (CHAT), Computer Supported Collaborative Writing in L2 (CSWL2), Interaction, Peer EditingAbstract
This paper addresses issues of language use and negotiation and utilizes cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) as a framework to analyze and understand the complexity of the mediational and collaborative structures constituting computer supported collaborative writing in a second language (CSCWL2) activities. Following an introduction to CHAT as an analytic framework, the article then presents the preliminary results of an activity theoretical study exploring the establishment and development of collaborative writing practices among a group of English as a foreign language distance learning students. The analysis focuses firstly on the goal-oriented actions carried out by students as they revised their writing, and secondly, on the emergence of deviations from planned normal procedures, as outlined in task guidelines, that resulted in different modes of interaction. The findings highlight the pivotal role of artifacts used and created by students in mediating their collective practice. They also reveal the emergence of different modes of interaction, i.e., coordination, cooperation and reflective communication. We suggest that while a cooperation mode of interaction afforded the development of language awareness and language use, the lack of transition to a reflective mode of communication and/or the contraction of the activity to coordination and cooperation modes constrained the further attainment of learning outcomes.
References
Alm, A. (2006). CALL for autonomy, competence and relatedness. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(3), 29-38.
Chaiklin, S., Hedegaard, M., & Jensen, U.J. (Eds.). (1999). Activity theory and social practice: Culturalhistorical approaches. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1978). Introduction. In L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in society (pp. 1-14). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. A. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–193). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research (1st ed.). Oxon: Routledge.
Donato R., & McCormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 453-464.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language, Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51-71.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133-156.
Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and Learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hakkarainen, K. (2009). Three generations of technology-enhanced learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 879-888.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B.A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79-95.
Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41-58.
Kirschner, P. (2002). Can we support CCSL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. In P. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 7-47). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, L. (2010). Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 260-276.
Lektorsky, V. A. (2009). Mediation as a means of collective activity. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K.D. Gutièrrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 75-87). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273-290.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). The long and the short of it: Comments on multiple timescale studies of human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 17-26.
Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review, 6(1). Retrieved from http://wwwstatic.kern.org/filer/blogWrite44ManilaWebsite/paul/articles/A_
Pedagogy_of_Multiliteracies_Designing_Social_Futures.htm.
Lund, A., & Rasmussen, I. (2008). The right tool for the wrong task? Match and mismatch between first and second stimulus in double stimulation. The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 387-412.
McCafferty, S. G., Roebuck, R. F., & Wayland, R. P. (2001). Activity theory and the incidental learning of second-language vocabulary. Language Awareness, 10(4), 289-294.
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor–An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535-557.
Roebuck, R. (2000). Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 79–96). New York: Oxford University Press.
Roth, W. M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186 -232.
Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504–554.
Sykes, J., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 528-546.
Thorne, S. L. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. Modern Language Journal, 89, 393-409.
Thorne, S. L., & Black, R. (2007). Language and literacy development in computer-mediated contexts and communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 133-160.
Thorne, S. L., & Payne, J. S. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, internet mediated expression, and language education, CALICO Journal, 22(3), 371-397.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
