Conversation Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.308-325Keywords:
Text-based Computer-mediated Communication, Conversation Analysis, L2 Learning, Trouble-talkAbstract
The potential of computer-mediated communication (CMC) for language learning resides mainly in the possibility that learners have to engage with other speakers of the language, including L1 speakers. The inclusion of CMC in the L2 classroom provides an opportunity for students to utilize authentic language in real interaction, rather than the more traditional institutionally asymmetric, nonnegotiable, and teacher controlled classroom discourse. However, still much research is needed addressing what happens during CMC interaction and the effectiveness of this tool for language learning. This article explores the potential of conversation analysis (CA) to contribute to the understanding of L2 CMC. It presents previous CA research on synchronous CMC (SCMC) and L2 interaction, and, as an illustration of how CA can be employed for the study of CMC, a longitudinal case study of a Spanish L2 learner engaged in interaction with a L1 Spanish speaker is microanalyzed using CA. Finally, the article outlines the strengths of CA for the analysis of CMC and identifies the limitations of the method both for the study of CMC as well as for language learning in general and provides future possible lines of research.
References
Androutsopoulos, J., & Beisswenger, M. (2008). Introduction: Data and methods in computer-mediated discourse analysis. Language@Internet, 5. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1609
Bauer, B., deBenedette, L., Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., & Waryn, S. (2006). The Cultura project. In J. A. Belz & S. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 31-62). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Beauvois, M. H. (1997). Write to speak: The effects of electronic communication on the oral achievement of fourth semester French students. In J. A. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 198-217.
Beisswenger, M. (2008). Situated chat analysis as a window to the user’s perspective: Aspects of temporal and sequential organization. Language@Internet, 5. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1532
Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68-117. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/belz/default.html
Belz, J. A. (2005). Intercultural questioning, discovery and tension in internet-mediated language learning partnerships. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5, 1-37.
Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2002). The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 189-214.
Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53, 591-647.
Boxer, D. (1993). Complaining and commiserating: A speech act view of solidarity in spoken American English. New York: Peter Lang.
Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 29-47.
Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35, 398-417
Egbert, M. (1996). Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye, gaze and the German repair initiator bitte? Language in Society, 25, 587-612.
Egbert, M., Niebecker, L., & Rezzara, S. (2004). Inside first and second language speakers’ trouble in understanding. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversation (pp. 178-200). London; New York: Continuum.
Freiermuth, M. R. (2002). Online chatting: An alternative approach to simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 32, 187-195.
Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The CULTURA project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55-102. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/furstenberg/default.html
Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 337-367.
Golato, A., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). Negotiation of face in chats. Multilingua, 25, 293-322.
González-Lloret, M. (2007). What do language learners attend to when their environment changes? In C. Periñan (Ed.), Revisiting language learning resources (pp. 223-242). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
González-Lloret, M. (2008). Computer-mediated learning of L2 pragmatics. In E. A. Soler & A. MartinezFlor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 114-132). Clevedon, UK Multilingual Matters.
González-Lloret, M. (2009). CA for computer-mediated interaction in the Spanish L2 classroom. In G. Kasper & H. Nguyen (Eds.), Conversation analytic studies of L1 and L2 interaction, learning, and education (pp. 281-316). Honolulu, HI: NFLRC and University of Hawaii Press.
Hauser, E. (2005). Coding ‘corrective recasts’: The maintenance of meaning and more fundamental problems. Applied Linguistics, 26, 293-316.
Have, P. ten (1990). Methodological issues in conversation analysis. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 27, 23-51. Retrieved from http://www.paultenhave.nl/mica.htm#N_21
Have, P. ten (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Sage.
He, A. W. (2004). CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 568-582.
Hellermann, J. (2006). Classroom interactive practices for developing L2 literacy: A microethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 377-404.
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html
Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; Oxford; Malden, MA: In association with Blackwell Publishers.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Ishida, M. (2006). Interactional competence and the use of modal expressions in decision-making activities: CA for understanding microgenesis of pragmatic competence. In K. Bardovi-Harling, J. C. Felix-Brasdefer, & A. S. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning: Vol. 11 (pp. 55-79). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35, 418-441.
Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. (1981). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 399-422.
Jenks, C. (2009). When is it appropriate to talk? Managing overlapping talk in multi-participant voicebased chat rooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 19-30.
Jepson, K. (2005). Conversations—and negotiated interaction—in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79-98. Retrieved from llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/pdf/jepson.pdf
Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 551-567.
Kasper, G. (2006). Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 19, 83-99.
Kasper, G., & Kim, Y. (2007). Handling sequentially inapposite responses. In Z. Wei, P. Seedhouse, L. Wei, & V. Cook (Eds.), Language learning and teaching as social interaction (pp. 22-41). Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
Kinginger, C. (Ed.). (2000). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 143-166.
Kitade, K. (2005). Interactional features of asynchronous computer-mediated communication for language learning: From cognitive and sociocultural perspectives (Unpublished dissertation). University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu.
Kroonenberg, N. (1995). Dyad debate. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Virtual connections: Online activities and projects for networking language learners (pp. 77-79). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, L. (1998). Going beyond classroom learning: Acquiring cultural knowledge via on-line newspapers and intercultural exchanges via on-line chatrooms. CALICO Journal, 16, 101-120. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=611
Lee, Y.-A. (2006). Towards respecification of communicative competence: Condition of L2 instruction or its objective? Applied Linguistics, 27, 349-376.
Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32, 177-201.
Magnan, S. (Ed.). (2004). The Modern Language Journal [Special issue]. 88(4).
Marcoccia, M., Atifi, H., & Gauducheau, N. (2008). Text-centered versus multimodal analysis of instant messaging conversation. Language@Internet, 5. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1621
Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Maywah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29, 404-427.
Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 491-500.
Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 501-518.
Mori, J. (2004a). Pursuit of understanding: Rethinking ‘negotiation of meaning’ in view of projected action. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 157-177). London: Continuum.
Mori, J. (2004b). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 536-550.
Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27, 195-219.
Murray, D. (1989). When the medium determines the truth: Turn-taking in computer conversation. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Working with language (pp. 319-337). The Hague: Mouton.
Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversational analysis approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 75-87. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/negretti
Nguyen, H. T. (2003). The development of communication skills in the practice of patient consultation among pharmacy students (Unpublished dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition: Processes in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversation (pp. 221-245). London: Continuum.
Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action and sense-making practices. In T. v. Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 1-37). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pudlinski, C. (2005). Doing empathy and sympathy: Caring responses to troubles telling on a peer support line. Discourse Studies, 7, 267-288.
Rintel, E. S., Pittam, J., & Mulholland, J. (2003). Time will tell: Ambiguous non-responses on internet relay chat. Electronic Journal of Communication, 13, 1-18. Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/getfile/rintel_v13n1
Rintel, S., Mulholland, J., & Pittam, J. (2001). First things first: Internet relay chat openings. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(3). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue3/rintel.html
Sacks, H. E., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language Awareness, 50, 696-735.
Sanders (2006). A comparison of chat room productivity: In-class versus out-of-class. CALICO Journal, 24, 59-76. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=89
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 23-78). New York: Irvington Publishers.
Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Parties and talking together: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talkin-interaction. In P. ten Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in social organization and embodied activities (pp. 31-42). Washington, D.C: University Press of America.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (2002a). Beginnings in the telephone. In E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 284-300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (2002b). Reflections on research on telephone conversation: Issues of cross-cultural scope and scholarly exchange, interactional import and consequences. In K. K. Luke & T. S. Pavlidou (Eds.), Telephone calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
Schegloff, E. A., Koshik, I., Jacoby, S., & Olsher, D. (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 3-31.
Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (Eds.). (1986). Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schönfeldt, J., & Golato, A. (2003). Repair in chats: A conversation analytic approach. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 241-284.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversational analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Selting, M. (1996). On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics, 6, 357-388.
Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.
Smith, B. (2008). Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 85-103. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num1/smith/default.html
Smith, B., & Gorsuch, G. J. (2004). Synchronous computer mediated communication captured by usability lab technologies: New interpretations. System, 32, 553-575.
Stommel, W. (2008). Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. Language@Internet, 5. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1537
Thorne, S. (2000). Beyond bounded activity systems: Heterogeneous cultures in instructional uses of persistent conversation. Paper presented at the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved from llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/pdf/thorne.pdf
Thorne, S. (2006). Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education research. In J. A. Belz & S. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 2-30). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141-159. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/tudini/default.html
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Wang, Y. (2004a). Distance language learning: Interactivity and fourth-generation internet-based videoconferencing. CALICO Journal, 21, 373-395. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=277
Wang, Y. (2004b). Supporting synchronous distance language learning with desktop videoconferencing. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 90-121. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/wang/default.html
Wang, Y. (2007). Task design in videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. CALICO Journal, 24, 591-630. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=662
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26 Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=604
Warschauer, M. (1998). Researching technology in TESOL: Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 757-761.
Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & Roberts, B. (1996). Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 14, 1-14.
Wong, J. (2005). Sidestepping grammar. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 159-173). Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wootton, A. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young, R., & Miller, E. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 519–535.
