Task-based oral computer-mediated communication and L2 vocabulary acquisition

Authors

  • I Yanguas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.507-531

Keywords:

Video CMC, Audio CMC, L2 vocabulary learning, attitudes

Abstract

The present study adds to the computer-mediated communication (CMC) literature by exploring oral learner-to-learner interaction using Skype, a free and widely used Internet software program. In particular, this task-based study has a two-fold goal: On the one hand, it explores possible differences between two modes of oral CMC (audio and video) and traditional face-to-face (FTF) interaction in terms of L2 vocabulary development. On the other, this study investigates participants’ perceptions regarding these computer-mediated modes of communication. A within groups pretest–posttest–delayed posttest design was employed in this study in which a total of fifty-eight third semester college students of Spanish participated. Twenty-nine conversational dyads were assigned to one of three different groups: Face-to-face, videoCMC, and audioCMC. Repeated measures ANOVA analyses were conducted on the scores of the final pool of participants (N=47) in production, recognition, and aural comprehension tests to investigate possible differences. Furthermore, descriptive analyses were carried out of participants’ answers to a debriefing questionnaire that tapped into their perceptions toward these CMC modes. Results showed no significant differences among the groups for production or written recognition measures. All participants, however, were able to retain their recognition ability (but not their production ability) after two weeks. Finally, a significant difference was found among the groups in aural comprehension measures: the audioCMC group outperformed both groups. Regarding participants’ attitudes toward the CMC modes used in this study, they had general positive attitudes that could be exploited in the L2 classroom.

References

Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 455-464.

Beauvois, M. H., & Eledge, J. (1996). Personality types and megabytes: Student attitudes toward computer mediated communication (CMC) in the language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 27-46.

Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html

Blake, R. (2008). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Blake, R., & Zyzik, E. (2003). Who’s helping whom? Learner/heritage-speakers’ networked discussions in Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 24, 519–544.

Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17-31.

Darhower, M. (2002). Instructional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19, 249-277.

De la Fuente, M. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 47-81.

Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualization of student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 519-538.

Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80. Availble at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/doughty/

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–326.

Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in non-native speaker—non-native speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19, 279-294.

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.

Gardner, R. C. (2000). Correlation, causation, motivation, and second language acquisition. Canadian Psychology, 41, 10-24.

Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266–272.

Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.

Hulstijn, J. H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P. J. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113–125). London: MacMillan.

Jepson, K. (2005). Conversations — and negotiated interaction — in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79-98. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/jepson/default.html

Kelm, O. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-454.

Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.

Lafford, P. A., & Lafford, B. A. (2005). CMC technologies for teaching foreign languages: What’s on the horizon? CALICO Journal, 22(3), 679-710.

Lee, L. (1999). Going beyond classroom learning: Acquiring cultural knowledge via on-line newspapers and intercultural exchanges via on-line chatrooms. CALICO Journal, 16(2), 101-118.

Lee, L. (2007). Fostering second language oral communication through constructivist interaction in desktop videoconferencing. Foreign Language Annals, 40(4), 635-649.

Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.

Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversations in the second language classroom. In M. A. Clarke & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL '82 (pp. 207-225). Washington, DC: TESOL.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2005). Foreign language learning with CMC: Forms of online instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian Class. System, 33(1), 89-105.

Osuna, M. M., & Meskill, C. (1998). Using the world wide web to integrate Spanish language and culture: A pilot study. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 71-92. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num2/article4/default.html

Payne, J. S., & Ross, B. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 34-54. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/payne/default.html

Pérez, L. C. (2003). Foreign language productivity in synchronous versus asynchronous computermediated communication. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 89-104.

Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.

Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and second language learning (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Sachs, R. & Suh, B. R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction and second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 197-227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 2-45). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2010). Investigating L2 performance in text chat. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 554-577.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.

Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 103-134. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/sengupta/default.html

Shekary, M., & Tahririan, M. H.(2006). Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 557-573.

Shin, D. (2006). ESL students’ computer-mediated communication practices: Context configuration.

Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 65-84. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/shin/

Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38-57.

Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365–398.

Smith, B. (2005). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 647-648.

Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/

Swain, M. K. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Swain, M. K. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Crookes & G. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Sykes, J. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 399-431.

Toyoda, E. & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82-99. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/toyoda/

Ushida, E. (2005). The role of students’ attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 49-78.

Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 69–87. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/warner/

Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.

Yanguas, I. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time! Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 72-93.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yanguas, I. (2013). Task-based oral computer-mediated communication and L2 vocabulary acquisition. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 507-531. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.507-531