A Critical Look at the Bigger Picture
Macro-Level Discourses of Language and Technology in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.35022Keywords:
language education, ecological CALL, critical discourse analysis, neoliberalismAbstract
Despite its numerous benefits and potentialities for language learning and teaching, digital technology can also play a role in creating and maintaining inequality (Kern, 2014; Selwyn, 2013). While critical CALL often focuses on micro-level issues and contexts, macro-level perspectives, including discourses, are also essential to consider (Helm, 2015): From ecological and language-as-discourse perspectives, macro-level discourses have the potential to impact and shape CALL practices and contexts (Blin, 2016; Blommaert, 2005). Using critical discourse analysis methods (Blommaert, 2005; Fairclough, 2001), this article takes the 2017 American Academy of Arts and Sciences (AAAS) report, "America's Languages: Investing in Language Education for the 21st Century," as a window into macro-level discourses of language and technology in American society today. Findings reveal a series of interrelated frames and scales that, taken together, suggest a neoliberal discourse that positioned language, technology, and ultimately CALL as tools to enhance national competitiveness on a global marketplace. The article concludes with implications of these findings for the CALL field.
References
Bae, S., & Park, J. S. Y. (2016). Becoming global elites through transnational language learning?: The case of Korean early study abroad in Singapore. L2 Journal, 8(2), 92–109.
Bernstein, K., Hellmich, E. A., Katznelson, N., Shin, J., & Vinall, K. (2015). Introduction to special issue: Critical perspectives on neoliberalism in second/foreign language education. L2 Journal, 7(3), 3–14.
Blin, F. (2016). Towards an ‘ecological’ CALL theory: theoretical perspectives and their instantiation in CALL research and practice. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 39–54). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657899
Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295
Commission on Language Learning. (2017). America’s languages: Investing in language education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA. Retrieved December 15, 2017, from https://www.amacad.org/multimedia/pdfs/publications/researchpapersmonographs/language/Commission-on-Language-Learning_Americas-Languages.pdf
Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences. (2013). The heart of the matter. Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.7748/nm2013.11.20.7.40.s22
Council on Foreign Relations. (2012). U.S. education reform and national security press release. Retrieved June 3, 2015, from http://www.cfr.org/united-states/us-education-reform-national-security/p27618
Duchêne, A., & Heller, M. (2012). Pride and profit: Changing discourses of language, capital, and nation-state. In A. Duchêne & M. Heller (Eds.), Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155868
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London, England: Longman.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hellmich, E. A. (2018). Language learning in a global world: A case study of foreign languages in US K-8 education. Foreign Language Annals, 51(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12333
Helm, F. (2015). Critical CALL. In F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 EuroCALL Conference (pp. xiii–xiv). Dublin, Ireland: Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000300
Hlas, A. C. (2018). Grand challenges and great potential in foreign language teaching and learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12317
Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2016). Theory in computer-assisted language learning research and practice. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 24–38). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657899
Kern, R. (2011). Technology and language learning. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 202–217). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the Internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12065.x
Kramsch, C. (2002). Introduction: “How can we tell the dancer from the dance?” In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Continuum.
Kramsch, C. (2005). Post 9/11: Foreign languages between knowledge and power. Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami026
Lo Bianco, J. (2014). Domesticating the foreign: Globalization’s effects on the place/s of languages. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12063.x
Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2016). An A-Z of applied linguistics research methods. London, England: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40322-3
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Motha, S. (2014). Race, empire, and English language teaching: Creating responsible and ethical anti-racist practice. New York, NY: Columbia University Teachers College.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11463
Park, J. S.-Y. (2015). Language as pure potential. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 4632(September), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1071824
Pennycook, A. (1994). Incommensurable discourses? Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.2.115
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
Perkins, J. A. (1980). Strength through wisdom: A critique of U.S. capability. The Modern Language Journal, 64(1), 9–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1980.tb05167.x
Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037
Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. New York, NY: Continuum.
Selwyn, N. (2013). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315886350
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Stemper, K. D., & King, K. A. (2017). Language planning and policy. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 655–673). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119072256.ch33
Teitelbaum, M. S. (2014). Falling behind?: Boom, bust, and the global race for scientific talent. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. Retrieved January 3, 2017, from http://tech.ed.gov/files/2015/12/NETP16.pdf
Valdez, V. E., Freire, J. A., & Delavan, M. G. (2016). The gentrification of dual language education. The Urban Review, 48(4), 601–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0370-0
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Veletsianos, G., & Rolin, M. (2017). The rise of educational technology as a sociocultural and ideological phenomenon. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved April 1, 2018, from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/4/the-rise-of-educational-technology-as-a-sociocultural-and-ideological-phenomenon
Watzke, J. L. (2003). Lasting change in foreign language education: A historical case for change in national policy. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
