An Effective Application of Natural Language Processing in Second Language Instruction

Authors

  • Noriko Nagata

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v13i1.47-67

Keywords:

Natural language processing, artificial intelligence, parsing, CALI, ICALI, Japanese, error analysis, feedback, second language instruction

Abstract

This paper presents an intelligent CALI system called "Nihongo-CALI" (Japanese Computer Assisted Language Instruction), which employs natural language processing to provide immediate, grammatically sophisticated feedback to students in an interactive environment. Using this system, Nagata (1993) previously compared the effectiveness of the two different levels of computer feedback for teaching Japanese passive sentences: traditional feedback (which follows simple pattern-matching error analysis and indicates only missing/unexpected words in the learners' responses) and intelligent feedback (which utilizes a parsing technique to provide detailed grammatical explanations for the source of the learners' errors). The study found a statistically significant difference between traditional and intelligent feedback, favoring intelligent feedback. The present study compares the efficacy of intelligent CALI feedback with that of a more advanced, traditional CALI feedback (which also indicates the positions of missing particles in the learners' responses) for teaching basic sentence constructions in Japanese. The result indicates that the Intelligent CALI feedback is more effective than even the enhanced version of traditional CALI feedback, underscoring the importance of natural language processing technology in second language instruction.

References

Bonner, Jodi (1987). “Computer Courseware: Frame-Based or Intelligent?” Educational Technology 27, 3, 30-35.

Carroll, S., and M. Swain (1993). “Explicit and Implicit Negative Feedback: An Empirical Study of the Learning of Linguistic Generalizations.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 357-386.

Ellis, Rod (1990). Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.

Hausser, Roland (1989). “Principles of Computational Morphology.” Unpublished manuscript. Carnegie Mellon University, Laboratory for Computational Linguistics.

Hart, Robert S. (1981). “Language Study and the Plato System.” Studies in Language Learning 3, 1-24.

Holland, Melissa, Richard Maisano, Cathie Alderks, and Jeffery Martin (1993). “Parsers in Tutors: What Are They Good For?” CALICO Journal 11, 1, 28-46.

Juozulynas, Vilius (1994). “Errors in the Compositions of Second-Year German Students: An Empirical Study for Parse-Based ICALI.” CALICO Journal 12, 1, 5-17.

Kuno, Susumu (1973). The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Labrie, Gilles, and L.P.S. Singh (1991). “Parsing, Error Diagnostics, and Instruction in a French Tutor.” CALICO Journal 9, 1, 9-25.

Levin, Lori, David A. Evans, and Donna Gates (1991). “The ALICE System: A Workbench for Learning and Using Language.” CALICO Journal 9, 1, 27-56.

Liou, Hsien-Chin (1991). “Development of an English Grammar Checker: A Progress Report.” CALICOJournal 9, 1, 57-70.

Long, H. Michael (1988). “Instructed Interlanguage Development.” Issues in Second Language Acquisition: Multiple Perspectives, edited by L. Beebe. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

______. (1983). “Does Second Language Instruction Make a Difference?” TESOL Quarterly 17, 3, 359-382.

Loritz, Donald (1992). “Generalized Transition Network Parsing for Language Study: the GPARS System for English, Russian, Japanese, and Chinese.” CALICO Journal 10, 1, 5-22.

Nagata, Noriko (1993). “Intelligent Computer Feedback for Second Language Instruction.” The Modern Language Journal 77, 3, 330-339.

______. (1992). A Study of the Effectiveness of Intelligent CALI as an Application of Natural Language Processing. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

______., andM. Virginia Swisher (1995). “A Study of Consciousness-Raising by Computer: The Effect of Metalinguistic Feedback on Second Language Learning.” Foreign Language Annals 28, 3, 337-347.

______. (1996). “The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Metalinguistic Instruction: A Case Study in Japanese.” Forthcoming in Foreign Language Annals.

Sanders, Ruth (1991). “Error Analysis in Purely Syntactic Parsing of Free Input: The Example of German.” CALICO Journal 9, 1, 72-89.

Si-Quing, Chen, and Xu Luomai (1990). “Grammar-Debugger: A Parser for Chinese EFL Learners.” CALICO Journal 8, 2, 63-75.

Tomita, Masaru, T. Mitamura, H. Musha, and M. Kee (1988). “The Generalized LR Parser/Compiler Version 8.1: User’s Guide.” CMU-CMT-88-MEMO. Carnegie Mellon University, Center for Machine Translation.

Yazdani, Masoud (1991). “The LINGER Project: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to SecondLanguage Tutoring.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 4, 2, 107-116.

Published

2013-01-14

How to Cite

Nagata, N. (2013). An Effective Application of Natural Language Processing in Second Language Instruction. Calico Journal, 13(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v13i1.47-67

Issue

Section

Articles