Stress management: Corpus-based insights into vernacular interpretations of stress
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.v10i1.81Keywords:
health literacy, polysemy, public health, stress, terminologyAbstract
Examination of the term stress in naturally occurring vernacular prose provides evidence of three separate senses being conflated. A corpus analysis of 818 instances of stress from non-academic texts in the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the Corpus of American Discourses on Health (CADOH) shows a negative prosody for stress, which is portrayed variously as a source outside the body, a physical symptom within the body and an emotional state. The data show that contemporary speakers intermingle the three senses, making more difficult a discussion between doctors and patients of ways to ‘reduce stress’, when stress might be interpreted as a stressor, a symptom, or state of anxiety. This conflation of senses reinforces the impression that stress is pervasive and increasing. In addition, a semantic shift is also refining a new sense for stress, as post-traumatic stress develops as a specific subtype of emotional stress whose use has increased in circulation in the past 20 years.Published
2014-02-16
Issue
Section
Articles
License
copyright Equinox Publishing Ltd.
How to Cite
Stvan, L. S. (2014). Stress management: Corpus-based insights into vernacular interpretations of stress. Communication and Medicine, 10(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.v10i1.81