Team talk and the evaluation of medical guidance documentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.25960Keywords:
ethnomethodology, guidance production, guidance validation, hybrid studies, team talk, thought experimentsAbstract
This article looks at team talk in a validation committee meeting assessment of a guidance document text item. The item assessment was not evidence-based in terms of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) criteria; instead, the item was assessed via the committee members present drawing on their clinical practitioner members’ knowledge and professional experience. Analysis of the meeting reveals such apparently ‘mere opinion’ to be a systematic evaluation of professional knowledge and personal experiences, in ways ‘compatible’ with thought experiments. Thought experiments are argued to be a members’ resource as well as an analyst’s one, although their detailed occasionedness is not reducible to a constructivist formalisation. The article’s approach is informed by ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, and while the use of thought experiments as a heuristic device in the analysis is controversial, a warrant for this is attempted. The research was undertaken to locate ways of understanding and supporting team members’ work of robust and useful guidance content production. ‘Validating’ guidance is shown in-and-as the emergent collaborative work of the committee members themselves.
References
Borsboom, Denny, Gideon J. Mellenbergh and Jaap van Heerden (2002) Functional thought experiments. Synthese 130 (3): 379–387. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1014840616403
Button, Graham, Michael Lynch and Wes Sharrock (2022) Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Constructive Analysis: On Formal Structure of Practical Action. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003220794
Cicourel, Aaron V. (1999) Interaction of cognitive and cultural models. In Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, 181–224. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375.2.183
Cooper, Rachel (2005) Thought experiments. Metaphilosophy 36 (3): 328–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00372.x
Dennett, Daniel C. (2013) Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. London: Allen Lane.
Field, Marilyn J. and Kathleen N. Lohr (eds) (1990) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Programme. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/1626
Fitch, Kristine L. (2003) Taken-for-granteds in (an) intercultural communication. In Phillip J. Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron and Jenny Mandelbaum (eds) Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 91–102. London: Routledge.
Franco, Luis A. and Christian Greiffenhagen (2018) Making OR practice visible: Using ethnomethodology to analyse facilitated modelling workshops. European Journal of Operational Research 265 (2): 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.016
Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, Harold (1991) Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomenon of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I) – An announcement of studies. In Graham Button (ed.) Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, 10–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611827.003
Garfinkel, Harold (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Garfinkel, Harold (2022) Harold Garfinkel: Studies of Work in the Sciences. London: Routledge.
Garfinkel, Harold and D. Lawrence Wieder (1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrical alternate technologies of social analysis. In Graham Watson and Robert M. Seiler (eds) Texts in Action: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, 175–206. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hampton, John R. (2003) Guidelines – For the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men? Clinical Medicine 3 (3): 279–284. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.3-3-279
Hopper, Robert (1981a) How to do things with words: The taken-for-granted as speech action. Communication Quarterly 29 (3): 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378109369409
Hopper, Robert (1981b) The taken-for-granted as speech-action. Human Communication Research 7 (3): 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00569.x
Husserl, Edmund (1983) Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic (Martinus Nijhoff). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7445-6
Irvine, Andrew D. (1991) Thought experiments in scientific reasoning. In Tamara Horowitz and Gerry Massey (eds) Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, 149–165. Lanham, MD: Roman and Littlefield.
Jenkings, K. Neil and Nick Barber (2001) Awaiting Viagra prescribing advice: ‘Holding letters’ as an attempted substitute for firm guidance. Paper presented at IIEMCA Conference ‘Orders of Ordinary Action’, University of Manchester, UK.
Jenkings, K. Neil and Nick Barber (2004) What constitutes evidence in hospital new drug decision making? Social Science & Medicine 58 (9): 1575–1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00373-3
Jenkings, K. Neil and Nick Barber (2006) Same evidence, different meanings: The locally mediated transformation of textual evidence in hospital new drugs Committees. Text and Talk 26 (2): 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.008
Linell, Per (1998) Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text 18 (2): 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143
Lynch, Michael (1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625473
Luff, Paul, Jon Hindmarsh and Christian Heath (2000) Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628122
Moreira, Tiago (2005) Diversity in clinical guidelines: The role of repertoires of evaluation. Social Science and Medicine 60 (9): 1975–1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.062
NICE [National Institute for Clinical Excellence] (2004) The Guideline Development Process: An Overview for Stakeholders, the Public and the NHS (February 2004). London: National Institute for Clinical Evidence.
Randall, David, Mark Rouncefield and Peter Tolmie (2021) Ethnography, CSCW and ethnomethodology. Computer Supported Collaborative Work 30: 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-020-09388-8
Ravotas, Doris and Carol Berkenkotter (1998) Voices in the text: The use of reported speech in a psychotherapist’s notes and initial assessment. Text 18 (2): 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.211
Reiner, Miriam (1998) Thought experiments and collaborative learning in physics. International Journal of Science Education 20 (9): 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200903
Rouncefield, Mark (2011) Fieldwork, ethnography and ethnomethodology. In LSCITS (ed.) Socio-Technical Systems Engineering Handbook, 44–48. St Andrews, UK: University of St Andrews.
Sarangi, Srikant (1998) Interprofessional case construction in social work: The evidential status of information and its reportability. Text 18 (2): 241–270. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.241
Sarangi, Srikant (2000) Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: The case of genetic counselling. In Srikant Sarangi and Malcolm Coulthard (eds) Discourse and Social Life, 1–27. London: Pearson. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838502-1
Sarangi, Srikant and Celia Roberts (1999) The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work-related settings. In Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, 1–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375.1.1
Sorenson, Roy A. (1992) Thought Experiments. New York. Oxford University Press.
Suchman, Lucy A. and Randall H. Trigg (1993) Artificial Intelligence as craftwork. In Seth Chaiklin and Jean Lave (eds) Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, 144–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625510.007
Trace, Ciaran B. (2016) Ethnomethodology: Foundational insights on the nature and meaning of documents in everyday life. Journal of Documentation 72 (1): 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2015-0014
vom Lehn, Dirk (2019) From Garfinkel’s ‘Experiments in Miniature’ to the ethnomethodological analysis of interaction. Human Studies 42: 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09496-5
Woolf, Steven H., Richard Grol, Allen Hutchinson, Martin Eccles and Jeremy Grimshaw (1999) Potential benefits, limitations, and harm of clinical guidelines. British Medical Journal 318 (7182): 527–530. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527
Zagorianakos, Andonis and Anna Shvarts (2015) The role of intuition in the process of objectification of mathematical phenomena from a Husserlian perspective: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics 88 (1): 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9576-9
Published
Issue
Section
License
copyright Equinox Publishing Ltd.
