Argumentative pro-vaccination and anti-vaccination narratives in the MMR vaccine-autism controversy
A discourse analysis of readers’ letters to the editor and Facebook comments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.21505Keywords:
autism, discourse analysis, Facebook comments, MMR vaccine, readers' letters, storytellingAbstract
COMET 2021 Researcher Award
This paper presents a discourse analysis of the public’s response to UK press coverage of the debate surrounding the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and its alleged link to autism from 1998 to 2019. The analysis focuses on published readers’ letters to the editor in a newspaper corpus comprising 12 national British newspapers, and on comments posted by users on the Guardian’s and the Daily Mail’s Facebook pages. These social media pages are dialogic sites of individual participation that allow users to discuss how the latest events and debates affect their daily lives, as well as how they interpret them through their own ideological, cultural, social and personal lenses. The findings show that medico-scientific issues such as vaccination are often personalised by the parents and legal guardians of young children, and that they regard individual experiences with vaccination or with vaccine-preventable diseases as valid evidence on which to base their argumentation. The findings thus highlight the need to devise effective communication to foster the science of vaccines and to counter vaccine hesitancy without belittling a person’s genuine experiences and sincere beliefs.
References
Atkin, Albert and John E. Richardson (2007) Arguing about Muslims: (Un)Reasonable argumentation in letters to the editor. Text & Talk 1 (27): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.001
Boyce, Tammy (2006) Health, Risk and News: The MMR Vaccine and the Media. New York: Peter Lang.
Carranza, Isolda E. (2015) Narrating and arguing: From plausibility to local moves. In Anna De Fina and Alexandra Georgakopoulou (eds) The Handbook of Narrative Analysis, 57–75. Oxford: Wiley.
Clarke, Christopher E. (2008) A Question of Balance. Science Communication 1 (30): 77–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008320262
De Fina, Anna and Alexandra Georgakopoulou (2015) The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Oxford: Wiley.
Deer, Brian (2020) The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Andrew Wakefield’s War on Vaccines. Brunswick, Victoria: Scribe Publications.
Downes, Edward J. and Sally J. McMillan (2000) Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media & Society 2 (2): 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440022225751
Fiammenghi, Carlotta (2022) The MMR Vaccine-Autism Controversy in the Post-Truth Era: A Discourse Analysis of a Newspaper and Facebook Corpus. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Milan, Italy.
Fløttum, Kjersti and Øyvind Gjerstad (2013) Arguing for climate policy through the linguistic construction of narratives and voices: the case of the South-African green paper ‘National Climate Change Response’. Climatic Change 118: 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0654-7
Franzke, Aline, Shakti, Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, Charles Ess and the Association of Internet Researchers (2020) Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Online: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf.
Goodwin, Charles (1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action, 225–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huws, Jaci C. and Robert S. P. Jones (2011) Missing voices: Representations of autism in British newspapers, 1999-2008. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 39 (2): 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2010.00624.x
Kata, Anna (2009) A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine 28 (7): 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
Kitta, Andrea (2018) Alternative health websites and fake news: Taking a stab at definition, genre, and belief. Journal of American Folklore 131 (522): 405–412.
Labov, William (1972) Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Landert, Daniela and Andreas H. Jucker (2011) Private and public in mass media communication: From letters to the editor to online commentaries. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (5): 1422–1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.016
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis (2010) Participation through letters to the editor: Circulation, considerations, and genres in the letters institution. Journalism 11 (1): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884909350641
Offit, Paul (2011) Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All. New York: Basic Books.
Pellicano, Liz (2018) Autism advocacy and research misses the mark if autistic people are left out. The Conversation, 10 April. Online: http://theconversation.com/autism-advocacy-and-research-misses-the-mark-if-autistic-people-are-left-out-94404.
Plastina, Anna Franca and Rosita Maglie (2019) Vague language in the MMR vaccine controversy: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of its functional use. Lingue & Linguaggi 29: 93–119.
Pounds, Gabrina (2006) Democratic participation and letters to the editor in Britain and Italy. Discourse & Society 17 (1): 29–63.
Richardson, John E. (2001) ‘Now is the time to put an end to all this’: Argumentative discourse theory and ‘letters to the editor’. Discourse & Society 12 (2): 143–168.
Richardson, John E. and Bob Franklin (2004) Letters of intent: Election campaigning and orchestrated public debate in local newspapers’ letters to the editor. Political Communication 4 (21): 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490518342
Richardson, John E. and James Stanyer (2011) Reader opinion in the digital age: Tabloid and broadsheet newspaper websites and the exercise of political voice. Journalism 12 (8): 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911415974
Sacks, Harvey (1974) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman and J. Sherzer (eds) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, Harvey (1992) Second stories. In Harvey Sacks, Lectures on Conversation, Volume 2, 764–772. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Stöckl, Andrea and Anna Smajdor (2017) The MMR debate in the United Kingdom: Vaccine scares, statesmanship and the media. In C. Holomberg, S. Blume and P. Greenough (eds) The Politics of Vaccination: A Global History, 239–259. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Torracinta, Louis, Rachel Tanner and Samantha Vanderslott (2021) MMR vaccine attitude and uptake research in the United Kingdom: A critical review. Vaccines 9 (4): Article 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040402
Van Eemeren, Frans H. (2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin (2001) Letters to the editor as a forum for public deliberation: Modes of publicity and democratic debate. Critical Studies in Media Communication 18 (3): 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180128085
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin (2002a) The construction of the public in letters to the editor: Deliberative democracy and the idiom of insanity. Journalism 3 (2): 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490200300203
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin (2002b) The normative-economic justification for public discourse: Letters to the editor as a ‘wide open’ forum. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 79 (1): 121–133.
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin (2002c) Understanding the conditions for public discourse: Four rules for selecting letters to the editor. Journalism Studies 3 (1): 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700120107347
WHO (2019) Ten threats to global health in 2019. Online: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019.
Zummo, Marianna L. (2018) The linguistic construction of confirmation niches in online comment sequences. Altre Modernità 10: 107–123.
Published
Issue
Section
License
copyright Equinox Publishing Ltd.
