Reconceptualising research, reconceptualising responsibility

A rejoinder to ‘Collecting qualitative data during a pandemic’ by David Silverman

Authors

  • Alison Pilnick University of Nottingham

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.19746

Keywords:

Forum Discussion

Abstract

.

Author Biography

  • Alison Pilnick, University of Nottingham

    Alison Pilnick received her PhD in sociology from the University of Nottingham, funded by a Department
    of Health studentship. She is currently Professor of Language, Medicine and Society at the University of Nottingham, UK. Her research interests include professional–client interaction in health and social care settings, and the way in which interactional norms and practices impact upon policy (non)enactment in healthcare. Her monograph, Between Autonomy and Abandonment: Reconsidering Patient-Centred Care, is due to be published by Emerald in Autumn 2021.

References

Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol (2020) One in a Million: Primary care consultations archive. Online: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/primaryhealthcare/researchthemes/one-in-a-million/

Fine, Gary and Corey Abramson (2020) Ethnography in the time of COVID-19: Vectors and the vulnerable. Online manuscript [extended version to appear in Etnografia e Ricerca Quvalitative]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340680966_Ethnography_in_theTime_of_COVID-19_Vectors_and_the_Vulnerable

Hammersley, M. (2010) Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues. Sociological Research Online 15 (1): Article 5. https://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/1/5.html

Keleman Saxena, Alder and Jennifer Johnson (2020) Cues for ethnography in pandamning times: Thinking with digital sociality in the Covid-19 pandemic. Somatosphere, 31 May. Online: http://somatosphere.net/2020/ethnography-inpandamning-times.html/

Murphy, Mairead, Lauren Scott, Chris Salisbury, Andrew Turner, Anne Scott, Rachel Denholm, Rhys Lewis et al. (2021) Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods longitudinal study. British Journal of General Practice 71 (704): e166–e177. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0948

Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (2020) Remote hearings in the family justice system: Reflections and experiences. Online: https://www.nuffieldfjo.org.uk/app/nuffield/files-module/local/documents/remote_hearings_sept_2020.pdf

Publons (2018) Global State of Peer Review. Online: https://publons.com/community/gspr

Publons (2019) Grant Review in Focus. Online: https://publons.com/static/Grant-Review-in-Focus-web.pdf

Seuren, Lucas, Joseph Wherton, Trisha Greenhalgh and S. Shaw (2020) Whose turn is it anyway? Latency and the organization of turn-taking in video-mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 172: 63–78.

Tancock, Christopher (2018) When reviewing goes wrong: The ugly side of peer review. Elsevier Connect. Online: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/editors-update/when-reviewinggoes-wrong-the-ugly-side-of-peer-review

Van den Eynden, Veerle, Louise Corti, Matthew Woolard, Libby Bishop and Laurence Horton (2011) Managing and Sharing Data: Best Practice for Researchers (third edition). Colchester: UK Data Archive, University of Essex. Online: https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/622417/managingsharing.pdf

Viglione, Giuliana (2020) Are women publishing less during the pandemic? Nature 581 (7809): 365–366. Online: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01294-9

Downloads

Published

2021-09-01

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Forum Discussion

License

copyright Equinox Publishing Ltd.

How to Cite

Pilnick, A. . (2021). Reconceptualising research, reconceptualising responsibility: A rejoinder to ‘Collecting qualitative data during a pandemic’ by David Silverman. Communication and Medicine, 17(1), 92-95. https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.19746