Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Primary School English Teaching Reform in Japan
Implications for Second Language Teacher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/slte.24476Keywords:
curriculum reform, Japan, primary school English (PSE), language education policy (LEP), teacher agency, teacher educationAbstract
In Japan, following several other English language education policy reforms, English language instruction was formally introduced to the elementary school curriculum as a subject in 2020. This change affects not only elementary school pupils but, perhaps more drastically, elementary school teachers, who are now required to teach English as a subject in their role as homeroom teachers. This paper reports on a study of Japanese teachers of English enrolled in in-service training workshops, and examines the degree to which the teachers feel prepared to implement the new curriculum, the challenges they may face in their classrooms, and the degree to which they feel these workshops help prepare them to implement the curriculum changes. The findings suggest that while many of the participants perceived that there was a necessity for the policy changes, they recognized how their agency may be constrained due to a variety of factors at the micro- and macro-level. A concerted effort at the level of policy planning, teacher training, and curriculum design is needed to help teachers develop their professional identities to enable the necessary changes.
References
Bett, H. K. (2016). The cascade model of teachers’ continuing professional development in Kenya: A time for change? Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1139439
Butler, Y. G. (2004). Foreign language education at elementary schools in Japan: Searching for solutions amidst growing diversification. Current Issues in Language Planning, 8(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp115.0
Butler, Y. G. (2007). What level of English proficiency do elementary school teachers need to attain to teach EFL? Case studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 245–278. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588380
Butler, Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000122
Chimbutane, F. (2019). Micro language planning and agency in the context of bilingual education provision in Mozambique. In J. Bouchard & G. P. Glasgow (Eds.), Agency in language policy and planning: Critical inquiries (pp. 77–99). Routledge.
Choi, T. (2019). Structure, agency, and the “teaching English only in English” policy: The case of South Korea. In J. Bouchard & G. P. Glasgow (Eds.), Agency in language policy and planning: Critical inquiries (pp. 214–237). Routledge.
Chua, C. S. K., & Baldauf, R. B. Jr. (2011). Microlanguage planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 936–951). Routledge.
Chung, J., & Choi, T. (2016). English education policies in South Korea: Planned and enacted. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp. 281–300). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_13
Diallo I., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2014). Planning language teaching: An argument for the place of pedagogy in language policy and planning. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/18334105.2014.11082024
Glasgow, G. P., & Paller, D. L. (2016). English language education policy in Japan: At a crossroads. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp.1–23). Springer.
Gorsuch, G. (2000). EFL educational policies and educational differences: Influences on teachers’ approval of communicative activities. TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 675–710. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587781
Hamid, M. O., & Erling, E. J. (2016). English-in-education policy and planning in Bangladesh: A critical examination. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp. 25–48). Springer.
Hashimoto, K. (2011). Compulsory ‘foreign language activities’ in Japanese primary schools. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.585958
Hashimoto, K. (2018). The professional development of English language teachers in Asia: Lessons from Japan and Vietnam. In K. Hashimoto & V. T. Nguyen (Eds.), Professional development of English language teachers in Asia: Lessons from Japan and Vietnam (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher positionality: A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research: A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
Hoo, D. K. (2012). Primary school education in Korea: From policy to practice. In B. Spolsky & Y. Moon (Eds.), Primary school English language education in Asia (pp. 59–82). Routledge.
Johnson, D. C. (2009). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050902780706
Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kaplan, R. B., Baldauf, R. B. Jr., & Kamwangamalu, N. (2011). Why educational language plans sometimes fail. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.591716
Kirkpatrick, R. (Ed.). (2017). English language education policy in the Middle East and North Africa. Springer.
Kirkpatrick, R., & Bui, T. T. N. (2016). Introduction: The challenges for English education policies in Asia. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp.1–23). Springer.
Lamie, J. (2005). Evaluating change in English language teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.
Layder, D. (1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and research. Sage.
Liddicoat, A. (2019). Constraints on agency in micro-language policy and planning in schools: A case study of curriculum change. In J. Bouchard & G. P. Glasgow (Eds.), Agency in language policy and planning: Critical inquiries (pp. 149–170). Routledge.
Machida, T. (2016). Foreign language anxiety and Japanese elementary-school teachers’ characteristics. In J. Crandall & M. Christison (Eds.), Teacher education and professional development in TESOL: Global perspectives (pp. 176–190). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641263
Machida, T., & Uchida, H. (2015). Kyoshi no gaikokugofuan no keigen wo mezashita kyoinkenshu no kaihatsu [Development of an in-service training course focusing on alleviating teachers’ foreign language anxiety]. JES Journal, 15(1), 34–49.
Machida, T., & Walsh, D. J. (2015). Implementing EFL policy reform in elementary schools in Japan: A case study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2015.970728
Manh, D. L, Hoa, T. M. N., & Burns, A. (2020). English primary teacher agency in implementing teaching methods in response to language policy reform: A Vietnamese case study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(5), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741209
Menken, K., & Garcia, O. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language policies: Teachers as policymakers. Routledge.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT). (2014). English education reform plan corresponding to globalization. https://www.mext.go.jp/en/news/topics/detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2014/01/23/1343591_1.pdf
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2017). About the revision of the course of study. https://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/elsec/title02/detail02/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/03/28/1303755_001.pdf
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT). (2019). Gaikokugo koa karikyuramu ni tsuite [Core curriculum about English education]. https://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2019/04/04/1415122_3.pdf
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT). (2020). Reiwa 1 eigokyouiku jisshi jokyou chousa gaiyou [2019AY Survey of English implementation]. https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20220516-mxt_kyoiku01-000022559_2.pdf
Molina, S. C. (2017). English language teaching in China: Teacher agency in response to curricular innovations. In C. L. P. Ng & E. F. Boucher-Yip (Eds.), English language teaching: Teacher agency and policy response (pp. 7–25). Routledge.
Nemoto, A. K. (2018). Getting ready for 2020: Changes and challenges for English education in public primary schools in Japan. The Language Teacher, 42(4), 33–36.
Ng, C. L. P. (2016). Primary school English reform in Japan: Policies, progress and challenges. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1147118
Ng, C. L. P. (2017). Sociocultural factors affecting teacher agency in English medium instruction in Japan. In C. L. P. Ng & E. F. Boucher-Yip (Eds.), Teacher agency and policy response in English language teaching (pp. 160–173). Routledge.
Ng, C. L. P., & Boucher-Yip, E. F. (Eds.). (2017). Teacher agency and policy response in English language teaching. Routledge.
Ng, C. L. P., Matikainen, T., & Glasgow, G. P. (2023). Multilingualism in global Englishes language teaching: Narrative insights from three TESOL practitioners in Japan. In K. Raza, D. Reynolds & C. Coombe (Eds.), Handbook of multilingual TESOL in practice. Springer.
Osman, S., & Ahn, E. (2017). Navigating change: Kazakhstani English language teachers’ response to multi-scalar education reforms. In C. L. P. Ng & E. F. Boucher-Yip (Eds.), Teacher agency and policy response in English language teaching (pp.133–147). Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0718.pub2
Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT profession. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587691
Roux, P. (2016). Reforming English education in Japan: A survey with elementary school teachers. Saga University General Education Bulletin, 4, 123–136.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Shiobara, F. J., & Sakui, K. (2019). Teachers’ attitudes to team-teaching in Japanese elementary schools. In P. Clements, A. Krause, & P. Bennett (Eds.), Diversity and inclusion (pp. 109–114). JALT.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
Stritikus, T. T. (2003). The interrelationship of beliefs, context and learning: The case of a teacher reacting to language policy. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 2(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0201_2
Tsui, A. B. M. (Ed.). (2020). English language teaching and teacher education in East Asia: Global challenges and local responses. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108856218
van Lier, L. (2010). Foreword: Agency, self and identity in language learning. In B. O’Rourke & L. Carson (Eds.), Language learner autonomy: Policy, curriculum, classroom (pp. ix–xviii). Peter Lang.
Weston, C., Gandell, T., Beauchamp, J., McAlpine, L., Wiseman, C., & Beauchamp, C. (2001). Analyzing interview data: The development and evolution of a coding system. Qualitative Sociology, 24(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010690908200
Yamamori, N. (2013). Gaikokugo katsudo ni motome rareru kyoushi no kyoushitsu eigo ryoku no wakugumi to kyouin kenshu puroguramu no kaihatsu: Riron to genjyou wo fumaete [Teachers’ classroom English ability for foreign language activities and teacher training: Integrating theory and reality]. JES Journal, 13, 195–210.
Yoshida, T. (2020). English education reform, teacher education, and the Tokyo Olympics: Perfect timing? In A. B. M. Tsui (Ed.), English language teaching and teacher education in East Asia: Global challenges and local responses (pp. 135–158). Cambridge University Press.
