Exploring language examiner training as professional learning in a Canadian teacher education program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/slte.22643Keywords:
Preservice teacher education, Language teachers, Second language programs, French as a Second Language, Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR), Diplôme d’Études de Langue Française (DELF)Abstract
This study examines the potential impact of training informed by the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) on future French as a second language (FSL) teachers’ language proficiency and developing pedagogical practice. Specifically, it examines the implementation of the Diplôme d’Études de Langue Française [DELF] Correcteur training in a Canadian preservice FSL teacher education program from 2018 to 2021. Findings from surveys (N = 42) and semi-structured interviews (n = 3) reveal key possibilities and limitations for this training to optimize language teacher preparation, eventual transition to the field, and overall retention in the Canadian FSL teaching context.
References
AmbaFrance. (2021). Becoming examiner, scorer or trainer. https://delf-dalf.ambafrance-ca.org/becoming-examiner-scorer-or-trainer
Argudo, J., Abad, M., Fajardo-Dack, T., & Cabrera, P. (2018). Analyzing a preservice EFL program through the lenses of the CLIL approach at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.4
Arnott, S., Piccardo, E., Brogden, L. M., Rehner, K., Faez, F., Taylor, S. K., Péguret, M., & Wernicke, M. (2017). The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in Canada: A research agenda. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 31–54. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/24472/29667
Arnott, S., Smith, C. W., Battistuzzi, A., & Adatia, S. (forthcoming). Supporting FSL teacher candidates’ planning, teaching, and assessment through DELF Correcteur training. Manuscript in progress.
Arnott, S. & Vignola, M.-J. (2018). The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in French immersion teacher education: A focus on the language portfolio. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.17008.arn
Arnott, S., & Vignola, M.-J. (2020). The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in French immersion teacher education: A focus on the language portfolio. In L. Cammarata & T. J. Ó Ceallaigh, Teacher development for immersion and content-based instruction (pp. 171–195). John Benjamins.
Association Canadienne des Professionnels de l’Immersion. (2018). Final report: Canada-wide consultation. Immersion Journal, 40(2), 1–32. Ottawa, ON: Association Canadienne des Professionnels de l’Immersion.
Battistuzzi, A., & Smith, C. W. (submitted). Examining CEFR-related professional learning for language teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Manuscript submitted.
Boucher, M. (2020). Le degré d’intégration du Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues dans les curriculums de français langue seconde du palier secondaire des provinces et des territoires au Canada. Thèse de maîtrise, Université d’Ottawa. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/40881
Boucher, M., & Vignola, M.-J. (2022). La présence conceptuelle du CECR dans les curriculums de français de base du palier secondaire au Canada. [The conceptual presence of the CEFR in core French secondary school curricula in Canada] The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 152–183.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Broad, K., & Tessaro, M. L. (2010). Voices from the field: Associate teachers and teacher candidates in learning conversations. In T. Falkenberg & H. Smits (Eds.), Field experiences in the context of reform of Canadian teacher education programs (pp. 79–90). University of Manitoba Press.
Cakir, A., & Balcikanli, C. (2012). The use of the European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL) to foster teacher autonomy: English language teaching (ELT) student teachers’ and teacher trainers’ views. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n3.7
Canadian Parents for French (CPF). (2018). The state of French second language education in Canada 2018: Focus on French second language teachers. https://cpf.ca/wp-content/uploads/State-of-FSL-Education-Report-2018-WITH-Bibliography.pdf
Celce-Murcia, M. (2014). An overview of language teaching methods and approaches. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. Brinton, & A. Snow (Eds.). Teaching English as a second foreign language, 4th ed. (pp. 2–14). Heinle Cengage Learning.
Cimermanová, I. (2018). Teaching portfolio as a source of preservice teacher training programme needs analysis. Pedagogika, 131(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2018.42
Cindric, I., Andraka, M., & Bilic-Štefan, M. (2015). Raising students’ awareness of teaching competences by means of the European portfolio for student teachers of languages. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v17i0.1523
Council of Europe (COE). (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Council of Europe Publishing. https://rm.coe.int/1680459f97
Council of Europe (COE). (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. www.coe.int/lang-cefr
Council of Europe (COE). (2021). Resources for implementation. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/practical-resources
Cowie, B., & Harrison, C. (2016). Classroom processes that support effective assessment. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 335–350). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749136
Crossouard, B. (2011). Using formative assessment to support complex learning in conditions of social adversity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.536034
Cuadrado-Moreno, J., & Reyes Fernández, M. (2012). A model for training teachers to identify common reference levels in written production activities. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(2), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.2.295-305
Cummins, J. (2014). To what extent are Canadian second language policies evidence-based? Reflections on the intersections of research and policy. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00358
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world. Jossey-Bass.
Díez-Bedmar, M. B., & Byram, M. (2019). The current influence of the CEFR in secondary education: Teachers’ perceptions. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1493492
Faez, F., Majhanovich, S., Taylor, S., Smith, M., & Crowley, K. (2011). The power of “can do” statements: Teachers’ perceptions of DEFR-informed instruction in French as a second language classrooms in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 1–19.
Faez, F., Taylor, S., Majhanovich, S., Brown, P., & Smith, M. (2011). Teacher reactions to CEFR’s task-based approach for FSL classrooms. Synergies Europe, 6, 109–120.
Figueras, N. (2012). The impact of the CEFR. ELT journal, 66(4), 477–485.
Fives, H., & Barnes, N. (2020). Navigating the complex cognitive task of classroom assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103063
Freynet, A., Honorat, H., & Maiffredy, J. (1991). DELF/DALF: L’évaluation au service de la formation. Le Français Dans Le Monde, 238, 70–72.
Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge handbook of language testing. Routledge.
Jack, D., & Nyman, J. (2019). Meeting labour market needs for French as a second language instruction in Ontario. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(7), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-7-1
Johnson, K. E. (2015). Reclaiming the relevance of L2 teacher education. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12242
Kir, E. (2011). Teacher trainers’ views on foreign language teacher training. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 806–830.
Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2009). Priorities in teacher education: The 7 key elements of preservice preparation. Routledge.
Lapkin, S., Mady, C., & Arnott, S. (2009). Research perspectives on core French: A literature review. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 6–30.
Martyniuk, W. (2010). Aligning tests with the CEFR: Reflections on using the Council of Europe’s draft manual. Cambridge University Press.
Mason, K. O. (2013). Teacher involvement in preservice teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(5), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.827366
Masson, M. & Azan, A. (2021). Second language teacher attrition, retention and recruitment: A literature review on issues, challenges and strategies for French as a second language teachers. Canadian Association of Second Language Teachers. https://www.caslt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/sample-teacher-attrition-lit-en.pdf
Masson, M., Battistuzzi, A., & Bastien, M.-P. (2021). Essential components of effective teacher education for language teachers. Canadian Association for Second Language Teachers.
Mehlmauer-Larcher, B. (2012). The EPOSTL (European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages): A tool to promote reflection and learning in preservice teacher education. In J. Hüttner, B. Mehlmauer-larcher, S. Reichl, & B. Schiftner (Eds.), Theory and practice in EFL teacher education: Bridging the gap (pp. 186–203). Multilingual Matters.
Mirici, I. H., & Hergüner, S. (2015). A digital european self-assessment tool for student teachers of foreign languages: The EPOSTL. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 1–10. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1057332.pdf
Moonen, M., Stoutjesdijk, E., De Graaff, R., & Corda, A. (2013). Implementing CEFR in secondary education: Impact on FL teachers’ educational and assessment practice. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12000
Neimeyer, R. A., & Torres, C. (2015). Constructivism and constructionism: Methodology. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 724–728). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44009-2
Newby, D. (2012). Supporting good practice in teacher education through the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2012.725250
Ní Dhiorbháin, A. (2019). Exploring the potential of the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages (EPOSTL) as a reflective tool in initial primary teacher education. Irish Educational Studies, 38(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2019.1611466
North, B. (2007). The CEFR illustrative descriptor scales. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 656–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_3.x
Pegelescu, A. M. (2020). From “profile” to “portfolio” and beyond: The image of linguistic policies and sustainable development in language teachers’ education. Philologica Jassyensia, 16(2), 373–378.
Phaisannan, T., Charttrakul, K., & Damnet, A. (2019). The CEFR-TBL in Fostering Thai preservice Teachers’ English speaking ability using the peer interview task. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(5), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.5p.10
Piccardo, E. (2010). From communicative to action-orientated: New perspectives for a new millennium. Contact, 36(2), 20–33.
Piccardo, E. (2011). Du CECR au développement professionnel: pour une démarche stratégique. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 20–52. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19856
Piccardo, E. (2013). (Re)conceptualiser l’enseignement d’une langue seconde à l’aide d’outils d’évaluations: Comment les enseignants canadiens perçoivent le CECR. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 386–414. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1737.386
Piccardo, E., & North, B. (2019). The action-oriented approach: A dynamic vision of language education. Multilingual Matters.
Rehner, K. (2017). The CEFR in Ontario: Transforming classroom practice. https://transformingfsl.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/LGY769-DELF-1.pdf
Rehner, K. (2018). The classroom practices of DELF teacher-correcteurs: A pan-Canadian perspective. https://www.acpi.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Rehner_Report_2018_final_mars_2018_EN_final.pdf
Rehner, K., Lasan, I., Popovich, A., & Palta, Z. (2021). The impact of CEFR-related professional learning on second-language teachers’ classroom practice: The case of French in Canada. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2021.28992
Rehner, K., Popovich, A., & Lasan, I. (2021). How the CEFR is impacting French-as-a-Second-Language in Ontario, Canada: Teachers’ self-reported instructional practices and students’ proficiency exam results. Languages, 6(15), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6010015
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
Schauber, H. (2015). Using the EPOSTL for dialogic reflection in EFL teacher education. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 11, 118–137. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.290
Seitova, M., Mirici, I. H., & Öz, H. (2019). The effect of the EPOSTL on the self-evaluation of student teachers of English. Elementary Education Online, 18(3), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.612580
Sešek, U. (2007). English for teachers of EFL – Toward a holistic description. English for Specific Purposes, 26(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.11.001
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Straková, Z. (2016). A critical look at the portfolio as a tool for teacher cognition at pre-gradual level: Perceptions of students. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4(3), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/jolace-2016-0026
Timperley, H. (2015). Continuing professional development. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 796–802). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92134-2
Vandergrift, L. (2015). The DELF in Canada: Perceptions of students, teachers, and parents. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1752
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010