Aquariums and Human–Animal Relations at the Great Barrier Reef

Authors

  • Ann Elias University of Sydney

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/qre.2022.6

Keywords:

The Great Barrier Reef, commercial development, modern tourist advertising images, coloured advertising lithographs, split-level visualisations

Abstract

In the early twentieth century, great delight in the unique tropical beauty of the Great Barrier Reef, coupled with an opportunistic spirit for commercial development, inspired the commission of eye-catching posters and advertisements by Australian tourist organisations. The aim of this article is to discuss a pictorial device that developed alongside the rise of modern tourist advertising images of Great Barrier Reef – a split-level viewpoint that approximates the effect of looking at the Reef through the glass sides of an aquarium. Building on my earlier research published in 2019 on wildlife photography and the construction of the Great Barrier Reef as a modern visual spectacle, and combining art history with environmental history, this article also turns to coloured advertising lithographs. It argues that split-level visualisations separate human from non-human and elevate the idea of human superiority. With the Great Barrier Reef facing unprecedented ecological pressures, the historical images at the centre of this article are instructive for understanding the deleterious effects of anthropogenic impact, as well as early twentieth-century attitudes towards human–non-human relations.

Author Biography

Ann Elias, University of Sydney

Ann Elias is Professor of Art History and Visual Culture at the University of Sydney. Research interests include camouflage as a military, social and aesthetic phenomenon; flowers and their cultural history; and coral reef imagery of the underwater realm. Books include Camouflage Australia: Art, Nature, Science and War (2011), Useless Beauty: Flowers and Australian Art (2015) and Coral Empire (2019). She is a Research Affiliate with the Sydney Environment Institute. Research in progress asks how the underwater of Sydney Harbour relates to Australian, Pacific and world social histories.

References

See Ann Elias, Coral empire: Underwater oceans, colonial tropics, visual modernity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2019).

Frank Hurley, ‘The wondrous sea floor’, The Richmond River Herald and Northern Districts Advertiser, 11 February 1921, 3.

Celmara Pocock, ‘Romancing the Reef: History, heritage and the hyper-real’, unpublished PhD thesis, James Cook University (2003), p. 240.

See Michelle Hetherington, James Northfield and the art of selling Australia (Canberra: National Library of Australia, 2006).

Jane Bennett, Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010), p. 116.

W. J. T. Mitchell, ‘Showing seeing: A critique of visual culture’, Journal of Visual Culture 1(2) (2002), 170–1.

Randy Malamud, An introduction to animals and visual culture (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), p. 3.

Judith Hamera, Parlor ponds: The cultural work of the American home aquarium, 1850–1970 (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2012), p. 9.

Aquariums were nineteenth-century optical technologies that innovated ways of seeing and conceptualising the undersea and its animals. See Palle B. Petterson, Cameras into the wild: A history of early wildlife and expedition filmmaking 1895–1928 (Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co., 2011), p. 55.

Anon, ‘Great Barrier Reef’, Sydney Morning Herald, 20 June 1929, 15.

Anon, ‘Wonders of Great Barrier Reef. Tourist asset to Queensland. Potentialities not yet exploited’, Nambour Chronicle and North Coast Advertiser, 26 January 1934, 4.

Deirdre Gilfedder, ‘The visual rhetoric of Australian travel posters between the wars: Branding a new nation’, Cultures of the Commonwealth 15–16 (2010), 99.

John Urry, Consuming places (London: Routledge, 1995), p. 1.

Gilfedder, ‘The visual rhetoric of Australian travel posters’, 97.

For a discussion of De la Beche see Renee M. Clary and James J. Wandersee, ‘Through the looking glass: The history of aquarium views and their potential to improve learning in science classrooms’, Science & Education 14 (2005), 583. For an illustration, see Tom Sharpe, ‘The De la Beche archive at Amgueddfa Cymru’, National Museum Wales, https://museum.wales/articles/2009-04-20/The-De-la-Beche-archive-at-Amgueddfa-Cymru.

Charles C Eldredge, ‘Wet paint: Herman Melville, Elihu Vedder, and artists undersea’, American Art 11(2) (1997), 113.

Kari Weil, Thinking animals: Why animal studies now? (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), p. 35.

National identity informed by narratives of early explorers is discussed in Gordon Waitt, ‘Selling paradise and adventure: Representations of landscape in the tourist advertising of Australia’, Australian Geographical Studies 35(1) (1997), 47–60.

Shin Yamashiro, American sea literature: Seascapes, beach narratives, and underwater explorations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), p. 95.

Morton, ‘X-ray’, in Jeffrey Cohen (ed.), Prismatic ecology: Ecotheory beyond green (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2013), p. 311.

The Great Barrier Coral Reef, published by the Queensland Government Tourist Bureau, quoted in E. W. G. Bogner, ‘The Great Barrier Coral Reef’, Horsham Times (Vic), 14 July 1933, 10.

Bogner, ‘The Great Barrier Coral Reef’, 10.

Gísli Pálsson, ‘Human–environmental relations: Orientalism, paternalism and communalism, in Philippe Descola and Gísli Pálsson (eds), Nature and society: Anthropological perspectives (London: Routledge, 1996), p. 67.

Ben Daley and Peter Griggs, ‘“Loved to death”: Coral collecting in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, 1770–1970’, Environment and History 14(1) (2008), 97.

Anon, ‘Wonders of Great Barrier Reef’, 4.

Alexsandra Ilicheva, ‘Plenty of fish in the sea: Geography of abundance, sustainability and ethics of non-mammalian marine animals’, unpublished MA thesis, California State University (2011), p. 45.

Donna Haraway, ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies 14(3) (1988), 581.

Judith Wright, The coral battleground (Melbourne: Spinifex Press, 2014), p. 2.

Frank Hurley, ‘Beneath the waves: strange grotesque life; forests of amazing foliage’, Sun, 11 November 1921, 9.

Norman Caldwell, ‘The fangs of the Australian sea’, Voice (Hobart), 5 October 1935, 2.

Gaston Bachelard, Water and dreams (Dallas, TX: Pegasus Foundation, 1983), p. 179.

N.Q. Naturalists’ Club, ‘Green Island Aquarium’, Cairns Post, 4 September 1936, 3.

Bernd Brunner, The ocean at home: An illustrated history of the aquarium (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2005), p. 126.

Anon, ‘Thrills and joys of the Barrier Reef: Teeming with game fish’, Proserpine Guardian, 24 August 1935, 3.

Bogner, ‘The Great Barrier Coral Reef’, 10.

T. C. Roughley, Big game angling Australia (Sydney: National Travel Association, 1937), unpaginated.

Anon, ‘Wonders of Great Barrier Reef’, 4.

Anon, ‘Thrills and Joys of the Barrier Reef’, 3.

H. G. McKay, ‘Undeveloped resources of the Barrier Reef’, Smith’s Weekly, 1 September 1923, 4.

William D. Robbins, Mizue Hisano, Sean R. Connolly and J. J. Howard Choat, ‘Ongoing collapse of coral-reef shark populations’, Current Biology 16 (2006), 2314.

J. E. N. Veron, A reef in time: The state of the Great Barrier Reef (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008), p. 49.

Earle cited in Will Abberley, ‘Introduction’ in Underwater worlds: Submerged visions in science and culture (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018), p. 10.

William Cronon, ‘The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature’, Environmental History 1(1) (1996), 15.

Anon, ‘The Great Barrier Reef: Nature’s bounty’, Port Macquarie News and Hastings River Advocate, 10 December 1927, 4.

For a discussion of colonial impacts and dispossession at the Great Barrier Reef see I. Lyons, R. Hill, S. Deshong et al. ‘Putting uncertainty under the cultural lens of Traditional Owners from the Great Barrier Reef catchments’, Regional Environmental Change 19 (2019), 1597–1610. For information about Indigenous ownership and historical displacement, see Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, ‘Traditional Owners of the Great Barrier Reef’, https://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/our-partners/traditional-owners/traditional-owners-of-the-great-barrier-reef.

Bernard Klein, ‘The ocean at home: An illustrated history of the aquarium’ review in Victorian Studies 48(4) (2006), 710.

J. Malcolm Shick, ‘Towards an aesthetic marine biology’, Art Journal 67(4) (2008), 78.

Ralph R. Acampora, Corporal compassion: Animal ethics and philosophy of body (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2006), p. 5.

Astrida Neimanis, Bodies of water: Posthuman feminist phenomenology (London: Bloomsbury, 2017), pp. 137–8.

Alphonso Lingis, ‘The rapture of the deep’, in Alphonso Lingis, Excesses: Eros and culture (New York: State University of New York Press, 1983), p. 13.

Published

2021-12-01

How to Cite

Elias, A. (2021). Aquariums and Human–Animal Relations at the Great Barrier Reef. Queensland Review, 28(2), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/qre.2022.6

Issue

Section

Articles