Smart State is also Creative State

Opportunities for Queensland in the Creative Industries

Authors

  • Stuart Cunningham Queensland University of Technology
  • Greg Hearn Queensland University of Technology
  • Jeff Jones Queensland University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1321816600002506

Keywords:

Queensland Research and Development (R&D) strategy, Smart State policy, social and creative disciplines, commercial potential

Abstract

This paper analyses and critiques the Queensland Government's Research and Development (R&D) strategy that undergirds the smart state policy agenda. We argue that this strategy poorly addresses: R&D opportunities deriving from the applied social and creative disciplines; and the role of the social and creative disciplines in the development and commercialisation process for all research. Furthermore, we suggest this derives from a view of ‘smart’ which is biased towards science and technology.

Queensland can no longer afford to understand the social and creative disciplines as commercially irrelevant, ‘civilising’ disciplines. Instead they must be recognised as the vanguard of economic growth. In particular, the proposed R&D strategy does nothing to position Queensland for the emerging wave of innovation needed to meet demand for content creation in entertainment, education, government, and health information, in order to exploit universal networked broadband architectures currently in development.

Not only is research in the applied social and creative disciplines required for its own commercial potential, but also because such research must be hybridised with science and technology research to realise the commercial potential of the latter. Commercialisation depends on ‘whole product value propositions’ not just basic research. We suggest that there needs to be mechanisms whereby research in the social and creative disciplines can be meaningfully hybridised with basic research in technology to create new commercial opportunities for Queensland. To this end we describe two examples of research driven commercialisation outside science/technology, namely interaction design and broadcasting.

Author Biographies

  • Stuart Cunningham, Queensland University of Technology

    Stuart Cunningham, Director of the Creative Industries Research and Applications Center (CIRAC) at QUT, is an accomplished researcher, and the author of some of Australia's most influential works in media, communication, cultural studies and policy. Alone and in collaboration, he has published twelve books and monographs, more than 40 chapters and entries, and seventy journal articles.

  • Greg Hearn, Queensland University of Technology

    Greg Hearn, Media and Communication, Creative Industries Faculty, QUT, focuses his consulting and research on the future cultural impact of global communication networks on organisations and communities. He has been a visiting fellow in both the United Kingdom (The Centre for Research in Innovation, Culture and Technology - BruneI University) and the United States (Cornel University).

  • Jeff Jones, Queensland University of Technology

    Jeff Jones, Director of Applications, CIRAC, QUT and of the Interaction Design Center has been Head of QUT Communication Design since it began in 1996. The applications area within CIRAC at QUT builds upon the practical nature of the Communication Design degrees to form innovative R&D activities. Previously Jeff worked mainly in museums and universities in New York City where he also developed one of the first industry projects to spin out of NYU's Interactive Telecommunication Program in the Tisch School of the Arts.

References

Bryant, K., and Wells, A., (eds) 1998, A New Economic Paradigm? Innovation-based Evolutionary Systems, Department of Science, Industry and Resources, Canberra.

CITF (Creative Industries Task Force) 2001, www.culture.gov.uk/creative/mapping.html.

Crossman, P., 2000, Drivers of Queensland's Economic Growth, Conference of Economists 3-6 July, Economic Society of Australia.

Department of State Development, Qld Government 2002, www.sd.qld.gov.au/dsdweb/htdocs/global,content.cfm?id=24.

DUE (Department of Information and the Information Economy) 2002, R and D Strategy Issues Paper www.iie.qld.gov.au/research/strategy.html Queensland Government.

Graham, P., and Rooney, D., 2001, ‘A Sociolinguistic Approach to Applied Epistemology: Examining Technocratic Values in Global “Knowledge” Policy’, Social Epistemology 15: 155–169.

Hearn, G., Mandeville, T., and Anthony, D., 1998, The Communication Superhighway: Social and Economic Change in the Digital age, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

Howkins, J., 2001, The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.

Leadbeater, C., and Oakley, K., 1999, The Independents: Britain's new cultural entrepreneurs, Demos, London.

Landry, C., 2000, The Creative City, Earthscan, London.

McDonald, F. and Thorpe, R. (eds) 1998, Organizational Strategy and Technological Adaptation to Global Change, Macmillan, Basingstoke Hampshire.

OECD 1998, Content as a New Growth Industry Working Party on the Information Economy, OECD, Paris.

Porter, M., 1998, ‘Clusters and the New Economics of Competition’, Harvard Business Review, 76.6: 77–91.

Potts, J., forthcoming, ‘The Use of Connections in a Knowledge Society’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics.

Rifkin, J., 2000, The Age of Access, Penguin, London.

Rooney, D., Hearn, G., Mandeville, T., and Joseph, R. (in press), Public Policy in Knowledge-Based Economies: Foundations and Frameworks, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Svensson, G., 2000, ‘A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of Vulnerability in Supply Chains’, International Journal of Physical and Logistics Management, 30.9: 731–749.

Published

2003-05-01

How to Cite

Cunningham, S., Hearn, G., & Jones, J. (2003). Smart State is also Creative State: Opportunities for Queensland in the Creative Industries. Queensland Review, 10(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1321816600002506