From paper to program

Successfully translating an idea into a reality

Authors

  • Marion Minis Criss Cross Consultancy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/qre.2017.8

Keywords:

Criss Cross Consultancy (CCC), Good Practice Framework, program management, meaningful communication

Abstract

No matter how excellent a framework for a new program is or how great it looks on paper, the challenge is how to ‘translate’ it into practice in such a way that it is an asset to the paid staff, volunteers and children involved. In this article, experiences of program development and delivery at Criss Cross Consultancy (CCC), where programs to empower vulnerable people are designed, are shared. With reference to the Good Practice Framework, the article draws on extensive program management experience to explore how good communication can support the effective design, implementation and delivery of programs. It illustrates the link between practice, meaningful communication and inclusion. Meaningful communication enables program content to be designed and adjusted to meet the needs of staff and children; shared decision-making to build co-ownership; recognition of expertise and matching people to roles; and effective top-down and bottom-up communication practices that engage with everyone. These communication outcomes are explored and examples are provided to illustrate how meaningful communication underpins the success of translating a program idea into a reality.

Author Biography

  • Marion Minis, Criss Cross Consultancy

    Marion Minis works as project manager and trainer on social (inclusion) programs at Criss Cross Consultancy in Rotterdam. These programs include arts and sports as means to reach out to, and empower, vulnerable groups: youth, adults and the elderly. As an expert on ‘social policy and inclusion’, she participated at the European Citizen Consultation (ECC) and has chaired Graduate Women International’s (GWI) ‘Status of Women Committee’ working (bottom up) on the program and content of GWI, and initiated a working group to develop an etoolkit, ‘Education & Human Rights’, to facilitate GWI’s worldwide membership.

References

Koenen H. and van der Heijden A. 2008. ‘Dream team time 2007’, programma evaluatie, Stichting Culturall and Criss Cross Consultancy, Rotterdam.

Minis M. and van Dijcke K. 2015. ‘MooiMaken! (2014–15)’, programma evaluatie. Rotterdam: Stichting Culturall and Criss Cross Consultancy.

Minis M. and Verhoeven B. 2006. Evaluatie rapportage ‘KunstScoren (2005-06)’, Stichting Culturall and Criss Cross Consultancy, Rotterdam.

Seymour K. 2012. Good practice principles for youth development organisations. 2nd ed. Brisbane: Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance, Griffith University.

van der Heijden A. 2010. ‘ASOkunst! De Dialoog (2009–2010)’, programma evaluatie. Rotterdam: Stichting Culturall and Criss Cross Consultancy.

—— 2013. Evaluatie ‘Passiekids (2011-2012)’. Rotterdam: Stichting Culturall and Criss Cross Consultancy.

Verhoeven B. and Minis M. 2003. Evaluatie ‘Offline (2002–03)’, Stichting Culturall and Criss Cross Consultancy, Rotterdam.

Verhoeven B., Minis M. (2001), ‘KidsKunst Miniatuurkunst(2000-01)’, programma evaluatie. Rotterdam: Stichting Culturall and Criss Cross Consultancy.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-01

How to Cite

Minis, M. (2017). From paper to program: Successfully translating an idea into a reality. Queensland Review, 24(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/qre.2017.8